Strategizing, Structuring, and Learning Around the World 3
people as well as resources by use of two factors; function and product (Peng, 2006). This formation
results in a complex network vertical relationship i.e. boss and subordinate coordination reporting
perfect rapport.
Matrix structure has a lot of advantages including efficient use of resources. Also, the matrix
structure presents a communication between members from various departments can lead to a
participative decision-making process. In addition, the structure presents high motivation levels
because of members' participation on matters pertaining to decision making. However, it has its
disadvantages too, for instance, conflicts and power struggles can arise especially in cases where an
overlap occurs between authority and obligation. Competition for scarce resources can sometimes
contribute to conflicts. Much emphasis consensus can delay decision making. Further, reporting to the
two bosses can cause ambiguity and workflow conflicts ("Bayer MaterialScience buys composite
materials specialist", 2015).
Question 3
Definitely, it’s difficult for such an international or multination to speculate or figure out the
motivations of a CEO on a subsidiary organization. In the case above, it was definitely a gamble taken by
NMS when they acknowledged Babe’s proposal. Possibly, it could have cost them about $70million if
Babe had failed to deliver on their promise. On the other side, Babe’s team came up with a nice
innovative proposal with an aim of increasing productivity out of self-interest. BMS had an intention to
dismantle BMS NA (Peng, 2006). They could have translated into massive layoffs. But this is what
prompted Babe to find a solution to this problem.
In addition, its probably difficult for any multinational to distinguish between good rapport or
good faith with opportunity maneuvers. However, the only way out is to put into test the proposals and