Bureaucracy | EssayIvy.com

Surname 1

Name:

Instructor’s name:

Course:

Date:

Bureaucracy

Bureaucracy is the part of a system that places importance on particular aspects of the

community that are integrated into public policy. Bureaucracy can be said to be more than a

system where the public can exercise some control over the government decisions. According to

Weber, bureaucracy is made rational by the fact that is a controlled decision made from

knowledge, expertise and technical competence. Weber defined bureaucracy as a method

through which the state exercised its authority over the masses (Christensen). It is a real type of a

particular form of administration placing importance on critical aspects or characteristics and

showing real logical consequences and correlates. It is an ideal model within which an

organization is set up.

People in a bureaucracy are separated into various levels of importance. The differences

are defined in the positions of offices and different responsibilities that are given in the said

roles. People in a bureaucracy take levels of authority very seriously, and the hierarchy system is

also very complicated, and due to having many different levels, they have an extremely

differentiated structure of power. In a bureaucratic system, there is little room for personal

feelings such as friendliness or being sympathetic. This is because the rights n duties of the

people are preferred than the personal beliefs. The rules of the workplace are considered the most

critical aspect of conducting business. People who are working in a bureaucrat system are

Surname 2

controlled by the rules and the regulations of the place as opposed to being controlled by bosses

and leaders. Workers in such a system are not flexible, and so are their salaries. This method has

well-defined rules of how to construct their business and deal with any problem. Bureaucracies

have very distinct levels of employees, and they only follow the rules of those one level above

them.

Individuals who work for legal organizations, from abnormal state directors and

administrators to administrative staff, are known as officials. To maintain the concept of rules

taking importance over personal feelings, the people in a bureaucracy do not form close personal

friendships. People are treated as cases as opposed to individuals, and they are very impersonal

to the public. They behave as though they are not themselves but rather what the system requires

them to be. The decisions made in this kind of a system had to be in line with the rules and

regulations that are present in the documents of the organization. The workers in this type of a

system perform a duty dependent on the rules even if they are carried out without any

consideration for the people.

Individuals who work for legal organizations, from abnormal state directors and

administrators to administrative staff, are known as officials. The administrator of a substantial

urban school locale is a civil servant, similar to the nurses, bookkeepers, security guards and

instructors. In spite of this famous observation, bureaucracy is essential for large legislative

offices to work and for this particular reason, all bureaucracies share similar qualities, including

hierarchical organization, formal standards, and specialization. When it comes to specialty,

Laborers in an organization perform particular assignments that call for expertise from training.

Personnel that is trained can fulfill their occupations efficiently.

Surname 3

The Middlesex County College fits the description of a traditional method of bureaucracy

in that the tutors are not meant to form personal relationships with students. There are a set of

rules that guide the way they are to conduct themselves. Any breach of these laws is likely to get

them fired. This is because of the nature of their work. Any compromise with a student would

probably lead to damaging results such as fake result to even favoritism in class activities. The

tutors only listen to the administration of the school. Whenever there is a problem in the school,

there is a set of rules that guide how the particular problem would be solved. Students can be

involved in the making of these rules so that the institution can be more student-friendly. When

they are given the option of taking part in making these rules, then they are bound to feel more

connected to the school and will be in a better position to follow the rules.

Moreover, College administration is the framework through which we, as the

understudies, accomplish our training. The reason for school training is for the quest for higher

and better learning; in any case, bureaucratic issues in learning institutions can restrict one's

instructive experience because of complexities inside the framework. In MCC let’s take a look

on concentrate issues, for example, students fees, size of the school, the faculty members and

how they interact with the students and innovation as the center bureaucratic issues and responds

in due order regarding the MCC.

In addition, different obligations include: showing assessment of employees, assistant

enrollment, coaching/preparing, settling understudies issues, transcript assessment, departmental

exercises, ordering or planning arranging "best in class" inquire about instruments, course level

and program level appraisal, educational modules improvement, investigate venture

improvement, driving current activities, supervision of staff, institutional administrations,

Surname 4

institutional progression, effort, and office/lab administration. The plan for execution to make

MCC a better student-centered institution

First, to help the students to attain the best regarding knowledge, all students in need

ought to meet their lecturers and their academic counselor every semester then have their guide

approve courses before they enroll one approach to guarantee understudies are takin and

pursuing the right courses. Besides, MCC all students need signatures and marks. Names or

Marks for dropping any course, pulling back from any course, evolving majors, and so on. Once

more, this might be moderately simple for full-time understudies frequently on the campus

grounds. However, it is an additional worry for grown-up understudies who are within the

campus less regularly. By and by, to help solve this problem of, MCC will require exploration of

an electronic correspondence alternatives.

Inter-Racial and Inter-Religious Marriages

The primary purpose of marriage is for a man and woman to be emotionally connected

and a commitment made in the presence of God and family. It is a commitment between two

people to stay together until death do them part. Even though inter-racial marriages are common

in the world today, they are mostly influenced by external factors that work to bring

confrontation and disagreement in marriages (Rowland 82). Different cultures have significantly

different moral and ethical values that play a crucial role in the perception of the individual about

the family and societal lifestyle. In trying to blend these lifestyles, it is probable that problems

and conflicts may occur. It takes a lot of effort for two cultures to be combined successfully.

Inter-religious marriages have also become more common than they were in the past and usually

occur when one person converts to the other person's religion. Some families, however, are

known to follow their respective beliefs even after they get married.

Surname 5

Americans today likewise are more averse to restrict a nearby relative wedding somebody

of another ethnic or racial background. Presently, there is a decline in marriages among the non-

blacks: similarly, the general numbers cover noteworthy sexual orientation holes inside some

racial gatherings. Among black’s generation, men are significantly more likely than ladies to

wed somebody of other race. Asian ladies are considerably more likely than Asian men to wed

somebody of an alternative race (Wendy). Native Americans have the most astounding

interracial marriage rate among all single-race gatherings. Ladies are marginally more prone to

"wed out" than similar men in this gathering: 61 percent of American Indian females newly

wedded married outside their race, contrasted with fifty-four percent of freshly married

American Indian men.

When a white person gets married to a person of a different race, most of the time, they

have similar levels of income and the same levels of education. This way, they will both be at the

same level of understanding and have fewer things to fight about or add on to their conflicts. A

successful marriage is one where there is an understanding of the couple, and both recognize the

problems present and come up with a way of solving them. By understanding the issues, they

face they are in a much better position to address them. A correlation of later and more

established relational unions demonstrates that having a life partner of a similar religion might be

less critical to many Americans currently than it was decades back.

A large number of these current inter-religious relational unions are amongst Christians

and the faithfully unaffiliated (in some cases known as "nones") (Cathy). Of all the grown-ups in

the United States, who wedded since 2010, very nearly one-in-five are in relational unions

between a Christian and a faithfully unaffiliated mate. Separation is a factor in decreasing the

offer of grown-ups who are at present hitched contrasted and 50 years back. Separation rates

Surname 6

have leveled off in the previous two decades in the wake of moving through the 19th century, so

marriage separations assume to a lesser extent apart than what it used to. Rates of divorce have

been on a decrease for the past few decades.

Additionally, specialists trust that the present rates pattern may decrease moreover in the

next few years as an ever-increasing number of couples’ lean toward a live-in relationship a sort

of relationship or engagement where couples reside together without marrying but as partners

(Wendy). The divorce rates among inter-racial and inter-religious couples are higher than

couples of the same race. Most of the divorces stem from the being unable to blend the two

cultures resulting in the two not understanding each other fully. Others have had to split as their

partner is unable to understand and accept their way of life. However, it is important that couples

understand one another fully and discuss these issues before getting married. Discussing will

solve any problems in future.

Successful marriages are only strengthened through various factors that dictates longevity

in any said marriage. As mentioned, discussing issues with your partner constitutes proper

communication. Gottman (1994), suggests that learning how to argue between couples is a good

approach in improving any relationship while a similar study showed that couples who have

mastered less aggressive behaviors towards each other are able to reduce the chances of divorces

or separation. Good communication creates increased levels of accommodation and it involves

expressing negative cognitions as well as emotions in suppressed and diplomatic manner.

A successful marriage is predicted by partners who will be able to be in a commitment

based on support and love for each other to satisfy their objectives and goals to empower each

different to add to the financial and to their family welfare. Presumably, a successful marriage is

predicted by a family that is joined by adoration as that family will persist anything; cherish,

Surname 7

trust and solidarity are the critical components of a fruitful marriage. Love isn't ownership; one

doesn’t claim his/her accomplice, give support and love upon enabling each partner to be the best

he/she can be. As I would see it, I imagine that a good marriage is predicted by duty, a

legitimate, honest desires from the two individuals to influence it to work.

Communism, Capitalism, and Socialism

A financial framework comprises of the foundations and the technique by which assets

are apportioned, and items and administrations are circulated. Monetary structures contrast

essentially in who claims the components of generation, how resource allocation is coordinated

and the technique used to organize all economic activities. The essential refinement between the

diverse frameworks is how much the legislature takes an interest in the economy (Gregson, 56).

Communism is an economic system where the government has control of all the financial

resources in the country and decides how it will allocate all the resources to the citizens of the

country. Capitalism is an economic system where few people own the factors of production and

those who not have these resources work for the capitalists so they can earn a living. In a

capitalist economy, all the companies use the market forces to maximize their profits. In basic

terms, Capitalism is a social framework given the standard of or rights of all individuals.

Politically, it implies to the Laissez-faire system. Legitimately it is an arrangement of laws that

are objective. Financially, when such flexibility is connected to the circle of creation, its outcome

is the free-showcase. Here the production factors are owned privately; financial exchanges occur

in business sectors, where purchasers and dealers associate and lastly workers and organizations

are allowed to seek after their self-intrigue.

Surname 8

Socialism, on the other hand, is a cross between communism and capitalism. Socialists

push for government-owned companies where the government can get maximum profits and

distribute the resources to the people (Rosser 53). Consequently, socialism advocates a ridiculous

society, where the administration controls all methods for generation and dissemination of

merchandise, so the issue of private property does not exist here because every person is a

worker and everybody will receive similar rewards and thrive similarly (Moss, 59-90).

Moreover, communism is otherwise called "Marxism." Marx trusted that a genuinely

idealistic culture must be stateless and classless. To free the lower class of people, Marx

presumed that the administration ought to control all methods for creation with the goal that

nobody could exceed any other individual by profiting. The government claims the majority of

the production factors upon choosing the resource allocation and what services and products

ought to be provided (Gregson, 60). Capitalism and Socialism are both similar in the way that

market forces are used to maximize profits for the companies. Communism and socialism are

identical in the way that the resources are distributed to the society equally. The significant

difference between a capitalist system and a communist system is that a capitalist is each

company seeks to make profits and do not share out to the public as it is with communism.

Furthermore, despite the fact that all them could share some similarities, we have some

major’s differences between the three economic philosophies. To begin with, socialism is based

on the economic system while communism is both political and economical while capitalist

usually coexists with an assortment of legislative frameworks, including democratic, anarchism,

direct democracy and dictatorship. Also, another difference is that under capitalism, economic

resources are overseen and controlled by the general population itself through cooperatives or

Surname 9

gatherings but in communism, administration and control reside on a couple of individuals in an

only dictator party.

Next, in capitalism, Capital is claimed, worked, and exchanged to produce benefits for

private proprietors or investors. In socialist, wealth and riches are distributed to the general

population in light of a person's productive endeavors while communists subcontract riches

given a person's needs (Moss, 59-90). Under capitalism, Competition for responsibility drives all

economic activities and makes a value framework that decides asset distribution; benefits are

reinvested back into the economy. Also, socialists can claim individual properties while

communists the story is the opposite. Be that as it may, an industrialist, the production methods

are exclusive and worked for a private benefit. This drives motivating forces for makers to take

part in the financial action. Socialism enables the free enterprise to exist in its middle while

communism tries to dispose of private enterprises. The capitalist is different as it can survive

together with an assortment of political frameworks.

A perfect community would be one with all the system combined in an equal manner. A

perfect society, therefore, would embrace the socialist economy where all the people have access

to resources courtesy of the government. The government works hard to ensure that all the

people regardless of their income have access to the most basic needs. This will be a much better

society than one where everyone is meant to care for themselves. It is also likely to make the

people feel included and have a sense of responsibility in building he nation. However, it is

important that all able-bodied people take part in the building process to reduce joyriders and

other feeling like they are being taken advantage of by working hard. Free enterprise is the best

type of government we have encountered in the universe so far because it is in the nearest

Surname 10

arrangement with the laws of truth and the universe. A state that mirrors freedom and openness

and one that advocates integrity and responsibility.

Surname 11

Works Cited

Caryle Murphy, "Interfaith marriage is common in U.S., particularly among the recently wed." 2

June 2015, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/02/interfaith-marriage/.

Cathy Sandeen, "How Operational Efficiency Is Good For Everyone at the Institution." 6 Oct.

2014, evolllution.com/opinions/audio-operational-efficiency-good-institution/.

Christensen, Thomas. Autonomy and Regulation. Coping with Agencies in the Modern State.

Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and

marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence

Gregson, J. "4. Socialism and communism." Politics Trove, 2017,

doi:10.1093/hepl/9780198727859.003.0004.

Min, Pyong-Gap. Asian Americans: contemporary trends and issues. New York: Pine Forge

Press, 2006.

Moss, W. "Capitalism, Socialism, and Communism." An Age of Progress?, pp. 59-90,

doi:10.7135/upo9781843313502.007.

Rosser, Marriana. Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy. New York: MIT

Press, 2003.

Rowland, Fryer. ""Guess Who's Been Coming to Dinner? Trends in Interracial Marriage over the

20th Century." Journal of Economic Perspectives. (2007): 71-90.

Wendy Wang, "Interracial marriage: Who is ?marrying out??" 12 June 2015,

www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/12/interracial-marriage-who-is-marrying-out/.

Surname 12

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Paper type

Deadline

Page count

550 words

Total price: $ 15.00

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Ian McGregor

UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Shannon Williams

Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."