Surname 2
that the active learning approach tends to eliminate the effects of discrimination evident in the
improved performance of the women, first-generation students and those from low-income
families.
The article attributes the variance in performance evident in the different methods of
teaching to the fact that there is the disproportionate likelihood of the poor and minority students
to attend the seemingly low performing learning institutions thus missing out on the vibrant
extracurricular and academic provisions familiar to those that the students from the apparently
affluent families encounter. The fact that the lectures often subject the students to the same
professor, similar lecture hall while the students have different backgrounds regularly contribute
significantly to their capability to retain and absorb what they hear.
The active learning approach is more effective in delivering knowledge than
administering courses through lectures. The lectures are discriminatory with only the students
having undergone efficient learning system in their earlier stages of development performing
better. The lectures tend to benefit the most the students from affluent backgrounds and male
whites. However, the study conducted by comparing the effectiveness of active learning
approach suggests that the method plays a vital role in benefiting all the students especially the
females, minority, first-generation and low-income.
Moreover, the process of placing and individual’s thoughts into words and ensuring their
effective communication to others act as a powerful tool that facilitates learning. The active
learning courses often play a significant role in providing the opportunity for the learners to
debate and talk with each another in a somewhat low-pressure and collaborative environment.
The traditional lectures usually present a barrier to learning of the students from low-income
families and minority groups through their exposure to a high-pressure atmosphere, which