CASE STUDY ANALYSIS 2
Case Study Analysis
Discussion 1: Fired Over Facebook
Post
The case provides a critical illustration of how employers optimize their search to
monitor employees’ behaviors inside and outside the workplace based on the increased use of
social media to enable effective communication with others. Evidently, the surveillance of the
social media use tends to generate intriguing questions on the desire for the organizations to
retain their reputation or image, as well as the need for the employees to maintain a specific
degree of privacy. Based on this, the case highlights attributes in which organizational duties
might conflict with the personal rights.
Notably, I agree with the management’s decision to fire Ashley (Gossett, 2013). First,
employers have the opportunity to fire employees whenever they deem necessary. The protection
of the rights in the constitution only applies to the public sector. The management must design
specific rules and regulations at the workplace. Additionally, the management or employer has
the right to decide on who to become part of the organization. From this perspective, in the
protection of the image and reputation, as well as social media use policies, the management is
right in the decision to fire Ashley.
The particular case raises the dilemma in which organizational duties or expectations
conflict with the personal rights, especially the right to privacy (Gossett, 2013). Something about
this makes me feel a bit uncomfortable. For instance, I believe that organizations tend to increase
their search on the social media in recruitment. I will have to watch whatever I post on Facebook
or other social media platforms to ensure that it does not come back to haunt me in any
workplace. From a larger perspective, the issues related to the workplace experiences in which