Is The Death Penalty Effective |

Is the death penalty effective

Is the Death Penalty Effective?
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Is the Death Penalty Effective?
Many people do not like making a decision on the topic of the effectiveness of death
penalty as a method of deterring crime because of conflicting interests. It is evident that most
states provide death penalty as a gross punishment to those convicted of capital offenses such as
murder and treason. Such countries execute death penalty through hanging, electrocution,
shooting, and lethal injections. In the recent past, many nations have put up a fight against these
judicial executions. In my opinion, the death penalty is not an effective method of deterring
crime because of three reasons. Therefore, states should adopt other crime deterrent measures in
place of the death penalty.
First, death penalty denies an individual a chance to reform. People regularly make
mistakes when performing their daily chores. Therefore, they deserve a chance to correct their
mistakes. Executing a death penalty on an individual is a wrong choice; rather, giving another
chance for reform is always right. Apparently, the convicts of capital crimes end up reforming
and becoming useful community members. If imprisoned for a term, they may end up gaining
some valuable vocational skills that they can utilize to improve their living standards once they
are set free. Moreover, the states should consider taking the convicts of capital crimes under a
psychological counseling plan because it helps to build their mental awareness and correct their
mistakes (Zelden, 2007). Everyone deserves a second chance because none is perfect. Therefore,
the death penalty is an ineffective deterrent to crime because it denies people the chance to
Secondly, the death penalty is an abuse of the right to life and freedom to live free from
torture. According to Brayer (2016), the state should not deny its citizens the right to life under
any circumstance. Life is sacred. Spiritually, nobody is obliged to kill others. The constitution in
most countries grants citizens the right to life. Executing a death penalty upon citizens is against
the constitution and a disgrace to their creator and giver of life who is supreme. In short, it is a
state-sponsored murder because in most cases it claims innocent lives and goes against a culture
that values life. Therefore, the death penalty is not an effective method of deterring crime
because it goes against the constitutional provision of the right to life and freedom from torture.
Lastly, the death penalty does not always deter another similar crime from occurring.
How many treasons and murder cases have been committed even after executing death penalties
on such criminals? Well, this serves as clear evidence that this is not a constructive and long-
term solution to such crimes. It is violence to an individual. In essence, states should adopt better
ways of eradicating crimes in place of the death penalty. In most states, there is no noticeable
change in crime rate even when there are frequent executions and their subsequent publications.
Death penalty only satisfies the urge for revenge because it does not last forever. A study by
American Criminology Society shows that death penalty does not prevent murderers from
conducting their acts (ABC NEWS, 2015). Therefore, the death penalty remains an ineffective
way to reduce crime because it does not prevent the occurrence of a similar offense in future.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that death penalty is an inefficacious method of deterring
crime because it denies individuals chance to reform, violates the constitutional right to life, and
fails to curb occurrences of similar crimes in future. States should adopt other long-term
measures to curb crime. In that effect, they should remove the death penalty clause from the
ABC NEWS. (2015, May 04). Fact check: No proof the death penalty prevents crime. Retrieved
March 25, 2017, from
Breyer, S. (2016). Against the Death Penalty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Zelden, C. L. (2007). The Judicial Branch of Federal Government: People, Process, and
Politics. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.