LEADERSHIP, ETHICS AND FOLLOWERSHIP 3
The two contrast in definition; leadership is the ability to direct individuals in a group or
institution while ethics means the drive to distinguish between what is right and wrong. The
success of a leader is not directly dependent of the ethical principles. Worthiness of a leader is
measured only in terms of character (Ciulla, 1998). On the other hand, ethics, at individual level,
are defined by actions and results from those actions.
Leadership and Followership
Studies show that “transformational and charismatic leaders” promote optimism and
positivity in promotion focus by employees, which constitute to positive results (Kark & Dijk,
2007, p.516). Followers’ rights and roles in an organization describe the leaders' responsibilities.
Ciulla (1998) argues, “Followers’ rights require that leaders recognize their true role within the
commonwealth” (p. 33). Therefore, leaders’ decisions are highly based on the needs of their
followers. Additionally, leadership can be termed as services to others. This means that leaders
aim at satisfying the needs of their followers who are an important part of the leadership
phenomenon (Ciulla, 1998). A great leader listens to his or her followers; accept suggestions and
offer opinions and solutions. The relation between leaders and followers define the possibilities
of success in any task. Leaders should focus on motivating their followers substantially for them
to perform considerably. Communication should also be strengthened for access to relevant
information contributing to timely and accurate decisions.
In contrast, a leader aims at motivating and provide for the needs of his or her followers,
while followers aim at increasing their own satisfaction at the expense of their responsibilities.
Leaders may portray high level of business ethics and motivational skills but performance rates
fail to hike. This may be due to uncooperative followers.