Argumentive Essay On Suicide

Surname 1

Name

Professor

Course

Date

Who's to blame for police brutality?

Introduction

Police brutality is a form of police misconduct that involves the use of excessive force

when dealing with civilians. The misconduct takes different forms; use of guns, nerve gas, false

arrests, psychological intimidation and verbal abuse to intentionally hurt individuals. In the

modern days, many countries have formulated laws to address police brutality. Unfortunately,

many complaints made are never addressed. This condition then raises the question, Is the

government liable for crimes committed by the police against its citizens.

The law protects all individuals against police brutality. However, the government grants

the police authority to use force when deemed necessary. In such cases, establishing the

responsible party for prosecution becomes difficult. The state, as the principal grantor of power

and formulator of policies, therefore should be held accountable in the event personal rights of

civilians are violated by the police. The police are merely agents to receive and execute

commands. In the event one's rights are violated through police brutality, the victim should

gather details about the witnesses, take pictures of the physical injuries caused and a medical

report to aid in seeking reimbursement and prosecution of the officers.

Surname 2

The government does the procurement of anti-demonstration gadgets. Taxpayers

resources are spent in most territories to acquire sophisticated equipment to be used in control of

crowds; this motivates the police to resort to archaic means when controlling crowds. Live

ammunition can only be used on orders, however, renegade officers taint the reputation of the

police service by using it against innocent citizens. The government can stop police brutality by

banning the importation of gadgets that easily cause harm to the public when misused by the

police officers.

Lack of free criminal justice system and accountability within law enforcement agencies

is as a result of lack of proper legal policies to protect the public. The state has a mandate in

ensuring that the laws implemented are towards safeguarding the interests all the stakeholder.

With a corrupt and inefficient system of redress, many culprits of police brutality remain

unpunished in the corridors of justice. Leaders need to take personal responsibility for

militarising the police while providing ramifications to enable them to use unregulated force in

managing the crowds. The human rights organisations should be allowed to facilitate the

prosecution of this form of misconduct. The police have to remain flexible law enforcers to

benefit all classes of people; this remains a dream unless the state prioritises amendments to

create an efficient system and laws to protect both the police and the citizens.

The state has failed to provide adequate training to the police in non-violent solutions.

Lawlessness is a result of ignorance in most cases; the government has a direct role in equipping

the police with the right skills and information on how to approach different situations. People

expect a wide range of services from the security personnel, ranging from emergency responses,

evacuation, and protection among others. Unless the state trains them to be responsive to both

the people and those in authority, they view violence as a solution to mitigating a particular

Surname 3

conflict. Investing in proper training is the only solution towards mitigating police brutality, the

country should offer trainers and training aid.

The responsibility of ending police brutality is however not limited to the government.

Individual officers have to act in utmost good faith when handling members of the public; all the

police cannot be bloodthirsty. The public needs to recognise the role of the police and end the

prejudices framed towards the government, our responsibility in advocating for peaceful conflict

resolutions is significant than all the blames we may use to tarnish the security personnel.

Unnecessary demonstrations that involve violence could easily rupture the police officers

emotions and result in chaos; this can end with people taking up personal responsibilities.

Conclusion

The government should not be viewed as infallible in case of police brutality; they must

be ready to provide solutions to all the parties involved. Public forums involving endless and

healthy discussions between the state, the police and the civilians should be encouraged. Judicial

adjustments and police organisation are critical in allowing all the stakeholders to stop police

brutality.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Paper type

Deadline

Page count

550 words

Total price: $ 15.00

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Ian McGregor

UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Shannon Williams

Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

Argumentive essay on suicide

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

Ian McGregor

Shannon Williams