Surname 3
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (Collier 154). The irony in
the entire scenario is that one of the fundamental principles of the OECD is the pursuance of
democracy and good practices. It is one thing to condone corruption but yet another thing
entirely to pass laws that literally encourage corruption and use taxpayer’s money to compensate
companies that indulge in corruption (Milliet-Einbinder 39).
Banking and Laundering loots
The second form of corruption encouragement and support is the laundering and banking
of monies clearly obtained through illegal means. When a government employee in a Bottom
Billion Nation approaches a bank seeking to deposit 1Billion US dollars, a banker will clearly
tell that the money has been illegally procured. There are two approaches the banker would take
the high road, refuse and report the crime or decide to maximize the profits by getting premium
rates on the understanding that the money has been laundered. Unfortunately, it is the latter path
that the developed nations have for many years chosen to follow. From Sani Abacha to Iddi
Amin, bankers in the develop world have raked in billions of US dollars doing business with the
plunderers of the Bottom Billion.
Creation of Substantive Laws
The existence of tax rebates for bribes may have already been eliminated but there is
need for substantive prohibitory and punitive laws that stop commercial interest groups from
developed countries from aiding and abetting corruption on the Bottom Billion nations. The
Great Britain is on the forefront of this endeavor with tough measures including giving actual jail
times to executives of countries found to be abetting corruption. A good example regards
Nicholas Smith and Christopher Smith, executives at the Smith and Ouzman Company who were
held criminally liable for a Kenyan scandal dubbed Chicken Gate that involved corruption in a