DEATH PENALTY IS A MISGUIDED PERCEPTION 2
Death Penalty is a Misguided Perception
There is no credible evidence that exists to confirm death penalty deters crimes.
However, there is much evidence to ascertain that death penalty fails to curb crimes, thus
generating no positive impact. Sources indicate that States that have death penalty as law do not
have reduced crime rates. More so, countries that have abolished this law have not had any
significant change in the rate of crimes committed. Conversely, no research indicates that death
penalty deters the number of murders in a given area (Bedau & Cassell, 2004). Therefore, death
penalty legislation is an ill-advised perception since based on various researches conducted; it
does not curb murder and other grave crimes.
Courts of laws purport to make judgments over capital cases. The prosecution sometimes
presents insufficient evidence. Hence, there has been overwhelming misconduct by the
prosecution and the police. The defenses in the courts of law sometimes argue in an
incompetence manner due to little experience in such capital cases. Sources indicate that several
death penalty guilty verdicts successfully are appealed and overturned. Where is the sense then
that justice in capital cases through death penalties is healthy? The death penalties are unfair and
promote a broken system of providing justice to the lawbreakers (Stuntz, 2011).
The cost of the death penalty is as demanding as that of life imprisonment. Besides, the
net expense of the death penalty is a State and taxpayer’s money. However, there are other
cheaper forms of punishment. A death penalty case will require more as compared to systems
dealing with similar cases of lesser punishments. Death penalty will combine all costs of other
similar cases. These include long time before judgment, as well as pre-trial time and requirement
for more experts to deal with the case who include the defense, judges and prosecution
(American Civil Liberties Union, 2013).