Experiencing emotions

Running head: EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 1
Experiencing emotions
How does the brain allow us to experience emotions?
Name:
Date:
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 2
Experiencing emotions
How does the brain allow us to experience emotions?
Introduction
Experiences of emotion in an individual emerge from psychological environments and
are also affected neurobiological processes. This paper, therefore, reviews what an individual
feels and the content which will make up the experience of emotions and how the
neurobiological processes of the brain will affect the perception of experiences. The paper will
also describe how the experience of emotions will emerge in psychological terms.
Overtime scholars have taken two main scientific approaches to emotional experience
which include traditional theories of emotion and biological naturalism. The traditional theories
of emotions are based on the assumption that experiences of emotion will be a result of physical
processes which occur in the body or brain to be specific and will, therefore, be explained from
the events which occur in the physical world. Traditional theories of emotion thus include
materialistic theories which are theories which differ much on specifics of how emotions will be
formed and how they will manifest but all share common assumptions that explanations of
emotional experiences will only need an analysis of cause and effects (Trampe, Quoidbach, and
Taquet, 2015). Another set of traditional theories of emotion is the behaviorist approaches to
emotion. These approaches thus define experiences out of what that already exists by
characterizing emotions as nothing but certain behaviors. In the behaviorist approach,
understanding emotions will, therefore, involve coming to terms with the causes of such
emotional behaviors. Identity approaches of emotion thus identify emotional experiences as
bodily states or activities of neurochemical systems or brain circuits to action plans or to a
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 3
certain extent a combination between the body and the brain (Scarantino, 2012). Traditional
theories of emotion also include functionalist approaches to emotion which will try to describe
emotion through the causal relations it has immediately. In this perspective, two experiences will
thus be of similar types if they are caused by a similar psychological situation or are defined by
similar behavioral consequences (Anderson, 2007). For example, a person may show anger if
another person is to blame which may be as a result of antagonistic behavior.
Biological naturalism is also another approach to emotional experience. Biological
naturalism is, therefore, a philosophical approach which opposes the traditional views of the
mind by offering a scientific approach to emotion experience (Hodges, 2013). In reference to
biological naturalism, adequate accounts of emotional experience will thus require more than
specifications of the causes and thus need content description which is what a person will feel
which will help distinguish a given experience from another. Biological naturalism approach to
emotional experience also posits that given content can also not be entirely reduced to what
causes it (Brooks, Shablack, Gendron, Satpute, Parrish and Lindquist, 2017). Emotional
experiences just like any other conscious states will thus be system-level properties of a brain.
This can therefore be explained through neuronal activities just as other system-level properties
such as digestion are properties of the gastrointestinal processes. Experiencing emotions can,
therefore, be explained completely through neurobiological characteristics of the brain in that
emotions can actually be inferred to the activities of the brain but emotions are not exclusively
equitable to any single feature for example biochemical properties and neural circuitry or even
synaptic changes (Harrison, Gray, Gianaros, and Critchley, 2010). This means that emotions
cannot be inferred fully to any material cause. All conscious events will thus have both
phenomenological and neurobiological features. The study of brain activity or analysis of mental
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 4
processes on their own will therefore fail to provide adequate scientific accounts of emotional
experiences. The Biological naturalism approach is also based on the concept that conscious
states will only exist only on the first-person point of view (Hoemann, Gendron and Barrett,
2017). Conscious states are thus ontologically subjective which will mean that they will naturally
exist when they will be experienced by agents which are conscious and can never be redefined
independently from those who experience them. It would thus be impossible to measure more
easily observable emotional aspects such as vocal acoustics, facial movements and voluntary
behaviors so as to deduce subjective aspects of emotion. To really understand emotion it would
thus be necessary to ask subjects what they experience. Through biological naturalism, scientists
should thus concentrate on subjective experiences so as to understand the emotional experience.
Focusing on the material underpinnings of experiences may thus not reveal full information. To
describe the process of how the brain allows us to experience emotions it is therefore important
to understand how the experiences of emotions will emerge from more basic processes using a
psychological framework.
The Phenomenological Contents of Emotion Experience
Core Effect
At its core, every mental representation of emotion will thus be a state of pleasure or
displeasure which can be generally termed as core affect. The states of pleasure or displeasure
associated with emotions are thus termed as core affect because such experiences will be present
at birth, the ability to experience pleasure or displeasure will be present in all human beings, and
that all measures of emotion which are instrument based will show evidence of a given persons
unpleasant or pleasant state or its intensity, for example, vocal acoustics or expressive behavior
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 5
and peripheral nervous systems activation (Kagan, 2018). States of displeasure or pleasure are
also termed as core affect because they constitute neuropsychological barometers of how an
individual will relate to their environments at a given point of their lives and will also form the
core consciousness of individuals (Franks, 2016). There is therefore much empirical evidence
which shows that mental representations of emotions will either have displeasure or pleasure at
their foundation. Different people will thus give different explicit accounts of unpleasant or
pleasant feelings using different levels of self-rating scales (Scarantino, 2012). Various scales
which are meant to measure discrete emotions including anger, fear, and sadness also show
evidence of common foundations of unpleasant and pleasant feelings. However, despite its
importance core affect cannot be the sufficient measure of mental representation of emotion in
itself. All experiences of emotions are thus intentional states in that they are affective states that
relate to something (LeDoux and Brown, 2017). All descriptions of emotion experiences must
thus go beyond displeasure or pleasure so as to be able to provide systematic accounts the
phenomenological differences between all the emotions which we may take as psychologically
distinct which may include sadness, anger, fear, pride, fear, joy and awe .
Arousal Content
In some instances, mental representations of emotions will be made up of arousal -based
content. This can include the feelings of the body or mind being active such as being attentive as
opposed to feeling that the body or mind is lazy or still state (Hoemann, Gendron and Barrett,
2017). Felt activation may therefore not possess a one on one correspondence to actual
physiologic activity. However, despite the much value derived from describing the mental
presentations of emotions appraisal, descriptions alone may not be sufficient to give accounts of
what a person may feel when they are experiencing emotions .
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 6
The Neural Reference spaces for the experience of Emotions.
In the present days, though it would not be plausible to reduce emotional experiences as a
result of neurobiological processes and provide explanations of how neural activity may insatiate
specific emotional contents, it will be possible to provide preliminary sketches of brain areas
which will be involved during the experience of emotions. These will generally include the
temporal lobe which includes the amygdala, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the
orbitofrontal cortex (Rorty, 2014). These areas will, therefore, form the functional circuit which
is distributed in the ventral section of the brain which will help in determination of the reward
value or threat of different stimulus. The reward or threat value of different stimulus is therefore
determined when sensory information of given stimuli is linked with the representations of how
such stimuli will affect a given person’s somatovisceral state (Hoemann, Gendron and Barrett,
2017). Nueroanatomical studies amongst both humans and primates along with lesion evidence
and neuroimaging thus show that a ventral system will create context-sensitive neural
representations of a given objects value by having an influence on a person’s core affective state
such that such states will be similar to that which resulted from previous experiences with a
similar stimuli (Tyng, Amin, Saad, and Malik, 2017). Available evidence thus indicates that
neural representation of the sensory information related to a given stimulus and the
somatovisceral impact it might have will thus be entailed in functional circuits which are related
and which comprise the ventral system for the core affects. The first functional circuit will thus
be made up of the basolateral complex- amygdala connection which will code the original
information relating to a given stimulus, the experience or content dependent representations of a
given objects value, the lateral and central aspects of the OFC and the anterior insula will be
involved in the representation of interoceptive cues (Scarantino, 2012). Both the orbitofrontal
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 7
cortex (OFC) and the basolateral (BL) complex have strong reciprocal connections and robust
connections with numerous cortical representations of all sensory modalities in a way that they
have formed a functional circuit which will integrate all sensory information. This information
will thus be needed so as to establish value-based representations which will include the impact
of an object on the homeostatic state of the body and the external sensory features of an object
(Hodges, 2013). According to Scarantino (2012), the basolateral complex will formulate the
predicative value of a given stimulus while the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) will participate in the
generation of responses which will be based on that prediction.
The second functional circuit which is made up of neural representation that will act as
guide to viscreromotor control will involve reciprocal connections which are found between
ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC), and the amygdala and the subgenual anterior cingulate
cortex (ACC) which will work together to modulate the visceromotor which are the behavioral,
autonomic and chemical responses which will form portions of value-based representations of
given objects (Barrett, Lewis, and Haviland-Jones, 2016). Ventromedial prefrontal cortex may
thus help connect different sensory representations of given stimuli with the visceromotor
outcomes that are associated with them and subsequently provide an affective working memory
whose contents will determine the judgments and choices after the assessment of an affective
value has been made.
Understanding Emotional Experience a Psychological Framework
Neurobiological evidence which includes neuroimaging, neuro-anatomical and
neuropsychological and also content-based analyses of emotional experience shows that mental
representation of emotions can to a certain degree be described in terms of pleasure or
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 8
displeasure which will be experienced together with other mental concepts which may originate
from mental state attributes (Gasque, 2016). For example, one may experience psychological
situations in ways which are causally linked to affective feelings. Such findings will thus be
consistent with psychological treatments of emotional experience which are based on the
hypothesis that psychological processes will be the foundations of mental representations
through which emotions will emerge from (Kragel, Knodt, Hariri and LaBar 2016). The main
idea is therefore that the mental representation of emotions in any occasion will thus be
continuous streams of changing consciousness during which the core affect will evolve
continuously, mutually constrain and interact with construals of the given psychological
situation.
At all times the brain will thus be involved in integrating and processing different parts
of sensory information from around the world, prior knowledge about different situations and
objects which allows the brain to produce affective states which will be bound to certain
situational meanings, disposition to act in given ways and somatovisceral information from the
body (Lindquist, Wager, Bliss-Moreau, Kober, and Barrett, 2012). As a result of how the brain
perceives and integrates and is predisposed to act in certain way psychological situations and the
construal’s and core affective feelings which are related to them are thus likely to be categorized
within the perception as single unified percepts such as depth, color, and shape are experienced
together when an object is being perceived. Through this view mental representations of
emotions will thus be examples what can be referred to as ‘the remembered present (Lindquist, et
al., 2012). In the brains continuously varying landscape, different patterns may appear which
will in some instances set the conditions for emotional experiences. Following the conditions
described emotional experiences can thus be described as conceptual structures which will be
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 9
stored in the memory of a given person and whose conditions might include cognitions, current
perceptions, core affect and actions (Deng, Chang, Yang, Huo, and Zhou, 2016). Specific
emotional conceptualizations, for example, a given context-specific conceptualization of anger
will thus be generated from a top-down simulation which will help reinstate how such conditions
were experienced in the past, such conceptual representation will then interact with the present
affect-situations and eventually result to the emergence of certain emotional experiences. This
will, therefore, lead to already situated conceptualizations of emotions which include the
previous knowledge about the given emotions which are borrowed from past experiences to
constrain new and emerging perceptual categorizations (Deng, et al, 2016). In resultant
representation, core affect is thus bound to how an individual will perceive a given situation
which will make affect into what can be referred to as an intentional state as attribution will be
allowed during the cause of the formation of affect.
People will thus have affective information of how they relate to the world either through
neural representations of previous instances when given objects produced a resultant homeostatic
change, through sensory levels or through homeostatic feedback from the body (Garfinkel,
Eccles, and Critchley, 2015). For example, when one is in a meeting and their proposal is
rejected and one experiences unpleasant feelings one can be able to explain what the percept is
for example by stating they are angry. An individual can also be able to evaluate the reasonable
inferences for their unpleasant feelings. For example, an individual can argue that they are angry
because their goal was jeopardized. Individuals can also be able to make the decision on how to
best act on their feelings, for example, to keep themselves measured and controlled in official
settings or scowl in unofficial settings (Hinton, Miyamoto, and Della-Chiesa, 2008).
Categorization of different perceptions will thus make it easier for individuals to make a
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 10
distinction between different feelings of anger and differentiate such feelings from other feelings
for example confusion or fear. Affective information will thus be delivered as a core affective
state which will be responsible for feelings of displeasure or pleasure which will be linked to
primary appraisals or ongoing automatic evaluations of the world as opposed to specific
interoceptive readouts of autonomic activities (Kragel, Knodt, Hariri and LaBar 2016). The way
an individual will conceptualize their affective state is dependent on prior knowledge they have
regarding a given emotion which they will use when categorizing it. For example, an individual
may experience their core affective states as particular sorts of nervousness, anger, and sadness
which will be dependent on the given conceptual knowledge and awareness that the individual
has or will bring to bear in such situations (Gasque, 2016). Experiencing emotions can thus be
described as a state of mind whose content may be pleasant or unpleasant and thus affective and
conceptual which will form the basic representation of an individual’s relation to the world
around them. This view is thus consistent is thus consistent with numerous theoretical insights in
the present relating to neurobiology and consciousness.
Six Basic Emotions
Anger
The amygdala part of the limbic system is responsible for anger and when triggered, it
releases a flood of hormones which cause an energy surge. As such, a person experiences a
hormonal surge which makes the brain proactive (Gasque, 2016). Consequently, the hormones
transfer the aforementioned energy onto the muscles, resulting in a physiological buildup of
tension that drives a person “nuts”. Notably, a longer lasting hormone is also released and
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 11
maintains its presence for more than the initial twenty minutes that is synonymous with the
earlier angry outburst.
Sadness
Sadness induced by physical pain has a varying effect on the brain in comparison to that
effected by emotional distress. As such, the latter increases activity within the arrangements of
the limbic system, especially the ones situated close to the face. Similarly, there are much more
enhanced movements in the left prefrontal cortex than the right owing to the higher number of
hormonal emissions in that locale. However, the hippocampus region provides a higher
concentration of this activity (Kagan, 2018).
Fear
The human brain contains an amygdalae that acts as a storage area for the things one
should be afraid of and upon any trigger, it is activated. Therefore, these nerve cells collect
information from external stimuli and communicates it with the hypothalamus region situated at
the front part of the brain (Hodges, 2013). Notably, the fear signal travels faster than its visuals
and is centered on the crisis system and the amygdala. Consequently, the communications are
transmitted to the memory center which automatically detect the threat and release hormones as a
form of stress response.
Surprise
The “surprise” emotion is activated by the sensory neurons located within the amygdala.
As such, the neurons detect both the “good” and “bad” surprises, transmit them through the
anatomical circuitry to their valence-specific cells where they induce a release of aversive or
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 12
reward hormones. Importantly, these nerves conduct a search upon which the brain compares the
information found with that located within the memory center. Thereafter, a switch occurs
whereby the brain becomes cognizant of “new” material. Therefore, one experiences an
alternating intensity of emotions based on the nature and carrier of the surprise (Hinton,
Miyamoto & Della-Chiesa, 2008). Normally, a person freezes for approximately 1/25
th of a
second, a period in which the brain processes such information with the intention of eliciting a
response.
Happiness
The cerebral cortex sends happiness signals/sensations from the ventral tegmental area
(VTA) that facilitates the transfer of pleasurable emotions throughout the brain. Consequently,
the VTA hijacks the nucleus accumbens and floods it with dopamine, a neurotransmitter
hormone which is closely linked with pleasure (Franks, 2016). As such, the prefrontal cortex is
activated. Thereafter, the brain shifts the individual’s attention to the reward stimuli that
conditions him/her to repeat the task. For example, human beings derive pleasure from eating
and upon the release of more dopamine, one if bound to continue with this activity.
Disgust
The “disgust” emotion is centrally activated in the insula part of the brain, especially the
anterior area where visceral signals/sensations are controlled (Tyng, Amin, Saad & Malik, 2017).
Therefore, it receives visual information from the frontal section of the face and the ventral
superior cortex that handles all the major sight mechanisms associated with a person. Similarly,
the posterior insula which consists of the premotor, somatosensory and auditory parts is actively
involved in this process. Consequently, a neural hormone of disgust is released upon one sighting
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 13
an unpleasant scene, leading to an electric transmission to the memory center which validates
such an occurrence.
Conclusion
In summary, emotions will, therefore, be physiological feeling states and adaptive mental
states which will guide our behavior and effectively direct our attention. Emotional states will
thus be accompanied experiences of the bodily responses which are referred to as arousal which
will be sympathetic divisions of the autonomic nervous systems. The basic emotions will thus
include emotions such as disgust, anger, happiness, fear, surprise, and sadness. Individuals will
also be able to experience secondary emotions as a result of cognitive appraisal. Different
aspects of emotional experience will thus affect how given emotions will be linked to the
wellbeing of a given individual these include the intensity of emotions experienced, the context
in which given emotion will be experienced and how the emotions experienced will fluctuate
over time.
References
Anderson, A. K (2007). Feeling Emotional: the Amygdala links Emotional Perception and
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 14
Experience, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Volume 2, Issue 2, 1, Pp.71
72.
Brooks, J.A. Shablack, H Gendron, M Satpute, A.J Parrish, M, H Lindquist, K.A (2017).The
Role of Language in the Experience and Perception of Emotion: a Neuroimaging Meta-
analysis, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Vol. 12, Iss.2, 1.Pp. 169183.
Barrett, L. F., Lewis, M., & Haviland-Jones, J. M. (2016). Handbook of Emotions. New York
[etc.: Guilford Press.
Deng Y, Chang L, Yang M, Huo M, Zhou R (2016) Gender Differences in Emotional Response:
Inconsistency between Experience and Expressivity. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0158666.
Franks, D.D. (2016). The Neuroscience of Emotions. Virginia Common Wealth University.
Garfinkel SN, Eccles JA, Critchley HD. The Heart, the Brain, and the Regulation of Emotion.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(11):10711072.
Gasque, G (2016) Seven Glimpses into the Emotional Brain. PLoS Biol 14(12): e2001633.
Harrison N.A, Gray, M.A Gianaros, P.J, and Critchley, H, D. (2010).The Embodiment of
Emotional Feelings in the Brain. Journal of Neuroscience. 30 (38) 12878-12884.
Hinton, C Miyamoto, K and Della-Chiesa, B. (2008).Brain Research, Learning, and Emotions:
implications for education research, policy, and practice. European Journal of Education,
Vol. 43, No. 1.
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 15
Hodges, J (2013).Making Sense of Biological Naturalism. University of Hertfordshire.
Hoemann, K., Gendron, M., & Barrett, L. F. (2017). Mixed emotions in the predictive brain.
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 51-57.
Kagan, J. (2018). Brain and Emotion. Emotion Review, 10(1), 7986.
Kragel PA, Knodt AR, Hariri AR, LaBar KS (2016) Decoding Spontaneous Emotional States in
the Human Brain. PLoS Biol 14(9): e2000106.
LeDoux, J.E and Brown, R. (2017). A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (10) E2016-E2025.
Lindquist, K., Wager, T., Bliss-Moreau, E., Kober, H., & Barrett, L. (2012). What are emotions
and how are they created in the brain? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(3), 172-202.
Rorty, A. (2014). Explaining Emotions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sarah N. Garfinkel, Emma Zorab, Nakulan Navaratnam, Miriam Engels, Núria Mallorquí-Bagué,
Ludovico Minati, Nicholas G. Dowell, Jos F. Brosschot, Julian F. Thayer, Hugo D.
Critchley; Anger in Brain and Body: the Neural and Physiological Perturbation of
Decision-Making by Emotion, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Volume 11,
Issue 1, 1 January 2016, Pages 150158,
Scarantino, A. (2012). How to Define Emotions Scientifically. Emotion Review, 4(4), 358368.
EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS 16
Trampe, D., Quoidbach, J., & Taquet, M. (2015). Emotions in Everyday Life. PloS one, 10(12),
e0145450.
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The Influences of Emotion on
Learning and Memory. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1454.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.