Fantasy-Theme Criticism 3
constraints, which relate to their distrust to the rhetor, inability to recognize the exigence, and the
display of poor oratory skills by the rhetor among others.
In Nixon’s case, his duty involved
generating a strong response that addressed the situational exigence, audience, and constraints,
which he achieved. To deliver the criterion of this achievement, this paper justifies the relevance
of the "Checkers" speech for rhetorical analysis, discusses the fantasy theme methodology of
coverage, analyze the contextual and historical backgrounds of the artifacts, criticize the artifact,
and evaluate the discourse of the rhetor.
Justification for the Fantasy-Theme Criticism of the "Checkers Speech"
Understanding the general background and source from which a piece of artifact or
rhetorical text emerged provides the valid ground for subjecting it to an analysis as a rhetorical
text. In the background off this text in the year 1952, the candidate for Deputy Presidency of the
United States of America faced accusations for the plundering of at least $18,235b that had been
donated to his campaign kitty by Californian businessmen. As reviewed by the existing
committee of the Republican National Committee, this situation posed a threat and possibly
embarrassing situation for the then presidential candidate, General Dwight Eisenhower. If the
“Checkers Speech had not been made, the highest probabilities were that the Presidential
Candidate General Dwight Eisenhower would have had to drop his deputy presidential candidate
for another one. This would have made situations unpredictable for both the “preferred deputy
president” and the “running mate” as presidential candidate. While the preferred deputy
president would have lost support and position, it is also clear that all his “lovers” were not sure
to vote for the presidential candidate after his departure.