COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL AND POST MODERN PLAY THEORIES 2
Comparison of Classical and Post Modern Play Theories
Transformative stages through which every human being undergoes has captured the
interest of social scientists and piqued the interest of other behavioral scholars in equal measure.
Despite being an important part of the human growth process, adulthood stage has interestingly
failed to attract the kind of attention otherwise captured by childhood stage. It goes without
saying that the former stage is naturally riddled with various mysteries that if left unexamined,
can make a proper understanding of how human beings grow and develop be an exercise in
futility. Play, during this particular phase of human life, stands out as one of such mysteries due
to its complexities (Smith, 2010). It is such complexities that have made various scholars come
up with varied theories surrounding play in a bid to offer intellectual theories aimed at exploring
its underlying intrigues. An attempt to examine such theories with a specific focus on comparing
classical and post-modern theories is made herein.
Classical Theories
Classical theories of play came into the limelight during the period between the 19
th
century and early 20
th
century. During this time, behavioral scholars directed their intellectual
focus on what made children behave the way they did and exactly what motivated their choices
during the process (Russ, 2012). Below is an in-depth exploration of the theories.
Surplus Energy
Spencer in his 1875 scholastic line of thought argues that children participate in plays
during their formative years for no apparent reason other than the presence of surplus energy.
The scholar proceeds to give out an extensive discussion of where the energy in question comes
from by reasoning that children posses a reasonable amount of energy at this particular stage.
Nevertheless, they fail to channel such into activities that require the very amounts, or activities