CHILDREN WELFARE 5
Patrick versus Doyle Debate
When Patrick found Captain Doyle has abducted Amanda, Patrick and Doyle had a
discussion of contradicting theories and arguments on whether Amanda should be placed in a
new home or return to her custodian. Doyle basing on the quotation above believed that Amanda
should be placed in a new home but Patrick held a contrary opinion. In response to the Doyle,
Patrick argued that he it would be forever haunt him if he left Amanda in Doyle’s custody
without the permission of her guardian and following the relevant legal procedures. Patrick argue
what if Amanda would later accuse him for leaving her in the hands of strange family despite
having been entrusted by her aunt to find her. Patrick was obligated to report Doyle for
abduction and return Amanda back to Helene regardless of the risks of negligence cited by
Doyle.
First, regardless of the religion or cultural beliefs, some laws and rules override the
reason whether done in good faith or not. The action of Doyle kidnapping Amanda was unlawful
and punishment, therefore, Patrick was right to call the police on Doyle. However, personally,
Doyle’s arguments underscores Patrick’s argument basing on the evidence of neglect and abuse
by Helene. Literally, from time in the memorial, children should be under the care of their
parents and guardians, but once the parents fail to sufficiently offer basic needs and treat the
children in accordance to social and legal provisions, they transfer the responsibility to the
society and the government. Every child has right be cared for by biological parents or guardians
so do the parents, but the rights are limited based on the extent of child treatment.
Children have a right to life, liberty, happiness and basic needs hence when a parent fails
to offer them and mistreats the child, it is prudent to place the child with a family or home where
the child grow and develop well (Schene, 1998). Doyle was right, Helene had proven to abuse