Morality of the Death Penalty

Running head: MORALITY OF THE DEATH PENALTY 1
Morality of the Death Penalty
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
MORALITY OF THE DEATH PENALTY 2
Morality of the Death Penalty
In the contemporary world, perceptions of the moral stance of the death penalty are
profoundly diverse. Considering that morality differentiates right and wrong, it has been
challenging to conclude whether the punishment of offenders through the death penalty is
justified or not. However, after a close examination of its application and impacts, while
referring to the deductions of normative ethical relativism and moral realism, it is correct
deducing that the death penalty is morally permissible.
Morality means that one has to distinguish between right and wrong acts. Some crimes
are heinous in the sense that they affect masses adversely or claim people’s lives. A perfect
example is terrorist acts. When the death penalty applies to the crimes of high magnitude, it
serves the offenders right since they appear to be an unwanted and dangerous part of society. As
a result, it correctly acts as the best retribution process which is equal to the crime that the
offender commits. Despite some arguments that it violates the right to life, it is morally wrong to
think that people who do not respect others’ lives deserve it in any way. Overall, it promotes
fairness.
Death penalty promotes deterrence and reform. Regarding deterrence, the method
protects the innocent from harm. Doing so gives the procedure its forward-looking purpose and
shows that the punishment approach is not there to punish but to deter offenders from engaging
in heinous acts. Since morality is concerned primarily with the rightness of an action, it is right
to use a correctional approach that guarantees the safety of the majority. As the offenders see
what happens to others, they reform and continue promoting a better community morally.
MORALITY OF THE DEATH PENALTY 3
Different ethical approaches can also apply to this case and justify the moral position of
the penalty. One of the leading theories is normative ethical relativism. According to MacKinnon
and Fiala (2016), this theory follows the premise that no valid moral principles apply universally.
The entire issue depends on the context and how society uses laws. From the theory’s point of
view, moral uprightness of actions varies across communities. Therefore, the variation in its
perception from one state to another is normal. Situations will be changing since different
cultures apply different values and principles to define morality. As a result, the death penalty is
moral provided that it benefits the majority despite overlooking the right to life.
Moral realism can also apply to the justification of the moral nature of the death penalty.
Moral realism asserts that some moral values and facts are highly objective and independent of
how people perceive issues (MacKinnon & Fiala, 2016). That said, the moral judgment of a
concept involves the application of the moral facts which mostly cannot provide a universally
accepted definition of an idea for it to be right or wrong. It is for this reason that makes capital
punishment morally justified due to its appropriate usefulness.
To a significant extent, views of the death penalty will remain divisive. Since there is no
universal view of what is right or wrong, its support will depend on how a state applies its
fundamental values and principles. So far, it is right to use the death penalty for deterrence and
enhancing reform.
MORALITY OF THE DEATH PENALTY 4
References
MacKinnon, B., & Fiala, A. (2016). Ethics: Theory and contemporary issues. Cengage Learning.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.