Nurse paper 3 revision

Running Head: CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 1
Course
Name
School
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 2
Change Policy Proposal
Part A
A1. Public Policy Issue
Jacksonville is an area whose occupants have varying levels of income and hence,
some families with low income may not qualify for the Obama Care reformation also known as
the Affordable Care Act. However, people belonging to a low economic class have the right to
accessing primary care at a lower cost or even free of charge. It is important to note that lack of
insurance cover and low income are two main factors that decreases control of personal health
care as well as increases morbidity in low income earners. My proposal is centered at
development of free clinic to offer healthcare services to individuals with no or low income.
A1a Issue Selection
Based on the America health care policy, everyone has a right to access healthcare
services (Jones & Kantarjian 2015). The right to access health care is supported by the fact that
even the emergency departments may not fail to provide the needed healthcare services to
patients regardless of their economic status. However, individuals with low income and also
who do not have health insurance coverage may not receive the medical services for a long
period. For instance, an individual with an emergency case of high blood pressure may receive
some emergency medical attention but the services may not be extended to prevent future
occurrences of high blood pressure. The proposal of free clinics is to help patients with low
income who may not afford the Obama Care because it is only favorable to fewer individuals.
Having such clinics in place is important because they support increased patient well-being as
well as reducing morbidity and hospital admissions.
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 3
A1b. Issue Relevance
It is argued that there is at least a 35% decrease in uncompensated health care. With the
introduction of Obama Care, a significant number of people are able to access health care
services as compared to the situation before the introduction of the policy (Obama, 2016). It is
important to note that the Obama Care reformation does not include everyone on board as
individuals with no insurance still face some challenges in accessing health care services. There
is a still a big gap in meeting the health care dynamics amongst Americans.
In another study, it is argued that failure to withstand the Obama Care reformation has resulted to
individuals with low income to struggle in meeting the health care bills. It is argued that the
introduction of the new policy has discouraged some individuals from accessing continual health
care services and illness management (Kaiser, 2018). As a result, a significant number of
individuals from low economic status have been forced to depend on emergency departments as
a way to access primary care even for long term diseases.
A1c. Financial Impact
The proposed change will have a substantial financial impact. It is important to note that
provision of healthcare services is an expensive project that requires a large amount of capital.
Consequently, providing and maintaining management of long-term ailments is likely to
substantially impact the financial reserves for both the federal and state governments. The
financial impact can be perceived from three different angles. Firstly, finances are required to
set up centers and clinics for free health care services. Secondly, the clinics will also need to
have adequate medication to be offered for free to a high number of patients who do not have
medical insurance. Thirdly, more finances are also required for the salaries for the health care
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 4
providers, janitors and every staff working in these free clinics. In summary, the financial impact
will be as a result of funds to cater for medications, health care providers, staff, medications and
medical supplies.
A2. Personal Values
From my personal observation, some people live in poverty because of two main reasons.
One reason is that some individuals have made the personal decision of not being employed and
hence end up lacking the funds to cater for medical care or a job to provide health care insurance
for them. Another reason for increased poverty for some individuals is because of mental and
physical illnesses that causes some kind of disability which in turn prevents them from being
able to earn income that may facilitate access to health care services. In my opinion, the
proposal for free clinic can be actualized through the pursuant of community and religious
obligatory role of helping individuals. It is the role of religious groups and community to help
individuals with low income to access health care services. Even though it appears to be
unrealistic, having the right people on board would facilitate easier achievement of free clinics as
religion plays an important role in decision making in the lives of many.
A2a. Ethical Principle or Theory
My suggestion for free clinic is guided by the ethical principle of taking care of others or
beneficence. Having free clinics will help individuals to have autonomy over basic needs,
medications and health. It is of importance because it leads to helping individuals to regain
dignity, despite suffering from different forms of illness. It is also important to realize that
helping the individual from a lower economic class to access health care will cultivate a sense of
inclusivity where the low income earners and individuals without income are treated equally like
members of society, instead of looking down on them and writing them off as low-lives. Even
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 5
more, it is an approach that help the health care providers to have a positive impact on the
society by offering help.
Part B
B1. Decision Maker
The decision maker who needs to receive the briefing policy is Lenny Curry, the Mayor
of Jacksonville.
B1a. Explanation
It is important to seek the decision maker’s attention concerning the policy change. The
decision maker, the mayor of Jacksonville plays an important role in influencing the
implementation of different policies including the health care policy. The role of the decision
maker is critical for the implementation of the free clinics which will help to meet the emerging
needs of patients. There is an increasing number of individuals who do not have funds to access
health care services following the introduction of The Affordable Care Act. It is estimated that
approximately 31 million individuals in the United States do not have medical insurance. Hence,
making it difficult to access the health care services (VIM, 2014). This group of individuals
without healthcare insurance comprises of undocumented immigrants and other Americans with
low income who cannot afford to pay for any time of plans for medical insurance. According to
Andrews (2016), some individuals who are suffering from long term illness causes a higher
deduction for their medical insurance which may be as high as $1000. Consequently, even
though some individuals may be working, the high deductions towards medical insurance may
prevent them from seeking medical help not including the out-of-pocket deductions.
Importantly, the other reason that calls for seeking the decision maker’s attention is due
to the gap in the health care policy. It is important to note that large sums of funds are being used
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 6
to meet the needs of hospitals providing care to individuals with health care insurance with little
consideration to the individuals with low incomes and without medical insurance cover.
Involving the decision maker will help to create a balance in between treatment for insured and
uninsured patients. For instance, we can save more funds used in hospitals. This can be achieved
by having less specialized care providers attend to patients with minor healthcare needs. This
strategy can help shift some funds towards helping in the implementation of the free clinics. The
decision maker’s influence is also essential in ensuring improved access to primary care and
decreased spending in healthcare services (Salmond & Echevarria, 2017).
B2. Challenges
The proposal to have free clinics is an important idea that will facilitate access to
healthcare facilities for individuals without medical insurance coverage. However, starting and
implementing the free clinics initiative is likely to face three major challenges.
First, there are higher chances of financial challenges. It is important to note that the
establishment of free clinics is a new policy with no previous plans. It requires high initial capital
to start and also to maintain. The large sum of money may be a challenge because it is likely to
be facilitated by donors and other philanthropic individuals in the society. Even though the
government may offer support, it is an expensive initiative because some medical needs such as
long term illness may need more money which the patients may not manage to provide in the
long run.
The initiative to make the free clinics a reality is also faced with the challenge of finding
the best place to locate the clinic. It is important to note that the individuals without medical
insurance and individuals living with in poverty are scattered in different regions. To meet the
needs of various individuals would require establishing the clinics in different regions to ensure
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 7
equity in meeting the needs of individuals from different regions. Importantly, the challenge of
finding the best location also contributes to financial constraint.
Another critical challenge in implementing the free clinic is scarcity of resources. The
project requires various resources including health care providers, free medication, health care
supplies and tools such as blood pressure machines, EKG machines, Tele monitors, etc. that are
needed to diagnose and treat patients. All these resources need large sums of money, which may
result to taking longer time before the plan can be implemented. It is also important to note that
the United States health department faces a major challenge, which is the shortage of health care
providers, a factor that may further influence the implementation of free clinics. The clinics will
also need medical equipment such as imaging machines and lab equipment among others to
facilitate fully functioning of the clinic to meet the needs of different patients.
B3. Options/Interventions
The mayor may implement three decisions that will affect health care access to low
income individuals and patients without health care coverage. First, the mayor could make the
decision to allow patients without medical insurance to access healthcare services through the
emergency department. It is the easiest way through which the patients not covered by Obama
Care can access health care facilities. It is a quicker way for the low-income individuals to
receive quick treatment that can help to facilitate their health care and prevent death. However,
this is not the most effective option, and is recommended to be followed only when it is
impossible to implement the free clinics. The option is considered inappropriate in providing
sufficient care services because patients will not benefit from long-term care that they need
because the emergency department only provides care to alleviate the symptoms for a short
period.
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 8
Another option for the decision maker is to consider taking only the affordable parts of
the proposed policy. Having realized the financial challenges associated with the project
implementation, the decision maker can ensure effectiveness by partly implementing the services
that ensures the individuals within the low-income bracket get reliable healthcare facilities. For
instance, instead of having a permanent location for the free clinics, the mayor may support
implementation of the free clinics that are mobile. This strategy will help reduce the cost of
implementing the project by reducing the number of physical clinic location. Importantly,
having a mobile clinic will help the care providers to reach a larger number of patients needing
the specialized care services. Even more, it will reduce the number of care providers required
hence, a reduction in the overall cost of implementing the free clinics.
Finally, the decision maker can also choose an option of improving the proposed
decision. Improving the proposed solution may be the best plan because it will involve
integrating the existing policy with the new policy. For instance, the mayor may influence the
inclusion of the proposed free clinic services into the existing hospitals. This may include
inclusion of the policy that facilitates access to health care by the uninsured and low-income
earners in the Affordable Care Act.
B4. Course of Action
The mayor will have a different course of action to overcome the problems. First, the
challenge of financial constraints in meeting the needs of implementing the free clinic can be
pursued by seeking financial help through government grants. The financial aid from the
government is the best option for this case because the government can provide substantial
amount that can help the in implementing the policy change through establishment of free
clinics. Secondly, the challenge of shelter and location of the free clinics can be solved by the
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 9
decision maker locating low cost business locations where the clinics can be set up for reduced
fees. Even more, the decision maker can overcome the challenge of insufficient resources by
seeking aid from already existing hospitals and religious organizations in the community. For
instance, the mayor may seek donations of equipment, beds, and computers from hospitals
around. The mayor could also have staff members who work at local hospitals volunteer in the
free clinic and provide training from established hospitals on how to offer health care services to
low income individuals. It is also necessary for the decision maker to involve the State
Epidemiologist in educating the public and the target supporters about the importance of the free
clinics. It is an effective way that may help the target supporters to understand the urgency of
having the free clinics.
B5. Success of Policy
The evaluation of policy success will show the extent to which the proposed policy has
succeeded. The success of the proposed policy will be evaluated based on the approval of free
clinics to operate throughout the region. The approval will show the success of the mayor in
winning the support from religious organizations, businesses and established hospitals helping in
actualizing the proposed policy change. The evaluation of can also be achieved by observing the
trend in the number of patients admitted in the emergency rooms. It is important to note that an
advantage of the free clinic is to reducing the number of emergency visits by providing adequate
access to uninsured and low-income patients.
Part C
C1. Identified Organization or Community
The proposed organization to form collaboration with is UF Health of Jacksonville in
Florida.
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 10
C1a. Summary of Expressed Interest
UF Health of Jacksonville was established in 2002 and it serves the purpose of assessing
the health care needs of community members. The aim of the organization is to bridge the gap
for patients without healthcare insurance to have access to healthcare facilities and treatment.
The organization’s purpose correlates with the proposed health care policy and the organization
collaborates with other organizations to facilitate healthcare to individuals with limited access to
healthcare.
C2. CBPR Principles
The first CBPR principle is that the free clinic is for a community. The principle
corresponds with the acknowledgement that communities are distinct and different communities
have different needs. This principle supports the fact that different patients have different needs
and it has a moral obligation to cater for the needs of all patients (Applying Principles of
Community-Based Participatory Research to Your Program, 2011). The second principle is
building on strengths and resources within the community. Establishing free clinics is a best
strategy to for utilizing the resources within the community for improving the lives of
community members. For instance, it creates a chance of utilizing the unused resources owned
by local hospitals and business organizations. The third CBPR principle is promoting co-
learning and building capacity among different partners (Applying Principles of Community-
Based Participatory Research to Your Program, 2011). The proposed policy change is critical
because it needs the collaboration between different stakeholders.
C2a. Approach and Collaboration
I can organize for collaboration by requesting a meeting with the UF Health CEO to
present my proposal. The UF Health has one clinic in operation and hence my proposed policy
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 11
change will facilitate providing healthcare services to more individuals especially those living in
poverty and lack health care insurance. Even more, collaboration can be enhanced with further
meetings with the director of UF Health to find out possible ways of having staff volunteer and
donating equipment to make services available to the people in need. Importantly, the
collaboration can also be improved by discussing the objectives of the proposed policy to
establish the best way to form effective collaboration.
C2b. Goal Alignment
The goal of my proposed policy is to help individuals who have challenges accessing the
Affordable Care Act to have access to health care without insurance being a limiting factor. The
UF Health has a similar goal because it focuses on facilitating access to health care facilities and
services for individuals without health care insurance. For instance, the hospital provides
patients with a card known as Shand’s card that facilitates free stays in hospitals during
admissions and free medications that are provided by UF Health (Financial Assistance, n.d).
Therefore, it is evident that the organizations goal and mode of operations aligns well with the
proposed policy change.
C2c. Action Steps
Achieving the goal of helping the uninsured access healthcare facilities requires strategic
approaches. Firstly, it will be necessary to invite the UF Health management to join hands in
requesting support from religious organizations and businesses to advocate toward channeling
their support in providing health care access to the uninsured and the poor. Secondly, I would
seek funds and aid from volunteers and donors who can help by donating funds and turning the
proposal into a reality. In addition, I would consider gathering resources from local businesses
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 12
and the local hospitals that can help in providing health care services, donating medical supplies
and equipment.
C2d. Roles/Responsibilities
The function of the proposed free clinics will be impacted by the roles of different
individuals and groups in the community. The role of project proposer is to coordinate other
members of the team and organize meetings that will facilitate the implementation of the
proposed policy. The project proposer will also serve the purpose of being the meeting
facilitator. It is essential because it contributes to the coordination of the meeting and discussion
of agendas leading to successful policy change. The UF Health leadership will serve in
managing the staff of the free clinics as well as offer help in procuring equipment to help
facilitate the operation of the clinics. Another important group is the owner of local businesses
who will play the role of remodeling the location facilities including buildings and other
infrastructures to ensure successful launch of the free clinics. Even more, the management of
local universities such as Jacksonville University can take part in contributing towards change of
policy through permitting the nursing students and medical doctors to be part of the policy
change. For instance, the nursing students would help in educating community members about
the benefits of free clinics to the public.
C2e. Key Elements of Evaluation Plan
The evaluation plan for the proposed policy change can be evaluated by considering the
previously mentioned CBPR principles. The proposed policy will be evaluated based on the
CBPR principle of acknowledging the community by checking the extent to which services are
offered to individuals of different race without exclusions. The evaluation plan will also include
the principle of building on strengths and resources of the community. For instance, the extent
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 13
of which the policy changes utilizes the religious organizations, transport programs, and food
programs within the community to enhance the delivery of services to patients. The principle of
promoting co-learning and capacity building among partners is also essential because it
contributes in development of evaluation programs that can assess the skills of workers that is
necessary in meeting the service delivery requirement.
C2f. Community/Organization Plan
The success of the organization plan could be evaluated based on the responses from the
individuals expected to offer support in actualizing the policy change. For instance, a higher
number of individuals showing up to support the proposed policy change will be an indication of
a successful plan. Even more, support from local businesses and the already established local
hospitals is an indication of acceptance from the surrounding community. The success will also
be indicated by various factors including the number of supporters attending the organized
meeting to support the policy change idea. Even more, the presense of the needed support from
the local businesses and hospitals will also indicate the acceptance level of various groups. For
instance, getting the needed financial support from the government and other donors will indicate
the will and of such organizations to see the proposed policy in operation.
Part D
D1. Strengths of Each
The top-down method makes the organization have support and approval of financial
income from the government before the proposal made public to the community. It is essential
because it helps to offset burdening the public by offering some support. On the other hand, the
bottom-up approach puts pressure on government officials and other organizations to support the
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 14
proposal. It is an approach that makes the community members to feel as part of the proposed
change.
D2. Challenges of Each Approach
A significant challenge of top-down approach is the difficulty in getting the approval of
the government leadership to support the policy change. The proposed project needs large
amounts of money and the mayor maybe reluctant to approval because of uncertainty of the
support from the community. The problem with bottom-up approach is that the community may
feel disappointed if the project does not succeed. Even more, the bottom-up approach does not
guarantee the community support in pushing for approval from government leadership.
D3. Most Effective Approach
The most appropriate approach is top-down. The approach is suitable because it will
involve the government officials identifying the advantages and shortcomings of the proposed
policy before the actual implementation of the change. Even more, the approach would facilitate
collaborators such as UF Health leadership to influence the community members to volunteer
and make donations to help in actualizing the policy change.
CHANGE POLICY PROPOSAL 15
References
Andrews, M. (2016, April 19). For The Insured But Cash-Strapped, Free Health Clinics Still
Have A Place. Retrieved from National Public Radio:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/04/19/474731301/for-the-cash-strapped-
insured-free-health-clinics-still-have-a-place
Applying Principles of Community-Based Participatory Research to Your Program. (2011,
October 1). Retrieved from Health Outreach Partners: https://outreach-
partners.org/2011/10/01/applying-principles-of-community-based-participatory-research-
to-your-program/
Financial Assistance. (n.d.). Retrieved from UF Health: https://ufhealth.org/financial-assistance
Kaiser, H. J. (2018, October 3). 2018 Employer Health Benefits Survey. Retrieved from Kiser
Family Foundation: https://www.kff.org/report-section/2018-employer-health-benefits-
survey-section-1-cost-of-health-insurance/
Obama, B. (2016). United States health care reform: progress to date and next steps. Jama,
316(5), 525-532.
Salmond, S. W., & Echevarria, M. (2017). Healthcare transformation and changing roles for
nursing. Orthopedic nursing, 36(1), 12.
VIM. (2014, April 2). The Need for Free Clinics Under the Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from
Volunteers in Medicine: http://volunteersinmedicine.org/free-clinics-affordable-care-act/

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.