2
DRAKE MANUFACTURING COMPANY VS POLYFLOW INCORPORATED
Case
Drake Manufacturing Co. v Polyflow Inc. Superior Ct of Penn. 109A.3d 250 (2015)
Facts of the case`
The parties in the lawsuit here were Drake Manufacturing company and Polyflow
incorporated Superior. The case presented was by Drake manufacturing company following a
breach of contract terms by Polyflow incorporated. In the year 2007 drake manufacturing
company had entered into a contact with Polyflow which demanded the selling of couplings to
Polyflow. These couplings were ideal products designed by Polyflex with the primary use of
termination in polyflex thermoflex fitting. The contracts terms were that Drake ships its products
to it’s plant in Pennsylvania and then to Polyflow. Seventy-five bills from Drake manufacturing
company were recorded from august 2008 to April 2009 other bills recorded showed the
shipping of portable swinging equipment to Polyflow. At different times Polyflow would request
Drake manufacturing company to ship the equipment to farther destinations.
Issues
Issues raised by Polyflow on its appeal were that the court of law committed an abuse of
its discretion terms when it acted in favor of Drake and nevertheless acted unfairly in dismissing
the claims made by Drake manufacturing company where evidence demonstrated that Drake was
classified as a foreign business company and had no authority in operating in Pennsylvania.
The next issue presented was that the court of law had failed to verify the legitimacy of the
documents present in the motion of appeal. These documents showed that Drake was not
licensed to operate in Pennsylvania as of such Drake’s response was unverified.
