Surname 1
Instructor’s name:
Bureaucracy is the part of a system that places importance on particular aspects of the
community that are integrated into public policy. Bureaucracy can be said to be more than a
system where the public can exercise some control over the government decisions. According to
Weber, bureaucracy is made rational by the fact that is a controlled decision made from
knowledge, expertise and technical competence. Weber defined bureaucracy as a method
through which the state exercised its authority over the masses (Christensen). It is a real type of a
particular form of administration placing importance on critical aspects or characteristics and
showing real logical consequences and correlates. It is an ideal model within which an
organization is set up.
People in a bureaucracy are separated into various levels of importance. The differences
are defined in the positions of offices and different responsibilities that are given in the said
roles. People in a bureaucracy take levels of authority very seriously, and the hierarchy system is
also very complicated, and due to having many different levels, they have an extremely
differentiated structure of power. In a bureaucratic system, there is little room for personal
feelings such as friendliness or being sympathetic. This is because the rights n duties of the
people are preferred than the personal beliefs. The rules of the workplace are considered the most
critical aspect of conducting business. People who are working in a bureaucrat system are
Surname 2
controlled by the rules and the regulations of the place as opposed to being controlled by bosses
and leaders. Workers in such a system are not flexible, and so are their salaries. This method has
well-defined rules of how to construct their business and deal with any problem. Bureaucracies
have very distinct levels of employees, and they only follow the rules of those one level above
Individuals who work for legal organizations, from abnormal state directors and
administrators to administrative staff, are known as officials. To maintain the concept of rules
taking importance over personal feelings, the people in a bureaucracy do not form close personal
friendships. People are treated as cases as opposed to individuals, and they are very impersonal
to the public. They behave as though they are not themselves but rather what the system requires
them to be. The decisions made in this kind of a system had to be in line with the rules and
regulations that are present in the documents of the organization. The workers in this type of a
system perform a duty dependent on the rules even if they are carried out without any
consideration for the people.
Individuals who work for legal organizations, from abnormal state directors and
administrators to administrative staff, are known as officials. The administrator of a substantial
urban school locale is a civil servant, similar to the nurses, bookkeepers, security guards and
instructors. In spite of this famous observation, bureaucracy is essential for large legislative
offices to work and for this particular reason, all bureaucracies share similar qualities, including
hierarchical organization, formal standards, and specialization. When it comes to specialty,
Laborers in an organization perform particular assignments that call for expertise from training.
Personnel that is trained can fulfill their occupations efficiently.
Surname 3
The Middlesex County College fits the description of a traditional method of bureaucracy
in that the tutors are not meant to form personal relationships with students. There are a set of
rules that guide the way they are to conduct themselves. Any breach of these laws is likely to get
them fired. This is because of the nature of their work. Any compromise with a student would
probably lead to damaging results such as fake result to even favoritism in class activities. The
tutors only listen to the administration of the school. Whenever there is a problem in the school,
there is a set of rules that guide how the particular problem would be solved. Students can be
involved in the making of these rules so that the institution can be more student-friendly. When
they are given the option of taking part in making these rules, then they are bound to feel more
connected to the school and will be in a better position to follow the rules.
Moreover, College administration is the framework through which we, as the
understudies, accomplish our training. The reason for school training is for the quest for higher
and better learning; in any case, bureaucratic issues in learning institutions can restrict one's
instructive experience because of complexities inside the framework. In MCC let’s take a look
on concentrate issues, for example, students fees, size of the school, the faculty members and
how they interact with the students and innovation as the center bureaucratic issues and responds
in due order regarding the MCC.
In addition, different obligations include: showing assessment of employees, assistant
enrollment, coaching/preparing, settling understudies issues, transcript assessment, departmental
exercises, ordering or planning arranging "best in class" inquire about instruments, course level
and program level appraisal, educational modules improvement, investigate venture
improvement, driving current activities, supervision of staff, institutional administrations,
Surname 4
institutional progression, effort, and office/lab administration. The plan for execution to make
MCC a better student-centered institution
First, to help the students to attain the best regarding knowledge, all students in need
ought to meet their lecturers and their academic counselor every semester then have their guide
approve courses before they enroll one approach to guarantee understudies are takin and
pursuing the right courses. Besides, MCC all students need signatures and marks. Names or
Marks for dropping any course, pulling back from any course, evolving majors, and so on. Once
more, this might be moderately simple for full-time understudies frequently on the campus
grounds. However, it is an additional worry for grown-up understudies who are within the
campus less regularly. By and by, to help solve this problem of, MCC will require exploration of
an electronic correspondence alternatives.
Inter-Racial and Inter-Religious Marriages
The primary purpose of marriage is for a man and woman to be emotionally connected
and a commitment made in the presence of God and family. It is a commitment between two
people to stay together until death do them part. Even though inter-racial marriages are common
in the world today, they are mostly influenced by external factors that work to bring
confrontation and disagreement in marriages (Rowland 82). Different cultures have significantly
different moral and ethical values that play a crucial role in the perception of the individual about
the family and societal lifestyle. In trying to blend these lifestyles, it is probable that problems
and conflicts may occur. It takes a lot of effort for two cultures to be combined successfully.
Inter-religious marriages have also become more common than they were in the past and usually
occur when one person converts to the other person's religion. Some families, however, are
known to follow their respective beliefs even after they get married.
Surname 5
Americans today likewise are more averse to restrict a nearby relative wedding somebody
of another ethnic or racial background. Presently, there is a decline in marriages among the non-
blacks: similarly, the general numbers cover noteworthy sexual orientation holes inside some
racial gatherings. Among black’s generation, men are significantly more likely than ladies to
wed somebody of other race. Asian ladies are considerably more likely than Asian men to wed
somebody of an alternative race (Wendy). Native Americans have the most astounding
interracial marriage rate among all single-race gatherings. Ladies are marginally more prone to
"wed out" than similar men in this gathering: 61 percent of American Indian females newly
wedded married outside their race, contrasted with fifty-four percent of freshly married
American Indian men.
When a white person gets married to a person of a different race, most of the time, they
have similar levels of income and the same levels of education. This way, they will both be at the
same level of understanding and have fewer things to fight about or add on to their conflicts. A
successful marriage is one where there is an understanding of the couple, and both recognize the
problems present and come up with a way of solving them. By understanding the issues, they
face they are in a much better position to address them. A correlation of later and more
established relational unions demonstrates that having a life partner of a similar religion might be
less critical to many Americans currently than it was decades back.
A large number of these current inter-religious relational unions are amongst Christians
and the faithfully unaffiliated (in some cases known as "nones") (Cathy). Of all the grown-ups in
the United States, who wedded since 2010, very nearly one-in-five are in relational unions
between a Christian and a faithfully unaffiliated mate. Separation is a factor in decreasing the
offer of grown-ups who are at present hitched contrasted and 50 years back. Separation rates
Surname 6
have leveled off in the previous two decades in the wake of moving through the 19th century, so
marriage separations assume to a lesser extent apart than what it used to. Rates of divorce have
been on a decrease for the past few decades.
Additionally, specialists trust that the present rates pattern may decrease moreover in the
next few years as an ever-increasing number of couples’ lean toward a live-in relationship a sort
of relationship or engagement where couples reside together without marrying but as partners
(Wendy). The divorce rates among inter-racial and inter-religious couples are higher than
couples of the same race. Most of the divorces stem from the being unable to blend the two
cultures resulting in the two not understanding each other fully. Others have had to split as their
partner is unable to understand and accept their way of life. However, it is important that couples
understand one another fully and discuss these issues before getting married. Discussing will
solve any problems in future.
Successful marriages are only strengthened through various factors that dictates longevity
in any said marriage. As mentioned, discussing issues with your partner constitutes proper
communication. Gottman (1994), suggests that learning how to argue between couples is a good
approach in improving any relationship while a similar study showed that couples who have
mastered less aggressive behaviors towards each other are able to reduce the chances of divorces
or separation. Good communication creates increased levels of accommodation and it involves
expressing negative cognitions as well as emotions in suppressed and diplomatic manner.
A successful marriage is predicted by partners who will be able to be in a commitment
based on support and love for each other to satisfy their objectives and goals to empower each
different to add to the financial and to their family welfare. Presumably, a successful marriage is
predicted by a family that is joined by adoration as that family will persist anything; cherish,
Surname 7
trust and solidarity are the critical components of a fruitful marriage. Love isn't ownership; one
doesn’t claim his/her accomplice, give support and love upon enabling each partner to be the best
he/she can be. As I would see it, I imagine that a good marriage is predicted by duty, a
legitimate, honest desires from the two individuals to influence it to work.
Communism, Capitalism, and Socialism
A financial framework comprises of the foundations and the technique by which assets
are apportioned, and items and administrations are circulated. Monetary structures contrast
essentially in who claims the components of generation, how resource allocation is coordinated
and the technique used to organize all economic activities. The essential refinement between the
diverse frameworks is how much the legislature takes an interest in the economy (Gregson, 56).
Communism is an economic system where the government has control of all the financial
resources in the country and decides how it will allocate all the resources to the citizens of the
country. Capitalism is an economic system where few people own the factors of production and
those who not have these resources work for the capitalists so they can earn a living. In a
capitalist economy, all the companies use the market forces to maximize their profits. In basic
terms, Capitalism is a social framework given the standard of or rights of all individuals.
Politically, it implies to the Laissez-faire system. Legitimately it is an arrangement of laws that
are objective. Financially, when such flexibility is connected to the circle of creation, its outcome
is the free-showcase. Here the production factors are owned privately; financial exchanges occur
in business sectors, where purchasers and dealers associate and lastly workers and organizations
are allowed to seek after their self-intrigue.
Surname 8
Socialism, on the other hand, is a cross between communism and capitalism. Socialists
push for government-owned companies where the government can get maximum profits and
distribute the resources to the people (Rosser 53). Consequently, socialism advocates a ridiculous
society, where the administration controls all methods for generation and dissemination of
merchandise, so the issue of private property does not exist here because every person is a
worker and everybody will receive similar rewards and thrive similarly (Moss, 59-90).
Moreover, communism is otherwise called "Marxism." Marx trusted that a genuinely
idealistic culture must be stateless and classless. To free the lower class of people, Marx
presumed that the administration ought to control all methods for creation with the goal that
nobody could exceed any other individual by profiting. The government claims the majority of
the production factors upon choosing the resource allocation and what services and products
ought to be provided (Gregson, 60). Capitalism and Socialism are both similar in the way that
market forces are used to maximize profits for the companies. Communism and socialism are
identical in the way that the resources are distributed to the society equally. The significant
difference between a capitalist system and a communist system is that a capitalist is each
company seeks to make profits and do not share out to the public as it is with communism.
Furthermore, despite the fact that all them could share some similarities, we have some
major’s differences between the three economic philosophies. To begin with, socialism is based
on the economic system while communism is both political and economical while capitalist
usually coexists with an assortment of legislative frameworks, including democratic, anarchism,
direct democracy and dictatorship. Also, another difference is that under capitalism, economic
resources are overseen and controlled by the general population itself through cooperatives or
Surname 9
gatherings but in communism, administration and control reside on a couple of individuals in an
only dictator party.
Next, in capitalism, Capital is claimed, worked, and exchanged to produce benefits for
private proprietors or investors. In socialist, wealth and riches are distributed to the general
population in light of a person's productive endeavors while communists subcontract riches
given a person's needs (Moss, 59-90). Under capitalism, Competition for responsibility drives all
economic activities and makes a value framework that decides asset distribution; benefits are
reinvested back into the economy. Also, socialists can claim individual properties while
communists the story is the opposite. Be that as it may, an industrialist, the production methods
are exclusive and worked for a private benefit. This drives motivating forces for makers to take
part in the financial action. Socialism enables the free enterprise to exist in its middle while
communism tries to dispose of private enterprises. The capitalist is different as it can survive
together with an assortment of political frameworks.
A perfect community would be one with all the system combined in an equal manner. A
perfect society, therefore, would embrace the socialist economy where all the people have access
to resources courtesy of the government. The government works hard to ensure that all the
people regardless of their income have access to the most basic needs. This will be a much better
society than one where everyone is meant to care for themselves. It is also likely to make the
people feel included and have a sense of responsibility in building he nation. However, it is
important that all able-bodied people take part in the building process to reduce joyriders and
other feeling like they are being taken advantage of by working hard. Free enterprise is the best
type of government we have encountered in the universe so far because it is in the nearest
Surname 10
arrangement with the laws of truth and the universe. A state that mirrors freedom and openness
and one that advocates integrity and responsibility.
Surname 11
Works Cited
Caryle Murphy, "Interfaith marriage is common in U.S., particularly among the recently wed." 2
June 2015, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/02/interfaith-marriage/.
Cathy Sandeen, "How Operational Efficiency Is Good For Everyone at the Institution." 6 Oct.
2014, evolllution.com/opinions/audio-operational-efficiency-good-institution/.
Christensen, Thomas. Autonomy and Regulation. Coping with Agencies in the Modern State.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and
marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Gregson, J. "4. Socialism and communism." Politics Trove, 2017,
Min, Pyong-Gap. Asian Americans: contemporary trends and issues. New York: Pine Forge
Press, 2006.
Moss, W. "Capitalism, Socialism, and Communism." An Age of Progress?, pp. 59-90,
Rosser, Marriana. Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy. New York: MIT
Press, 2003.
Rowland, Fryer. ""Guess Who's Been Coming to Dinner? Trends in Interracial Marriage over the
20th Century." Journal of Economic Perspectives. (2007): 71-90.
Wendy Wang, "Interracial marriage: Who is ?marrying out??" 12 June 2015,
Surname 12

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.