Surname 1
Professor’s name
Student’s name
Course
Date
Logical Fallales
There are various forms of the logical fallacies that accentuates an errors in the process of
listening and not necessarily in the veracious aspect of premises. Often, logical fallacies aren’t
opinions nor factual error or mistake (Richard, 11). They are basically attempts to assist in
bypassing the phases of logical argumentation for the purpose of winning it. In a logical fallacy,
the argument contain two parts, that is; a premise (or premises) and a conclusion. Usually, the
premises support for that conclusion while conclusions drawn is a claim being made. Logical
reasoning can be categorized into two major types; that is the deductive and the inductive
reasoning (Richard, 19). Deductive reasoning affirms that if premises are certified, then the
conclusion must be also true. However, an inductive argument affirms that when premises are
certain, then they offer a certain supportive degree for the conclusion; the more the support, the
better the argument becomes. Induction have to go from a particular cases to generalizations
(Richard, 23).
In this case, I will dwell on a Non Sequitur that affirms a technical sensitivity for all logical
fallacies as variations of non sequitur, Latin for "does not follow." In this form of logic fallacy, the
conclusions do not necessarily follow the premises in a chronological order. An examples of logic
fallacy.
Thousands and thousands of Americans have got a chance to see lights in the night sky
which they could not identify. This proves the existence of life on other planets!
