Effectiveness of International Law Objectives on Environmental Protection and Combatting Infectious Diseases

1
Effectiveness of International Law Objectives on Environmental Protection and
Combatting Infectious Diseases
[Student Name]
[Institutional Affiliation]
2
1. Introduction
International law describes the guidelines that regulate the deportment of nations in the
international system. The independent states in the global system establish and enforce the
principles of international law
1
. The primary sources of international law include the
customary international law, treaties, and general rules of law accepted by civilised states
2
,
since these principles stem directly from the literal conduct of nations
3
. Secondary sources of
international law entail interstate and state judicial decisions and the prose of the most
prominent publicists of the different nations
4
. The latter instances of sources are referred to as
secondary because they clarify rules established directly by states through, for example, a
custom, or treaty.
The transitory description of international law is among the major reasons why
international law is essential in dealing with global humanitarian issues such as, environmental
protection and combatting infectious diseases. Without a doubt, the world is composed of
autonomous sovereign nations that do not acknowledge a universality of higher authority. Due
to this anarchical structure, the nations have the mandate to conduct themselves based on their
own defined legal and socioeconomic frameworks. International law, therefore, is established
as a historical product resulting from the interaction of nations within a decentralised, anarchic
setting where the consent of the States spearheads it.
Hence, the concept of creating and enforcing international law presents a complex,
though, systematic way by which objectives are formulated and have to be agreed upon prior
to their enforcement. The aim of this paper is to discuss whether the contemporary international
law structure is sufficiently capable of achieving the established objectives by the international
1
David Fidler, ‘The role of international law in the control of emerging infectious diseases’ (1997) 95 Bull. Inst.
Pasteur, 57.
2
‘Statute of the International Court of Justice (1945)’ in Ian Brownlie (ed), Basic Documents in International
Law (Oxford University Press 1995) 438.
3
Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 1990) 4.
4
Fidler (n 1).
3
community. The article entails three sections, whereby the first section will discuss the
effectiveness of international law objectives about environmental protection. The second part
will assess the success of established international law objectives to combat infectious diseases,
and lastly, the paper concludes on whether the decentralised, anarchic environment is an
impeding factor towards achieving internationally set objectives.
2. Environmental Protection
International environmental protection law was started in Stockholm in 1972
5
, in which
it comprises of treaties and supplementary international legal documents. Following its advent,
the law was gradually developed in two phases, whereby the first stage involved the
establishment of a global governing body in overseeing establishment and enforcement of
environmental protection objectives, that is, the United Nations Environment Programme
(UNEP). Furthermore, the second phase involves the establishment of the environmental
protection objectives termed as the Action Plan for the Human Environment. Consequently,
the second stage involved establishing legal instruments concerned with air, water, and soil
pollution resulting from poverty and from industrial activities
6
.
The contemporary international environmental protection law objectives were
presented in The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) that
was held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992
7
. It is indicated that UNCED was considered remarkable
for the advancement of international environment protection laws in that it established the idea
of sustainable development for licit use
8
. Even though sustainable development was actually
at the central agenda of the Rio Conference, the discord between the North and South was
5
Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment, Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human
Environment, UN Doc. A/Conf. 48/14/ Rev.1 (1972).
6
Peter Malanczuk, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law (Taylor & Francis e-Library 2002) 7.
7
M.F. Strong, ‘Beyond Rio: Prospects and Portents’ (1993) 4 Colorado Journal of International Environmental
Law and Policy, pp. 21-36.
8
Philippe H. Sand, ‘UNCED and the Development of International Environmental Law’ (1992) 3 Yearbook of
International Environmental Law, 17.
4
prevalent. Emphatically, there were also conflicts within various industrialised countries, or
between the new states and the developing countries. However, the conflict between the North
and South led UNCED to develop a pattern towards more polarisation involving negotiations
and decision making techniques
9
.
The conflict between the North and the South on the Rio declaration led to a
cumbersome concession between the two sides that the implementation of the objectives laid
out were stalled for some time
10
. The rule contained in the Rio Declaration refer to common
but disparate responsibilities of nations about their various contributions to international
environmental degradation, the necessity to eliminate and reduce unsustainable trends of
consumption and production, environmental effect assessments, among other things. In
parallel, Agenda 21 comprises of a non-binding action blueprint on development and
environment. The action plan lays out sectorial concerns on the marine and fresh water,
atmosphere, and land resources, cross sectoral concerns like poverty, transfer of technology,
human health, and legal concerns
11
.
Nonetheless, by the autonomic nature and differences in production, industrialisation,
and legal instruments of the member states, Agenda 21 avoided contentious matters such as
consumption trends, the global debt of developing countries, and population growth. The most
controversial matters involved the principles on financial resources, whereby developing
countries were expected to put in an average annual cost of more than 600 billion USD towards
achieving Agenda 21. This amount does not include the UNEP Environment Fund and
environment-related protocols and conventions
12
.
9
Sand (n 8).
10
D. Kovar ‘A Short Guide to the Rio Declaration’ (1993) 4 Colorado Journal of International Environmental
Law and Policy pp. 11940.
11
N.A. Robinson (ed.), Agenda 21 & UNCED Proceedings, 1992.
12
M. Bothe, H. Hohmann, ‘Precautionary Legal Duties and Principles of Modern International Law’ (1993) 3
Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 174.
5
On the other hand, the industrialised countries agreed to provide approximately 125
billion USD through concessional terms and grants to the developing countries. Furthermore,
despite the additional funds from the industrialised countries (the North), developing countries
did not project possibility to raise their assigned bulky load of finances so as to achieve the set
international environmental protection law objectives by Agenda 21. Hence, based on what has
been presented by member states for achieving global environmental protection objectives,
international law is certainly incapable to meet the established objectives. It is mainly because
of the different policies and legal frameworks that various countries and trade blocs employ in
the operations that guarantee their development rate.
3. Combatting Infectious Diseases
Over the decades, physicians, public health officers, and scientists universally
acknowledge the advent and re-emergence of infectious diseases as among the main challenges
in public health for humanity. Combating infectious diseases on a global scale entails
development and adoption of complex objectives aimed at dealing with the matter without
implicitly affecting the socioeconomic status of the affected region, or explicitly affecting other
member states. For instance, many researchers agree that West African countries failed to curb
the outbreak of Ebola virus in Guinea, hence its spread to Sierra Leone and Liberia before being
notified to the World Health Organisation (WHO)
13
. Due to the ineffectiveness of the
normative and operational approaches taken by WHO to combat the virus, the UN Security
Council (UNSC) was prompted to adopt Resolution 2177 (2014) asserting “the unprecedented
extent of the Ebola outbreak in Africa constitutes a threat to international peace and security.
14
WHO is traditionally perceived as a global technical agent in public health. Even
though it recognises the proliferating politicisation of international health as well as the security
13
. Gian L. Burci, ‘Ebola, the Security Council and the Securitisation of Public Health’ (2014) 10 QIL Zoom In,
pp. 27-30; Alison Agnew, ‘A Combative Disease: e Ebola Epidemic in International Law’ (2016) 39 Boston
College International and Comparative Law Review pp. 97-128.
14
United Nations [2014] doc S/RES/2134; Agnew (n 13).
6
acuity around infectious diseases, the agency directs its public health objectives towards
preparedness and response capacities
15
. Therefore, the intervention of the UNSC through
Resolution 2177 (2014) recalls the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005)
16
and
emphasises the significance of WHO member nations in meeting their commitments as per the
IHR. The overall tone of the resolution was to extend political assistance and establish a further
commitment to international law objectives on combatting infectious diseases, whose actual
performance could be considered to have failed since several member states have not matched
the benchmark guidelines.
As observed in the Ebola epidemic in West Africa, Guinea's, Sierra Leone's, and
Liberia's were incapable of controlling the spread of the Ebola virus. Hence, it can be
associated with their inadequate level of compliance to attaining the objectives on combatting
infectious diseases as set out by the International Health Regulations (2005). Furthermore,
their efforts were certainly hindered by the countries’ systematically vulnerable healthcare
systems and an extreme shortage of equipment
17
.
4. Conclusion
In light of the discussions above on the effectiveness of the objectives established as
well as compliance of member states with the international law, it is a fact that international
law is incapable of achieving its aims. It is mainly due to inadequate international instruments
for addressing human security problems that result from a progressively complex,
internationalised safe environment. Hence, concerning Ebola outbreak in West Africa, as well
as effects of the differences in ideologies between member states as observed during the
adoption of Agenda 21 (1992) in Rio de Janeiro. Therefore, even though various states have
15
World Health Organization [2005], A/IHR/IGWG/2/INF.DOC./4.
16
International Health Organisation [2005] 2509 UNTS 79; David Fidler, ‘From International Sanitary
Conventions to Global Health Security: The New International Health Regulations’ [2005] 4 Chinese Journal of
International Law 325.
17
Burci (n 13) 5.
7
put their efforts in establishing international objectives towards combating infectious diseases
and environmental protection, there is the lack of a suitable global governance framework to
ensure that they are achieved by every member state. Thus, to achieve the international
objectives established, a right-based approach should be used since it conjoins rights of
individuals to the mutual responsibility of offering human security and a sustainable
environment, in turn facilitating consensus on the compliance and practice international law.
8
Bibliographies
Table of Legislation
International Health Organisation (2005) 2509 UNTS 79.
Secondary Sources
Book
Brownlie I., Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 1990).
Book in Seventh Edition
Malanczuk P, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law (7
th
edn, Taylor &
Francis e-Library 2002).
Chapter in edited Books
Robinson N (ed.), Agenda 21 & UNCED Proceedings, 1992.
‘Statute of the International Court of Justice (1945)’ in Ian Brownlie (ed), Basic Documents
in International Law (Oxford University Press 1995) 438.
Journal Article
Agnew A., ‘A Combative Disease: e Ebola Epidemic in International Law’ (2016) 39 Boston
College International and Comparative Law Review 97.
Bothe M., Hohmann H., ‘Precautionary Legal Duties and Principles of Modern International
Law’ (1993) 3 Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 174.
Burci G, ‘Ebola, the Security Council and the Securitisation of Public Health’ (2014) 10 QIL
Zoom In, 27.
Fidler D, ‘The role of international law in the control of emerging infectious diseases’ (1997)
95 Bull. Inst. Pasteur, 57.
Fidler D, ‘From International Sanitary Conventions to Global Health Security: The New
International Health Regulations’ (2005) 4 Chinese Journal of International Law 325.
9
Kovar D ‘A Short Guide to the Rio Declaration’ (1993) 4 Colorado Journal of International
Environmental Law and Policy 119.
Sand P, ‘UNCED and the Development of International Environmental Law’ (1992) 3
Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 17.
Strong M, ‘Beyond Rio: Prospects and Portents’ (1993) 4 Colorado Journal of International
Environmental Law and Policy, 21.
Reports
United Nations, Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment, Report of the United
Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Doc. A/Conf. 48/14/ Rev.1 (1972).
United Nations [2014] doc S/RES/2134.
World Health Organization [2005], A/IHR/IGWG/2/INF.DOC./4.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.