ARTICLE REVIEW 4
New Insights
The literature identifies the problem to be lack of enough information on the topic of
CCT in the previous researches. There is a recent change made in the international market that
has primarily prompted the interest in the study of CCT. The authors suggest that various firms
in the US have not been very successful in the selection and retention of competent managers
international assignments. They also add that there is a rapid increase in the number of Asian
companies abroad and various Asian countries are emerging as economic superpowers.
Additionally, successful businesses in Asia are active internationally and send their expertise to
other countries. These rapid changes increase the need for a new CCT framework. However, the
companies are not given focus in equal measures when considering CCT research.
CCT researches include conceptual frameworks such as social learning theory, cultural
value framework, social capital theory, sequential adjustment theory, and experimental learning
theory. The Hofstede’s framework of cultural value is among the popular in the research
regarding cross cultures ((Nam, Cho, & Lee, 2014). It helps in the study of individual attitudes
and behavior. The most prominent difference between Western countries and Asia in cultural
studies is found to be individualism versus collectivism. Cultural dimensions help to understand
the national culture variances. However, it also presents the dangers of dimension dogma. It is
essential for human resource managers to understand that these cultural dimensions change in
various contexts and rates across the globe and, therefore, may only give part of the framework
(Jin, Fosh, & Chen, 2012). Kolb’s experiential learning theory is among the commonly used
theories when it comes to managers learning from experiences (Kaynes, 2011). This theory is a
process of knowledge construction in a creative way among the models of thinking, reflecting,