PSYCHOANALYSIS                                                                                                      4 
 
According  to  this  author,  psychoanalysis  does  not  particularly  have  the  requisite  theoretical 
capacity and vigor to enable it to stand questioning as it regards its efficacy and grounding. In 
other  words,  there  is  no  reliable  evidence  yet  on  whether  the  application  of  this  approach 
generates positive outcomes. However, O'Loughlin (2016) observes that the framework can be 
polished to become a better idea and that the reason why its founder Freud instituted a secret 
committee  in  1912  that  was  mandated  with  the  task  of  policing  doctrinal  orthodoxy  of  this 
theory. Perhaps, the ideas of Chancer (2013) can be borrowed to reinforce this theory and its 
application for better results.  
Holmes, J. (2013). Review of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Therapies: Theories of  
  psychotherapy series. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(1), 102-104. 
  In  this  work,  the  author  Holmes  (2013)  focuses  on  analyzing  the  achievements, 
techniques  and  problems  associated  with  the  use  of  psychoanalytic  therapy  in  treatment    of 
mental  health  disorders  particularly  bulimia,  depression  and  relationship  issues.  Tracing  the 
history of psychoanalytic consideration and ensuing movement, he notes that the theory has been 
refined  to  become  influential  over  the  years.  However,  the  inherent  culturally  conservative 
tendencies within this theory have been the cause of its historical tension between the political 
and subversive progressive threats in psychoanalysis. This author’s argument deviates from the 
opinion raised by others presented here by stating that modern developments in psychoanalysis 
can have a potential vital and contrastive function on the future of the mental health system.  
This is despite the controversies which the theory has exhibited at the moment.  
Boag, S. (2006). Freudian repression, the common view, and pathological science, Review of  
  General Psychology, 10(1), pp.74-86