PSYCHOANALYSIS 4
According to this author, psychoanalysis does not particularly have the requisite theoretical
capacity and vigor to enable it to stand questioning as it regards its efficacy and grounding. In
other words, there is no reliable evidence yet on whether the application of this approach
generates positive outcomes. However, O'Loughlin (2016) observes that the framework can be
polished to become a better idea and that the reason why its founder Freud instituted a secret
committee in 1912 that was mandated with the task of policing doctrinal orthodoxy of this
theory. Perhaps, the ideas of Chancer (2013) can be borrowed to reinforce this theory and its
application for better results.
Holmes, J. (2013). Review of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Therapies: Theories of
psychotherapy series. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(1), 102-104.
In this work, the author Holmes (2013) focuses on analyzing the achievements,
techniques and problems associated with the use of psychoanalytic therapy in treatment of
mental health disorders particularly bulimia, depression and relationship issues. Tracing the
history of psychoanalytic consideration and ensuing movement, he notes that the theory has been
refined to become influential over the years. However, the inherent culturally conservative
tendencies within this theory have been the cause of its historical tension between the political
and subversive progressive threats in psychoanalysis. This author’s argument deviates from the
opinion raised by others presented here by stating that modern developments in psychoanalysis
can have a potential vital and contrastive function on the future of the mental health system.
This is despite the controversies which the theory has exhibited at the moment.
Boag, S. (2006). Freudian repression, the common view, and pathological science, Review of
General Psychology, 10(1), pp.74-86