Surname 4
reporting according to IFRS standards since it does not give an accurate and fair view of the total
cost of producing a commodity.
Full absorption costing is an alternative method of inventory valuation that takes all costs
associated with the production process and the redistributing or apportioning them to each final
product (Blocher et al., 2010). The costs allocated include, direct labor costs used in production
work, direct materials that went to the production, fixed overhead costs such as rent and variable
overhead expenses such as electricity. In this method, values are assigned to predetermined
constant cost pools and then the usage calculated per unit of production. The usage gets divided
with the total production costs to arrive at a total cost of production for each group.
This method is recommended in financial reporting since it takes into consideration the
overhead manufacturing costs, unlike variable costing. The only setback is that some expenses
get assigned to products that did not utilize them while others are over under absorbed. Over
absorption occurs when the costs assigned are higher than the real prices used in the production
while under absorption will happen when a product gets fewer production costs allocated than
the reality. The result is that a considerable amount of production costs are untraceable to the
product (Taschner and Charifzadeh, 2016). Since overhead costs are an ommision to expenses, it
is possible for a company to realize higher profits by simply producing more than the market
requires.
Activity - Based Costing is another method of inventory valuation. In this method,
overhead costs are into consideration just like in absorption costs. However, it is more accurate
since the first step is assigning values to only those activities that are the real cause of the
overheads. It then leads to assigning the costs of these activities only to those products that need
these costs in their production process (DRURY, 2013). Hence, it is possible to trace the exact