Db8 | EssayIvy.com

Running head: DB8 1

DB8

Name:

Institution:

Criminal Justice in Criminal Justice 2

DB8

More than often individuals interact with one another. These interactions yield positive

and other times adverse outcomes. In any social setting, such issues are always anticipated, and

for a rational society, they must occur. On the negative extreme, the administration authorities

are charged with the mandate to ensure that law and order are maintained and where necessary

the justice system takes over. The criminal justice system will entail a myriad of processes and

institutions charged with the responsibility to uphold social control in an attempt to deter and

mitigate crime. Those who violate laws always find themselves in the constraints of the law. In

the United States of America, for instance, levels of crime have been escalating over time.

Hence, this calls for measures to ensure that a society coexists in harmony. The primary question

is the role of the government and other law enforcing agencies strive to ensure the crime levels

are minimal.

Over the last two decades, technology advancement has been experienced. Technology is

associated with increased efficiency in the output of any service delivery, and justice is no

exception. Technology both in hard and soft forms has been used to combat crime around the

world. It has seen the streamlining and reduction of crime in several cities around in the United

States for instance. Accessibility of information is an essential aspect in predicting and

combating crime. However, the effectiveness of information technology in administering

criminal justice requires an in-depth evaluation to ascertain its contribution in mitigating crime.

Institutions, people, and systems are crucial tools for any justice system. The excellent

synchronization of these items leads to an effective system. Otherwise, it becomes a mess.

Robert (2007) stipulates the requirements of a streamlined criminal justice system, with

minimum bureaucracies. According to this author, social institutions have been McDonaldized

Criminal Justice in Criminal Justice 3

owing to the advantage this process offers when compared to earlier steps. Hence, this means

that systems have been made bureaucratic or somewhat sequential in a way. In a McDonaldized

environment, everyone is aware of his or her routine tasks ensuring a higher productivity

(Robert, 2007). With the introduction of information technology in criminal justice,

bureaucracies have made to some extent shortened the justice delivery time.

Plea bargaining is one aspect of the current justice system brought about by the

amendments to the federal laws. It is a standardized process providing what is popularly known

as industry “best practices.” When it comes to improving efficiency in the judicial system, plea

bargaining ensures that a criminal case takes the shortest time possible and more importantly

saves on costs and resources. Several benefits can be attributed to a McDonaldized system.

Quantification regarding costs, the predictability of a crime outcome and control are amongst the

well-known advantages (Robert, 2017). With information technology in place, the system is

predefined and tasks simplified.

Maureen Brown in her article, “Nature of Crime: Continuity and Change”, describes the

evolution of computers and the way they have aided in criminal justice. Thus, this entails the

accessibility of information, its storage, and subsequent usage in the process of administering

justice. There has been a gradual growth in hard technology including police tools to combat

crime, telephone usage, and investment in data centers. Massive investments have been made in

technology to aid in predictive policing technology, video recording capabilities on police

vehicles. In addition, security agencies have to assess crime in various spheres using techniques,

such as risk assessment, threat assessment in cases of terror attacks, and vulnerability

assessment. More recently, technological advancement in mitigating crime in major cities has

seen authorities spend in monitoring transactions both on the internet and phone (James &Gary,

Criminal Justice in Criminal Justice 4

2011). Through such a move, there has been a breakthrough in dealing with financial crimes

among other economic crimes. Crime mapping is also an aspect that has been enabled by the

technology when it comes to criminal justice.

Technology in aiding improve efficiency of the criminal justice system has also been

censured on several bases (James &Gary, 2011). First, the systematic handling of issues making

the system bureaucratic turns stakeholders into a machine like creatures. A routine at times is

tedious and may reduce productivity. The bureaucratic process such as plea bargaining

disadvantages several parties such as the innocent individuals who have to plead guilty to avert

the danger of a trial. Technology may be seen to have reduced the calculable costs in crime

administration but in the real sense has increased the expenditure. The primary challenge is

getting all the stakeholders in place as there is always resistance to change. Everyone has to be

on board to ensure the maximum benefits of technology in fighting crime are achieved.

Therefore, this also ensures individuals are not McDonaldized and they can produce maximally.

There is also the aspect of infringing on personal freedom where agencies deem the possibility of

a crime occurring vital than the probability. Hence, this happens where offenders are registered

and monitored as opposed to trying and controlling new ones. This, therefore, indicates that

there is the need to rethink the security systems when it comes to curbing crime. A successful

implementation of an appropriate strategy would ensure that everyone attains justice, namely

offenders, - and victims.

Involving security stakeholders in coming up with ways to control crime by use of e-

justice would be a strategy good enough to remove the bureaucracies. This approach in

conjunction with others such as closed circuit television cameras with facial recognition and

crime mapping would work as agents feel their input matters. Teamwork is productive, and

Criminal Justice in Criminal Justice 5

instead of using people as robots in the bureaucratic social institutions, their involvement in the

entire process would improve the embracing of technology in criminal justice and eventually

improve the efficiency.

Criminal Justice in Criminal Justice 6

References

Bohm, R. (2017). “McJustice”: On the McDonaldization of Criminal Justice. Retrieved 20

October 2017, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418820600552576

Byrne, J. (2008) “Editorial Introduction-The social ecology of community corrections:

Understanding the link between individual and community change”. Criminology and

Public Policy, p. 263-274.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Paper type

Deadline

Page count

550 words

Total price: $ 15.00

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Ian McGregor

UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Shannon Williams

Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."