5
On the other hand, the industrialised countries agreed to provide approximately 125
billion USD through concessional terms and grants to the developing countries. Furthermore,
despite the additional funds from the industrialised countries (the North), developing countries
did not project possibility to raise their assigned bulky load of finances so as to achieve the set
international environmental protection law objectives by Agenda 21. Hence, based on what has
been presented by member states for achieving global environmental protection objectives,
international law is certainly incapable to meet the established objectives. It is mainly because
of the different policies and legal frameworks that various countries and trade blocs employ in
the operations that guarantee their development rate.
3. Combatting Infectious Diseases
Over the decades, physicians, public health officers, and scientists universally
acknowledge the advent and re-emergence of infectious diseases as among the main challenges
in public health for humanity. Combating infectious diseases on a global scale entails
development and adoption of complex objectives aimed at dealing with the matter without
implicitly affecting the socioeconomic status of the affected region, or explicitly affecting other
member states. For instance, many researchers agree that West African countries failed to curb
the outbreak of Ebola virus in Guinea, hence its spread to Sierra Leone and Liberia before being
notified to the World Health Organisation (WHO)
. Due to the ineffectiveness of the
normative and operational approaches taken by WHO to combat the virus, the UN Security
Council (UNSC) was prompted to adopt Resolution 2177 (2014) asserting “the unprecedented
extent of the Ebola outbreak in Africa constitutes a threat to international peace and security.
. Gian L. Burci, ‘Ebola, the Security Council and the Securitisation of Public Health’ (2014) 10 QIL Zoom In,
pp. 27-30; Alison Agnew, ‘A Combative Disease: e Ebola Epidemic in International Law’ (2016) 39 Boston
College International and Comparative Law Review pp. 97-128.