Charlotte Beers at Ogilvy

Running head: CHARLOTTE BEERS AT OGILVY AND MATHER WORLDWIDE 1
Charlotte Beers at Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide
Name:
Institution:
CHARLOTTE BEERS AT OGILVY AND MATHER WORLDWIDE 2
Question 1
When Beers took over, one of the biggest challenges that she had to overcome internally
was convincing the employees especially the executives of Ogilvy and Mather that she could
deliver the job. The company had a negative perception about outsiders. It did not allow other
people to just come and be part of O & M. One of the employees at one point is heard saying that
“This is an Organization that rejects outsiders.” This is a clear example of an environment that a
person is unwanted. When Beers also took over O & M, she had initially worked for a small
company in Chicago. As such, she had the challenge of convincing the other employees that she
was up to the task. Beers had also not managed multiple offices and at O & M she faced
opposition because they saw her as an inexperienced person.
One of the arguments by the employees against Beers is that she had never worked
outside the United States while O & M was a worldwide company. Beers also faced challenges
externally as shown by how clients did not rate the company. Clients could be seen preferring
other agencies while O & M had all the capabilities to be a better agency than the other entire
Agency in the United States. These challenges challenged Beer’s to change the climate of the
company both against her and also across the employees and clients. One vital measure that she
took to change the climate was bringing executives, clerks and accountants to one table so that
they could plan for the future of a company. Additionally, Beers sent a “Hello” video to all of her
employees. These two measures changed the toxic climate and people soon started to like her
although she had come faced animosity from the employees of O & M initially.
Question 2
CHARLOTTE BEERS AT OGILVY AND MATHER WORLDWIDE 3
The vision of O & M is “To be the agency most valued by those who most value brands.”
This vision to some extent may be confusing to some employees especially the new ones. From
my opinion, the vision is wide and refined. The employees of the company can relate to this
vision at all cost. The vision has a good connection with the employees because it highlights
how they want their work to be appreciated. This is the kind of vision that includes both the
stakeholders and the stakeholders of the company rather than representing only one side or no
side at all but the company itself. When analyzing the vision in terms of the elements of an
effective vision, it can be noted that the vision is future oriented. The vision also is likely to lead
to a better future for the company. What the company wants is to be the most valued
organization. This can only be achieved if all the employees keep walking and delivering quality
services.
The vision can be noted that it sets standards for excellence. It inspires commitment and
supports enthusiasm from the workers. However, it can be noted that the vision does not clarify
the direction or rather purpose of the company. It only states that they want people or rather the
agency to be the most valued. To some extent, the vision portrays an ambition. The ambition is
to emerge the best among the other companies. However, to some extent the vision does not
show ambition. Their vision is limited to what those individuals or companies that value brand.
The vision should have strived to be even better than that. Additionally, the vision does not show
uniqueness. The consoling thing about this vision is that it is simple, the employees can relate to
it, and it can be achieved easily if the employees do their part
Question 3
CHARLOTTE BEERS AT OGILVY AND MATHER WORLDWIDE 4
Despite the fact that the process of crafting or creating the vision was chaotic, messy and
painful as a result of role commitment, Beer and her time competently created a vision that could
guide their operations. As the sixth largest advertisement agency, the team navigated by Beers
was committed to achieving the “just continue doing the same thing, better” vision that was
faced with numerous controversies that called for the need for a clear vision for the company.
Ignorance to the challenges that were present in Brand stewardship significantly impinged on the
vision crafting process. However, the team started by recognizing the need to involve
approximately or members of the Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide organization. This step proved
that every person was significant in giving their opinion about the most appropriate vision
ideologies. After a debate in the meeting discussions as suggested by Wright, agreements were
made. According to Beers, the vision will be adopted after an agreed upon consensus in a
democratic way as a mechanism to increase the worker's loyalty to the vision. The final process
of vision formation was to integrate brainstorming based on three other groups as a strategy to
test and refine their thoughts. The end product of these long vision creation processes was “To be
the most valued agency by those who value brands most.”
According to Kotter’s change management theory establishing a sense of urgency,
creating the guiding coalition and development of a change vision are very basic steps that were
well enacted by Beers. It’s clear that she facilitated a sense of urgency in combating discord,
conflict, disagreement and challenges affecting her leadership. The fact that she gave room for
advice and other people’s opinions made her effective in responding to emerging issues for the
sake of the organization’s success. She opted for managerial collaboration in her struggle to fight
the firm’s faulted autonomous tradition. She minimized autocratic leadership. Thus, she paved
the way for successful guidance and coalition. Beers allowed the process of developing a
CHARLOTTE BEERS AT OGILVY AND MATHER WORLDWIDE 5
transformative vision that was cherished by almost all members of the firm for efficiency in
application. All this affirms that Beers was well knowledgeable of the Kotter’s eight-step model
that she massively applied in her leadership towards achieving the objectives of the firm..
Effectiveness in communication is among the determinants of an organization's success,
no doubt about that. Following this observation, Beers ensured that communication was
universal to accommodate international clients especially mega-agencies. She adopted corporate
communication to achieve globalizations standards of communication. Her communication was
inclusive and transparent to all members for clarity and criticism that could, in turn, enable her to
note any possible challenge that could affect the firm. She attained sufficient communication
strategies in all levels of the enterprise. Beers encouraged visionary communication and
adherence to the firm’s bureaucratic rules as a method of maintaining respect among all workers
and professionals which were a notable change.
Question 4
When creating the vision, some people did not agree with Beers. These workers felt that
the vision of the company was Brand stewardship. Other individuals saw Brand stewardship as
being a tool of achieving other great things. These differences or rather resistance were
controlled by Beers and the executive in three ways. The first way that the resistance was
minimized was by including a larger group in the vision formulation. One of the executives,
Wright commented that “We need to decide collectively what we are going to be. If you have 30
people deciding and 30 people who have bought into the vision, then they have no reason not to
go out and do it (Sackley & Ibarra, 1995). By reasoning with them this way, the executive
CHARLOTTE BEERS AT OGILVY AND MATHER WORLDWIDE 6
managed to minimize or rather manage the potential resistance. The second method used to
manage the resistance was by dividing the employees into three groups.
Beers took part in the process by being the first to place herself in a new group. All the
other employees suddenly became active and joined different groups. By splitting the tasks,
Beers and the executive managed to make the members active and forget the differences that had
made it hard to come up with a vision. Initially, the members had tackled the formation of a
vision as a one big group. However, this proved to be a challenge and splitting them became
effective. The last method was using feedback from the clients on brand stewardship. Using
clients lessened the work of the members or rather employees. The employees therefore were
free to conduct their other work. Some of the people resisted through complaints while others
wanted the organization to use the simple vision “Brand stewardship.” The participants also
argued that they were tired from discussing about the vision for three days straight. They wanted
the executives to stop the discussion.
Question 5
The leadership that Beers possess is transformational. Beers knows how to turn ugly
situations into a comfortable scenario. Initially, she is not wanted by the executive and the
employees. However, she slowly makes her way through the system and at last everyone starts
liking her. Additionally, the company was in a big mess before she arrived. The employees were
using some words to refer to each other. Beers changed this and in her first month, she sent a
“Hello” video to all of her employees. It can also be identified that Beers has a way with her
clients. The clients had at first rated other agency companies above O & M but she also turned
that around and client started taking this company serious once again. When the employees
resisted the change or rather the formulation of the vision for the company, with the help of his
CHARLOTTE BEERS AT OGILVY AND MATHER WORLDWIDE 7
team, they changed the mind of the participants and In the end they managed to formulate a new
vision. Beers can be termed as an exceptional leader that reads situation properly and approaches
each one with care. It can also be identified that she rarely becomes emotional. Beers is a good
leader that should be emulated by other leaders in different organizations.
CHARLOTTE BEERS AT OGILVY AND MATHER WORLDWIDE 8
References
Sackley, N., & Ibarra, H. (1995). Charlotte Beers at Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide (A). Harvard
Business School.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.