Surname 2
The reverse perspective envisions positive correlation between environmental protection
and social equality. Communities that have strong social and political ideals enforce equal
distribution of public goods. Their food security, education, infrastructure, healthcare, and water
policies are designed to benefit all the members of the community regardless of their racial,
ethnic, or religious affiliations. As a result, natural resources are not damaged to source basic
supplies unsustainably. Further, the members of the community are aware of principles of
sustainable development. Therefore, they do not damage the environment.
Sustainability
Sustainability is a widely contested concept. Over time, the changes in the definitions of the
concept are a result of the afore-explained nexus between environmental protection and social
equality. Agyeman, Bullard, and Evans’s definition of sustainability is compelling and useful.
Their explanation describes encompasses the concepts of justice and equality in addition to other
major definitional precedents captured in the widely accepted World Conservation Strategy
definition of the concept.
In recent decades, scholars undertook studies to examine how social, economic, and
political variables influence environmental quality. According to (Agyeman, Bullard, and Evan
5), a growing body of empirical evidence from the studies reveals that social equality positively
correlates to environmental quality. In sustainability studies, the correlation is a major focus
point because it suggests that greater emphasis on social equality is may contribute to
environmental protection and preservation. A relevant definition of the term sustainability should
integrate the concepts of justice and equity. The definition that the Agyeman, Bullard, and
Evans’s analyze are not revised to integrate the aforementioned modern perspectives. That said,
the latter’s’ definition of the term is the most compelling and befitting to explain sustainability.