3
CASE STUDY
Issues
The issue of the case revolves around the fact that the consumers must accept the terms
stipulated by the term of use. In this assertion, the forum of selection clause is included. Also, in
this assertion; no bargains, choice and adjustments are made.
Reasons
While imposing her appeal, Ms Douez was substantial in the way he reasoned while
imposing the plea. The assessment of the court case, reveals the fact that Ms Douez had
presented a solid reason for the Court. In his assertion, he rebuked the forum assertions that were
made by the court. The judge made his elucidation of s4 which influenced the decisions made on
this deduction.
Ratio
Due to the above-mentioned facts and reasons, the judge decided that the respondent was
legally wrong. This is because the decisions and actions made were against the elucidations
made by the Privacy Act. Currently, there are debates that revolve around the issue of imposing
the forum assortment clause. Consequently, the decisions made are in agreement with the plea
made in CA41917. Legally, Ms Douez has the liberty to bring the action into California because
the respondent has agreed with the sustenance of the original action.
Through this case, it is clear that Facebook has demonstrated that the forum selection
clause has to be reinforced. Besides, the case has revealed the fact that D has not succeeded in
establishing a strong clause. Through this case, the readers have been introduced to the subject of
confidentiality and privacy of information. As at now, the subject of use and disclose of secured