EMBEDDED REPORTERS VIETNAM VS. TODAY 3
reporting. Additionally, are subject to kidnapping by criminals, militants, guerillas, and
government forces and are either blatantly murdered or just made to depart after have been being
in the custody of the government.
However, during Vietnam War, there were no media restrictions. They were allowed to
cover a wide extent of news to their scope of disposal. The America Military permitted the
unprecedented right of entry for journalists, with no restrictions on the press. Unlike in the
current conflicts where new reporters are not allowed to outline news of a certain level; claiming
it as confidential and will be used for security services. Like in 2001 during an American war
with Iraq, news reporter were limited to access some important areas where there was massive
killing of both militia and civilians. However, open entry in the Vietnam war for the journalist's
was factors that shaped military coverage in a form which was never and will as well never be
seen or projected, with explicit reporting of human suffering. Thus lacking restrictions, reporters
from a number of media houses and outlets were sending out to Vietnam, having a number of
correspondents that surpassed 500 at the climax of the war. However, due to the nature of such
form of war, about 70 lost their lives before the clash came to an end (Grossman, 2017).
Similarly, due to high degree freedom of embedded news reporters, a number of people
in the American Government and outside the world could blame the embedded news reporters
for the U.S failure in Vietnam, having claims that, media only focused on atrocities, the combat
horrors and impact on military was a dented morale and reduced war support at home (Heine &
Herr, 2013). Unlike in the contemporary warfare like one that occurred in Iraq where allied
embedded news reporters were almost unanimously supported across the world and engineered
the war efforts.