IS THE DEATH PENALTY EFFECTIVE? 2
Is the Death Penalty Effective?
Many people do not like making a decision on the topic of the effectiveness of death
penalty as a method of deterring crime because of conflicting interests. It is evident that most
states provide death penalty as a gross punishment to those convicted of capital offenses such as
murder and treason. Such countries execute death penalty through hanging, electrocution,
shooting, and lethal injections. In the recent past, many nations have put up a fight against these
judicial executions. In my opinion, the death penalty is not an effective method of deterring
crime because of three reasons. Therefore, states should adopt other crime deterrent measures in
place of the death penalty.
First, death penalty denies an individual a chance to reform. People regularly make
mistakes when performing their daily chores. Therefore, they deserve a chance to correct their
mistakes. Executing a death penalty on an individual is a wrong choice; rather, giving another
chance for reform is always right. Apparently, the convicts of capital crimes end up reforming
and becoming useful community members. If imprisoned for a term, they may end up gaining
some valuable vocational skills that they can utilize to improve their living standards once they
are set free. Moreover, the states should consider taking the convicts of capital crimes under a
psychological counseling plan because it helps to build their mental awareness and correct their
mistakes (Zelden, 2007). Everyone deserves a second chance because none is perfect. Therefore,
the death penalty is an ineffective deterrent to crime because it denies people the chance to
reform.
Secondly, the death penalty is an abuse of the right to life and freedom to live free from
torture. According to Brayer (2016), the state should not deny its citizens the right to life under
any circumstance. Life is sacred. Spiritually, nobody is obliged to kill others. The constitution in