Introduction
In this essay, freedom of speech coupled with freedom of expression as a civil liberty
issue are discussed with reference to the case of an article published by The Atlantic. The title of
the article is “The Most Short-sighted Attack on Free Speech in Modern U.S History.” Freedom
of expression falls under the categories of freedoms that the government cannot curtail by any
means possible either by judicial processes or by a change of law. In this essay, the civil liberty
issue identified in the article will be discussed, the constitutional passages that are relevant to this
civil liberty issue discussed, and the argument of both legal sides identified.
What is the Civil Liberty Issue in Question?
The Civil Liberty in question as found in the article is with regard to the freedom of
expression. Freedom of expression stipulates out that one is free to express him or herself out
without the interference of the government or any other entity. One can do so in many of the
forms available like publications, the media, the internet and in the form of art (Londino, 2010).
In the article, “The most short sighted Attack of Free Speech in Modern U.S History”, there is
the narration of how the freedom of speech has been abridged by the government when the same
government that is left with the sole responsibility of implementing and protecting the
constitution is the one undermining people’s right to express themselves freely. On the same
note, from the article, it is evident that the freedom of speech provides a loophole for the hate
speech to thrive “the instances when the Nazis hold demonstrations on the streets with arms,
insulting abuses to the blacks and the Jews, someone had still think of protecting their right to
free speech.”
The article also highlights the critical questions that have lacked answers as far as
freedom of speech is concerned for example, to what extent is the freedom of speech justified
especially when it gets to the point of clearly transforming to hate speech? Citing the instance of
the Nazis marching in the streets of America hulling insults at LGBT and other minorities and
worse, even killing them, the article calls for the law society to reconsider how justified the
freedom of expression is with regards to the first amendment.
The article highlights the views of an attorney, Ken White, who has Civil-libertarian
views and who beliefs that that the constitution should protect hate speech mongers if freedom of
expression is to be felt in the land of America, a nation that is thought to be the ultimate nation of
freedom. This is in response to the fact that those people who advocate for free speech have