ECONOMIC CASE STUDY ON WEALTH 2
The ordinary person’s definition of word wealthy refers to people who have
abundant material possessions. Material possessions such as big houses in fancy
estates, fancy cars, expensive clothes and what not. Well, that definition is not wrong
but when a person is rich in material possession, that does not necessarily make
them wealthy. Many people who live a high lifestyle have little or no investments,
assets producing income, common stocks, bonds or their own businesses.
Conversely, the people who we say they are wealthy get much more pleasure from
owning great amounts of assets than from displaying a high-consumption lifestyle
(Thomas J. Stanley, 1996).
Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko, authors of best-selling book ‘The
Millionaire Next Door’, research revealed more about the characteristics of
millionaires than existing common knowledge on the issue. Their findings dispel the
common perceptions held on consideration of how fortunes are built up. In their book
they assert, “Wealth is not the same as income. If you make a good income each
year and spend it all, you are not getting wealthier. You are just living high. Wealth is
what you accumulate, not what you spend.” These are indeed true assertions after
the examination of the happening in society today. The people thought to be rich
because they live a very fancy lifestyle may not be what others perceive them to be
(DeMarco, 2011).
This people could be reffered to as social climbers since they may be living
that high and mighty lifestyles with their big cars but they may be a pay check away
from being bankrupt. This is because they spend all they earn from their jobs, not
thinking about the future. All they care about is their classy social status and what
they will do to gain a higher status. They could be millionaires but with poor
spending habits hence poor millionaires.