Business Law

SURNAME 1

Student’s name

Institution’s name

Professor’s name

Date

BUSINESS LAW

The case in question was between the Milwaukee Association of commerce and the

county of Milwaukee. It is presented before judges on 5

December the year 2005 to rule on the

case that has been tabled by the plaintiff, the Association of Commerce in Milwaukee against the

defendant, the county of Milwaukee. Posner was the circuit judge who presided over the case

that was presented in the Supreme Court after it was heard in the district court in Milwaukee.

The plaintiff wants the court to rule on the case in the favor of the enforcement of the ordinance

that had been appropriated by the county of Milwaukee. The ordinance was appropriated by the

county of Milwaukee before the association of commerce. This was the general ordinance in the

Milwaukee County and was appropriated by the national labor relations act in Milwaukee. The

case took place in the Seventh circuit of the court of appeal in the United States of America.

The fact of the case was that the general ordinance of the Milwaukee County in the

United States of America operated under the protection of the law. This business law was put in

place because the county of Milwaukee was tasked with providing services to the old persons in

the county as well as those who are disabled. The kind of services that the county was supposed

to render to these groups of people was transport services as well as other general services. The

business law that the county has contravened concerns peace negotiations between those who are

SURNAME 2

offering the transport and other services to the disabled on behalf of the county. They are also

offering the services to those who are elderly in the county. What the county has failed to do is to

involve those persons who have been hired to offer the services on behalf of it in peace

negations. The ordinance is clear and requires that anyone who is hired by the county to offer

services to the elderly and the disabled in the county to be involved in peace negations before

being hired.

By failing to involve the hired personalities in peace negations is going against the

general ordinance which denies any guarantee of peace in the dealing. The county has therefore

worked against an ordinance that is supposed to guide the county on its operations thereby

breaking the larger business law. The association of commerce of Milwaukee therefore wants the

court to charge the county with breaking the ordinance and effectively order the enforcement of

the ordinance. The case has already been heard on lower courts in Milwaukee, which have found

the county guilty of breaking the ordinance. The case in proceeding at this particular moment is a

petition in the Supreme Court in Milwaukee and it still upholds the case as it was ruled by the

lower courts that heard the case previously.

The law element in this case is the fact that there is an ordinance that governs how peace

negotiations must be made. The ordinance regulates how individuals or groups participate in the

rendering of services on behave of the county of Milwaukee. It calls for all who are to offer

services to attend meetings meant for peace negations to ensure that they are even better placed

to vote in other persons or groups who are to be hired by the county of Milwaukee to offer

services such as transport and general services to the old people and those who live with

disabilities in the county. This is an element of business law and the association of commerce in

SURNAME 3

Milwaukee is convinced that the county has contravened this business law and therefore

answerable for its negligence of the law that it is bound to.

The plaintiff accused the defendant of having broken the ordinance that called for peace

negotiations by those hired by the county to offer services. The defendant on the other hand

argued by blaming the private sector for the mess that was being mentioned. The defendant

claimed that although it, the county of Milwaukee had invested a lot in the private sector to offer

the so mentioned services to the mentioned group, they failed to operate within the general

ordinance of the county of Milwaukee. The defendant used the private sector to defend itself

although the court upheld the ruling that was made against the county.

The decision that was made by the Supreme Court over this case was final and was

upheld, finding the county guilty of breaking the general ordinance in Milwaukee. The business

law was based on peace negotiations that everyone hired by the county was to be subject to. The

judgment was quite satisfying because the Supreme Court relied on the evidence that was tabled

before it to make the ruling. This case was interesting to follow as it was about a sensitive area of

business law. It was interesting especially the point where the defendant had to defend

themselves by blaming the private sector for the offence committed.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Paper type

Deadline

Page count

550 words

Total price: $ 15.00

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Ian McGregor

UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Shannon Williams

Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

Ian McGregor

Shannon Williams