Surname 4
that Gladwell presents is the randomness of the success opportunity determinants. Such
determinants have been termed outliers by Gladwell, however, I think that each passing
movement, one’s choice, and the power to pursue the choice is the ultimate determinant of one’s
destiny. To me, those who fail to get the opportunities make the true outliers.
The interesting it of the book by Gladwell lies in the way he uses his examples to justifies his
arguments. While he agrees that ability is vital, he insists on how paramount opportunity is for ne
to succeed. Gladwell seem to see unfairness in everything including education. He fails to realize
that the 10,000 hours of performing time is in itself self-sacrifice and determination and not
opportunity as he insists. When he uses one’s family background to justify their success, he
misses to acknowledge that family background represents a group success but not an individual
success. I think outliers are external forces which ought to be accidents but not to be the sole
excuse or justification for success and failure. Also, I fail to understand how talented people get
to success, with some not even having to get through the Gladwell’s already criticized education
system, or without wealthy family backgrounds.
The book by Gladwell gives hope to those who feel that life has been unfair to them. On the
contrary, I think that self-determination cannot be under dispute at all for as long as success is
involved. Even those with high intelligence quotient and talents do not automatically become
successful; luck plays a very key role for many even to people like Bill Gates. There many
people in society that have become successful based on luck as they did not even expect it come.
As much as the book is fascinating about the things that influences a person’s success, I find it
limited with information in the sense that the author did not explore other successful groups of
individuals in the society that have not been exposed to the same kind of advantages.