Ethical Dilemma

Seratt 1
Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Ethical Dilemma
Capital punishment is still a dilemma in the broken American justice system. The
question of whether it is ethical to sentence people, including juveniles, to death for their
crimes still stands unsolved. The crimes people commit across the country are similar to
those committed by the courts when they fail to duly deliver justice. Capital punishment
judgements are often flawed and unsatisfactory. The issue becomes even more complicated
when variables of race and socioeconomic status are brought into it. Because race and class
divisions are so problematic in an imperfect society, capital punishment should not be used as
a tool of the justice system. While there are many sides to this controversial issue, capital
punishment creates more problems than it solves.
Racism is one reason why capital punishment should not be administered. Most of the
time black adults and children are sentenced to life imprisonment while their white
counterparts with similar charges are given different and lighter punishments. In most cases,
it is black people who get falsely convicted of both minor and major offenses and receive
harsh sentences. Black people have even been barred from participating on a jury. This is
indicative of a broken justice system that is set up to deliver certain racial motives.
Convicting criminal suspects and subjecting them to trial is ethical. Additionally, sentencing
people on a serious legal premise and equal grounds is also ethical. But when the justice
system gives selective justice by race as opposed to the law, it becomes unethical. Society
lacks the moral authority to kill through corporal punishment because of systemic racism.
Seratt 2
The author of “Just Mercy” Bryan Stevenson noted that the justice system of the
United States favored people along socioeconomic and racial lines. It was described as being
at the crossroads of justice and mercy. According to “Just Mercy,” those who lack capital are
the ones who get capital punishment. The character of the justice system depends on how we
treat poor and disfavoured people as well as those condemned by society. Two wrongs do not
make a right, but a right after a wrong can restore normalcy, mercy, compassion and
forgiveness. In that light, capital punishments for even capital offenses are wrong. But at the
very least, a person should not be sentenced to death simply because they belong to a lower
economic class.
The ethical dilemma of capital punishment is controversial because people are
informed by many different viewpoints. People often hold the contextual belief that capital
offenses deserve death sentences or life imprisonment without parole. Such beliefs are not
worth holding because they lack substantial ethical and scientific backing. No judge would
sentence a relative, an in-law, or a partner to life imprisonment. But such judges would easily
sentence strangers to death in an eye-for-an-eye reaction. Just like Bryan Stevenson believes,
when people are far away from crime their judgment is easily impaired, and they quickly
make an unethical determination. The problem is that contextual beliefs only introduce
favoritism and bias. Because most people have a weakness when it comes to applied beliefs,
it would only be ethical to apply them in mercy and compassion toward everybody,
irrespective of race or class.
The eye-for-an-eye reaction that supports death sentences for capital offenses only
leaves the larger problems unsolved. The function of the judicial system is to ensure that the
justice sought solves the problem at hand. Sometimes it is impractical to restore normalcy.
Sentencing the culprit to death only skews the situation even further. Another death will not
bring back the original person murdered. It will not solve the underlying problem that caused
Seratt 3
the murder in the first place. It will only create more grieving families. Judicial punishment is
meant for correctional purposes. Death is not correctional and therefore will always remain
unjustified and unethical. Reactionary killing only introduces a new set of dilemmas to
society.
Views on capital punishment are informed by religious beliefs, upbringing, or relative
experience. True Christian beliefs only support love, mercy, and compassion to people and
not harsh treatment. This is true of most religions. The societal belief of justice promotes
cruel treatment to people convicted of corporal offenses. When people hold on to strong core
beliefs they sometimes ignore evidence that contradicts these beliefs. For example, minimal
attention is given to the fact that some people subjected to harsh punishments are convicted
wrongly either because of racial profiling and bias (or even through mistaken identity). Such
penalties are only indicative of grave inhumanity, or the inability to see past strongly-held
beliefs. Problems such as racial injustice, income inequality, and wrongful executions will
only be solved when enough people challenge their own set of core beliefs.
While some would disagree, capital punishment in a broken system only causes more
problems than it solves. Until racial profiling and economic prejudices are resolved in society
at large, death sentences are unethical and inhumane. Hopefully the legal system can improve
to a point that there really is justice for all.
Seratt 4
Works Cited
Stevenson, Bryan. Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption. Spiegel & Grau, 2015.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.