Corporate Strategy 3
supplier power is categorized into the number, size, substation effect, uniqueness and cost
involved in changing. This was among the other four elements induced by buyer, new entrants
and substitution threats, which led to competitive rivalry. This framework is used to analyze the
competition setting for any business. The strength of competition in this case was heightened by
the selective logistic processes. The company faced stiff competition owing to the new retailers
who included the capital investors (Bocken 2017 81). On the other hand, larger sellers posed
great challenge to the company since they enjoyed economies of scale and could sell at lower
prices. This happened in the supported countries yet the products were supplied from only
United Kingdom. The diversity in the market meant the pricing a challenge whose effect was
inevitable. Indeed, only loyal customers could be retained by the company if cheaper and
fashionable designs were introduced.
The supply of the UK designs alone did not penetrate well in the new Arabian customers
in Russia and Asians as well. The discounts that other competitors offered meant that the
company lost customers. The new entrants had come with substitutes especially in the textile
industry. They meant innovation in the fashions at lower costs (Rashid 2016 45). This company
also faced huge competition from other major stores such as the Tesco and ASDA (Johnson 2016
78). These stores have a variety of the products. Mark and spencer had no good capacity to offer
competitive edge over the bigger firms. The threats would as well be associated with the nature
of customers that the company targeted. The huge number was not loyal and shifts were
frequent. For instance, when the company did not accept the credit card, there was a quick switch
which led ta serious deterioration of the company outcomes (Quix and van der Kind 2016 23). In
2016, there was decline in the sales, which was associated with huge supplies due to devaluation
of the textile products.