Do You Believe That The Atheist Is Successful In Showing That The Existence Of Evil Is Incompatible With The Presence Of God Why Not Support Your View With Reasons

Surname 1

Professor’s name

Student’s name

Course

Date

Do you believe that the atheist is successful in showing that the existence of evil is

incompatible with the presence of God? Why (not)? Support your view with reasons

First, many proofs indicate that there is the existence of the supreme God in spite of many

other indications of disapproval. However, there are also additional alleged proofs or the so-called

proofs from the evil that affirms the non-existence of the divine God. The understanding of the

tests that depicts God's non-existence is difficult in such a way that exceeds the study of the St.

Anselm’s or St. Thomas’ proofs. In this regard, there exist groups that support and withdraw their

support about the existence of gods, namely; theism, atheism, and agnosticism. Theism holds a

strong belief about the life of God or gods and more particular of a creator who has all the

intervention across the Universe. Atheisms usually contrast with theism in the sense that, in its

most general form, it fails to agree and believe that there is the existence of at least one deity. It

constitutes the group that is known to propagate and precipitate the problem of the evil that is

unacceptable by other religions. On the other hand, agnosticism fails to believe or disbelieve in a

god or religious agnosticism. Agnostics opine that there is the impossibility of human to

understand anything concerning the Universe and how it was created and if divine existing.

Therefore, this research paper focuses on examining believe and the success of the atheist in

showing that the existence of evil is incompatible with the presence of God.

An Atheist has demonstrated notable success in showing the non-existence of the Supreme

Being, god. Atheists have taught to appreciate the fact that there is who designed the actual

designer. Even though it has been planted in the Kalam Caricature derives a form of cosmological

argument’s that comes within the first premise. The statement that whatever that has a beginning

to exist have particular causation derives a positive discussion about the atheism. It doesn’t attempt

in dealing with the theoretical aspect of God in an event where God wellbeing may be decisively

refuted and confirmed and the arena of philosophy. Atheists state that God doesn't exist and if he

lives e ho would have proved his existence? The God that has been defended by all Christian

theists is eternal, transcendent and the spiritual being. He created all the physical realities, but for

himself, he is invisible and untouchable though existed before matter space, energy, and timing.

Being exempted from the natural world, the existence of God cannot be discovered or rejected by

virtual of science alone. Hence, the form of argument that may be made either against off towards

God ought to only be puzzled by is of the philosophical. The concept of evil is anchored on the

natural depravity which is non-divine, and it is possibly held as morally accountable as a result of

its occurrence. Exploring the concept of evil ensures that several forms of evil are identified that

mentions the absence of the heavenly deity. In this aspect may be attributable to humanity and its

activities. The challenges of the fundamental belief were benevolence or the omnipotent of deities

and the existent of deities including God himself.

The concept of evil also superseded any belief that atheists held because through a

Christian perspective, it was associated with wickedness. Atheist disproved any herald that God

existed even though queries stood between them who controls the nature and the Universe. Atheist

believed that God and his spirit must be visible which in this case was no persuasive because it

was never. They found on what seen despite the sign it carried in them mainly when heralding the

presence of divine God. The concept of evil and the distinction between moral and natural evil

created a gap between an atheist and a true believer in the sense that they differed in terms of belief

and ideology. The ideology about the existence of the Supreme Being was embraced by early

Christian's believers such the Judea's and therefore alienating those from their God mean a

violation of the will in God. However, some questions would arise as to who would atheist think

or believe is in control of the Universe. Often, atheists were people who believed on scientific

orientation, and they find highly accorded to science rather than religion. Even in the contemporary

world, it is believed that many individuals who vehemently believe in atheisms are a scientist.

They tend to prove their ideology using scientific facts which in this case able to troll down the

religious events and their result is that there isn't God.

The concept of the moral evil resulted from a perpetrator and the individual who acted with

an aim violated dome basic duty or engagement with some vices. In a natural aspect, the issue of

evilness had only few victims and it was perceived as a natural process. The aspect identified evil

only for the verge or perspective of those who remained inflicted and affected and those who felt

the aspect of infliction. An example, when people are inflicted with acute and deadly diseases such

as cancer, diabetes and HIV, it mitigates their comfort and goodness rendering them to believe that

there is Supreme Being controlling the scenario. Also, when there is vagaries of nature such violent

storms and tornadoes, earthquakes, tsunami and hurricanes, acts of the supreme being, God are

evincing and therefore atheists are left to think who may be behind these phenomena. In this regard,

some of this phenomena inflicted evil on victims perhaps as a way of punishment even though no

perpetrator could be blamed. God is the only controller of such powers of nature and humanity and

the idea and believe that the atheist hold that God is absent cannot be adopted. The atheist believe

is brought forth by scientists and the disputing aspects it have towards religion on the godly

presence creates a large gap between believers and the non-believers due to difference in religious

beliefs as well in ideology.

Many philosophers have come to the concurrence of evil as a punishment as result of wrong

doing. In this respect, atheist asked whether if it would be possible for the same god who would

protect his people to inflict them with the pain of evil if he indeed loved them. The question was

raised to thwart the idea that if indeed God existed, why should he let out his people suffer in the

verge of evil. Many philosophers accentuated on that aspect of the evil and the control that the

supreme God would have in respect to saving his human kind if he was indeed present. Atheist

continued and argued that the possibility that the supreme god was indeed present and living would

be evident if nobody in the human kind suffers. If they held that if god indeed was in love with his

people and wanted to rescue them, they he would not inflict them with ‘pain of the sins and from

their wickedness. God himself have punished human because of committing sins and for that

reason, punishment was inescapable. The problematic principle that God will reach the retribution

to the generation is only understandable to religious believer. However, it would be difficult to

influence and convince an atheist and would remain appalled on how the posterity would suffer of

the sake of sins committed by their forefathers hundreds of years ago.

On the other hand, there was the theory of free will defense that was postulated by Mackie.

The great philosopher reckons that the free will defense is basically a complete failure and drop

down. Mackie continues and argues that theory does not explain evil in any case because free will

is always good and great. The philosopher is angst in his argument when he states that if God is a

wholly holy good being, how he would wish for others to have a free will which one could not

love to happen for one he/she loved. Mackie’s opines that the very first thing to carry out is to

ensure that there is clearness concerning the this problem of the evils and the reason it indicates

that the belief in God was only lacking rational support, but also allowing evil to exist in a very

strong sense. The explanation of the theory have been one of the most powerful and possible

anticipated responses forwarded during the 20

century. The ingenious argument that Mackie

makes on a free-will defense lacks the basis and therefore does not work. The reason behind is that

the reason and the impactions that the theory created was not in congruence with the fact that

Mackie wanted as to get.

In conclusion, there are many proofs that have indicated that there is the existence of the

supreme God in spite of many other disapproving indications. However, there are also additional

alleged proofs or the so-called proofs from the evil that affirms the non-existence of the divine

God. In this case, atheist has shown notable success in validating the non-existence of the Supreme

Being, God. They have also taught to appreciate the fact that there is who designed the actual

designer. Many philosophers have come to the concurrence of evil as a punishment as result of

wrong doing. In this respect, atheist asked whether if it would be possible for the same god who

would protect his people to inflict them with the pain of evil if he indeed loved them. Thus, the

research paper fulfils its purpose by examining on the believe and the success of the atheist in

showing that the existence of evil is incompatible with the presence of God.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Paper type

Deadline

Page count

550 words

Total price: $ 15.00

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Ian McGregor

UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Shannon Williams

Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

Do you believe that the atheist is successful in showing that the existence of evil is incompatible with the presence of God Why not Support your view with reasons

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

Ian McGregor

Shannon Williams