Hitlers leadership

Running head: HITLER’S LEADERSHIP 1
Hitler’s Leadership
Student Name
Institution Affiliation
Date
Course
HITLER’S LEADERSHIP 2
Hitler’s Leadership
The assessment of popularity in 1933 to 1945 could be considered difficult due to
Germany's government style through that period. The main reasons for this may be the
suppression of freedom of speech in Germany, due to the censorship the state imposed on the
media and individuals in the Regime. Other reasons for the unreliability on evaluating
popularity may be the restriction of information; it is known that propaganda was one of the
main methods of releasing information to the public. The state would withhold information to
the people of Germany and allowed the state to manipulate them through the media easily.
Overall, the main factors that contributed to Hitler's popularity were the policies implemented
by his regime, the use of terror and violence in Germany, resistance towards the state by the
people and opposition groups. The main historians used for this assessment will be Fulbrook,
who mainly supports the argument that Hitler was unpopularity and Rees, with Johnson and
Reuband who supports popularity.
Fulbrook’s interpretation of whether Hitler was popular or not is very determent, but
overall, she suggests that he was unpopular during this period. She strongly implies that the
effects of the Regime led to internal migration which was the cause by the fear the state
projected through terror, the evidence that shows this is the migration of intelligent
individuals who moved from Germany to other countries such as USA and UK, who
benefitted from this brain drain. As well as the act of burning books with contradicted with
the ideals of the Reich, which included communists, Jews, and Socialists. There is also the
suggestion that there was direct unpopularity through the creation of opposition groups which
were created due to discontent and attempted to resist it, however, though they were against
the state, violence and terror performed its role and made these people scared to go against
the state. Groups that were created were ‘Edelweiss Pirates,' ‘Leipzig Meuten,' ‘the Dresden
Mobs' and ‘Bismarck Gang,' which were formed by working-class families. This evidence,
HITLER’S LEADERSHIP 3
overall, would emphasize that unpopularity towards Hitler came from the poorer society
within Germany, due to the changes being more unfavorable towards them, a strong example
would be; Autonomous trade unions were abolished and giving no voice to the working class
and how the employer was given more power over them. On the other hand, it’s also
indicated in Fulbrook’s work that Hitler did have popularity from higher classes in society,
especially from the industrialists, as they were able to regain control over worker wages, but
popularity did also stem from Hitler’s foreign policy which had positive reactions from most
social classes.
Rees’ interpretation of Hitler's popularity shares similarities with Fulbrook’s ideas,
however, his interpretation suggests that he was popular. This is evident as Rees’ state “the
Gestapo received enormous help from ordinary Germans. Like all modern policing systems,
the Gestapo was only as good or bad as the cooperation it received and the files reveal that
it received a high level of cooperation, making it an excellent secret police force files show
that most of this unpaid cooperation came from people who were not members of the Nazi
party. There was never a duty to denounce or inform.", Other evidence showing public
cooperation is “a 56-year-old woman who lived in the same house sent an indictment to the
Gestapo. Her main complaint was that she objected the widow having a relationship with a
Jew, although it was not then an offense.”, This showed that there was cooperation.
Popularity is also shown as Rees states in his work “You denounce them; you hear somebody
tell a joke about Hitler you denounce them as well.
Denunciations could also be used for personal gain; you want the flat the old Jewish
lady lives in you denounce her; your neighbors irritate you-you denounce them too.” The
actions of Germans towards the Gestapo showed popularity as they would usually gain their
information from the German people who willingly denounced those considered enemies of
the state or to when it served their interest. Hitler also did have policies that received
HITLER’S LEADERSHIP 4
popularity from Germans such as the reduction of unemployment by creating jobs through
the autobahn and its shown in the Rees’ work that most citizens in Germany noticed living
standards had greatly improved. Most Germans noticed the change and supported these
policies mostly because they liked them. The statistics for unemployment were 6 million in
1932 which then dropped to 2.4 million in 1934, thus showing the policies were effective in
reducing unemployment. Hitler’s successful policies were a factor which increased his
popularity; this was mainly because Germans during the Weimar Republic struggled
economically due to inflation and the increase in jobs and reduction in homelessness, overall
led to Germans having a positive look towards the Regime and Hitler.
In comparison to Fulbrook, Rees gives an impression that terror and violence
committed by the Gestapo/Regime was a factor as to why Hitler was an unpopular leader.
However in Rees' work he also agrees that terror and violence was used in the regime by the
Gestapo, especially through harsh torture tactics and the role concentration camps played, but
he also states that these methods were only used on a small fraction of people in the Regime,
specifically political opposition and Jews, thus meaning a large majority of Germans were not
attacked by the State and may have been a reason for open support towards the Gestapo.
Another similarity that can be made between Fulbrook and Rees is that the policies brought
forward were popular with the German people due to there being economic stability and more
jobs to supply to people through the autobahn, however, there were different opinions
towards these policies, especially the economic policies, as working class citizens showed
passive resistance towards the regime, though it was ineffective in accomplishing much, it
was a sign of unpopularity.
HITLER’S LEADERSHIP 5
Johnson and Reuband support Rees in proving Hitler’s popularity in Germany. His
work covers many factors towards Hitler’s popularity. Policies implemented by the state was
a factor that had led to public support, evidence that supports this include: “60% of Germans
from Cologne, Krefeld, Dresden and Berlin liked the fight against unemployment”,
“Reduction of crime was also popular towards Germans, Cologne 57%, Krefeld 59%,
Dresden 42%, Berlin 56%”. This quantitative data is essential in determining whether there
was a majority in support towards Hitler, the data was also recorded after the Third Reich,
meaning it is reliable due to no Nazi influence. This data suggests that there was high support
towards the policies, probably because it was successful in getting people into work, as well
as, society is much safer than before, during the Weimar Republic.
Similarly, to Rees, popularity is also shown through the support the Gestapo gained
from the citizens. Johnson and Reuband’s work states “when the respondents were asked how
the Gestapo or police had found out about the alleged illegal activity, around 49% in cologne
and Krefeld identified informants in their immediate surroundings primarily neighbours
followed by colleagues and finally relatives and family members as the cause”, this would
suggest that the state had an appropriate amount of support, and those denunciations came
from a wide range of people, thus giving the impression that Germans would have to live a
‘second life' where they can freely express themselves, which could be seen as passive
resistance.
There is other evidence of popularity in Johnson and Reuband’s work such as “He
helped low-income families with lots of children, Families with lots of children got
preferential coupons for foodstuffs, for clothing. They could buy them for less" and
“Conditions were better. Order ruled the streets. Women were also able to go through towns
without anything happening like it would today”, This would imply that Hitler's popularity
stemmed from his effective policies, such as the improvements in the economy, as the state
HITLER’S LEADERSHIP 6
were able to subsidize food, thus improving the living standard for those in the State. His
popularity also came from making the state safer, during the Weimar Republic period there
were many militias which would constantly fight and in comparison, to the Third Reich,
many Germans would agree that the regime was better. Johnson and Reuband’s work further
show popularity as their work also says “Only a minority of Germans, it appears, fully
believed in National Socialism, admired Hitler, and were strongly committed to most Nazi
ideals, though most Germans certainly found at least some things that were to their liking
about National socialism and very few were against this'." This implies that Germans weren’t
fully committed to the Regime as other people such as members of the SS, but shows that
they also didn’t mind the way things were being run due to them also being benefitted from
the State, hence why there weren't any huge opposition groups to take on the Regime.
However, there is strong evidence to show unpopularity, within the Regime, as stated
in work, "Germans were proud that Germany had once again become an autonomous state
under Hitler. Considering this, even many critics of the regime were unable to conceal their
respect”, this shows that there were actively against the state and suggests that there was
passive resistance. The opposition is also shown, as its stated that “the SA rapidly opened
concentration camps all over Germany in schools, hotels, and even youth hostels. Among
those held in concentration camps were groups such as the communists”, this emphasized that
opposition groups were targeted by the Regime as well as “around 100,000 people were
arrested and temporarily jailed even those who made snide remarks about the tat and its
representative’s risked arrest and punishment." This shows that whoever criticized the state
was punished and served as an example to those who wished to rebel. Overall, Popularity
towards Hitler was due to his effective policies such as the improvement in the economy.
Popularity also came from his policies that also rebuilt German industries, which
created jobs and kept people satisfied as things became more affordable and Germany was
HITLER’S LEADERSHIP 7
domestically safer, in comparison to its previous state under the Weimar Republic. Johnson
and Reuband share similarities with Fulbrooks works, especially in some aspects such as
terror and violence being an instrument in ensuring German compliance to the Nazi system,
however, Johnson and Reuband state that during interrogations, people were allowed to visit,
thus showing the Regime wanted information on the conditions of prisoners to spread so that
it may deter others from following. In conclusion, Hitler’s popularity seemed to be positive,
due to his effective policies which had a positive impact towards most of society.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.