Market Structures

Running head: MARKET STRUCTURES 1
Market Structures
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Market Structures
MARKET STRUCTURES 2
Market Structures case study from the Island of Tap
Introduction
People from the Island of Tap are exposed to two market structures namely, monopoly and
perfect competition. Several factors contribute to the occurrence of the named market structures.
The shift from the market structure known as perfect competition to that of monopoly has
happened for the inhabitants of the Island (Tap). Antagonism between the sellers of corn in the
Island was initially fierce and this made the price of corn to be antagonistic and low. After the
company (Mega Company) brought together all corn farmers in the Island into a single facility,
the price of the product started to rise. This was because a single organization started to sell the
produce and by this, there was no rivalry (Weller, Kleer & Piller, 2015). In this regard, Mega
Company had the freedom to set the price of the commodity at whichever it desired.
When the farmers could sell their self-produced corn, the market structure of tap Island
was that of perfect competition. Weller, Kleer & Piller (2015) argue that in a market structure
which is perfect competition, there is lack of exit as well as entry barriers and this makes it easy
for anybody to enter the market. Obviously, the market for corn is usually homogeneous.
Regardless of the person who sells corn, it is more likely to be similar. Therefore, in the case study
provided that demonstrates perfect competition, the cost of corn was tremendous because there
was a lot of competition among the farmers. Moreover, the farmers lacked the privilege of setting
prices for their products (corn). The farmers did not benefit in this type of competition (perfect
competition).
MARKET STRUCTURES 3
On the other hand, the advantages and benefits of the perfect competition were felt by the
consumers in the Island of Tap. This is because a consumer in the Island of Tap did not get amused
with the product and also the price of one seller, he or she had a chance of going to another seller
elsewhere and buying the commodity. However, when Mega Company that was the Island's local
beef manufacturer began to purchase all the corn from the farmers and started to package it in a
single facility, the market turned to become a type of monopoly. The main problem with this type
of market is that the company (in this case Mega Company) becomes the sole price maker. Even
if the unvarying quality of corn overjoys the people of Tap Island, there is lack of competition. It
is evident that the company set the value of corn to be higher as opposed to the time when the
product was sold in a market structure known as competitive that was evident when each farmer
sold his or her produce directly. Also because the company in our case is purchasing all produce
of corn in the Island of Tap, there are no opportunities for other companies or a single company to
enter the market (McKenzie & Lee, 2016). Therefore, the actual winner in this type of market
structure is obviously Mega Company because it will make profits now that there are no close
substitutes.
In case the people of this Island (Tap) want the price of corn to go down, they should refuse
the corn, and this would compel the organization (in our case mega-company) to reduces its price.
A big problem of a monopoly structure of the market is that it always sells commodities that a
person must have and are needed by an individual (Auer & Schoenle, 2016). That is the reason it
is a monopoly already. In fact, corn is good and necessary. It is needed for whichever delicious
thing. In fact in Brazil corn is essential in fuel making. Farmers in the Island of Tap are overjoyed
that they do not see the essence of going to the markets and sell their produced corn, but I am sure
MARKET STRUCTURES 4
the farmers are not getting huge returns by selling the product to the monopoly company.
Nevertheless, the monopoly cannot be bad to the people of Tap Island since they can be willing to
pay higher for the uniform quality as well as the packaging, but truly, the people do not have a
choice.
A good example of a monopoly is the gas company. We stay in a particular place, and we
are compelled to purchase from the company. In case we fail to pay the price that they set, it
implies that we will not get access to warm water. In this regard, we lack a choice. On the other
hand, a good example of the perfect competition structure entails of the farmers in the marketplace.
An individual can make it to any farmers market or grocery store and different prices as well as
qualities. The small Island of Tap initially began with a market structure that was price competition
but later on it shifted to become a monopoly.
Conclusion
Lastly, if we get to compare the previous situation with the current one, there will be several
changes. Look at the previous situation, the number of sellers is big, and they sell their produce
individually. In light of this we can say there are many buyers and sellers. This is market structure
known as a monopolistic market, and low prices characterize it. On the hand, when Mega Company
entered the corn market, it became the buyer for all the produced corn and changed the bought
corn into its brand name and began to sell the corn as a sole seller. In this regard, the situation in
the market has shifted since for final consumers of the produce (corn) there is a single seller, and
the large numbers of consumers still exist. This means the market has now shifted into a monopoly
market that is characterized by the ability of the seller to set prices. This is what made the price of
corn to increase in the Island of Tap.
MARKET STRUCTURES 5
References
Weller, C., Kleer, R., & Piller, F. T. (2015). Economic implications of 3D printing: Market
structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited. International Journal of
Production Economics, 164, 43-56.
McKenzie, R. B., & Lee, D. R. (2016). Microeconomics for MBAs: The economic way of
thinking for managers. Cambridge University Press.
Auer, R. A., & Schoenle, R. S. (2016). Market structure and exchange rate pass-through. Journal
of International Economics, 98, 60-77.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.