HISTORY OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN AUSTRALIA 4
The Catalysts for Reforms on the VET System
There are numerous factors that necessitate the need for a Government to adopt and make
changes to the VET system. Ballenden (2001) identified one of these factors as the need to have
a qualified and skilled workforce that will catalyse the economic development of a nation.
Vocational competencies and skills of the workforce have been found to be key ingredients to
the performance of a country's economy (Brown, 1999; O'Toole, 2010). Through an effective
vocational training, new and productive talents are developed. These talents are critical in a
country’s industrial development. Ballenden (2001, p. 39) noted, "The skills Australia needs for
economic and social success are often generic and transferable and currently undervalued in the
formal education and training system." Therefore, there is a need for countries to show
commitment through strategies to value and develop workforce skills because they equip
employees to work in a knowledge economy.
Another important factor that spearheads the adoption and changes in a national unified
VET system includes the challenges resulting from globalisation. Globalisation has seen critical
changes in the world of work and the economy evident through outsourcing, downsising,
structural changes, and rapid technological changes (Ballenden, 2001). Indeed, Brown (1999)
consented to that point by alluding to the fact that the onset of the knowledge economy due to
globalisation has had a profound effect on operations of work worldwide. The change in
technology is occurring at a rapid pace. Ballenden (2001, p.) observed, “An hour’s work is, on
average, twenty-five times more productive now at the beginning of the 20
th
century. Some of
the resources that were considered critical in wealth generation in the past, included labour, land,
and physical materials. However, in the recent past, knowledge, creativity, and ideas have been
regarded as the key resources required for wealth generation. From Robinson’s (2000) view, it is