Privacy Censorship and Collection Development

Privacy Censorship and Collection Development
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Privacy, Censorship and Collection Development
Ideally, collection development involves the process of identification, selection,
acquisition as well evaluation of library resources for a group of users. While it is the purpose of
collection development to meet the needs and wants of its users, this is not entirely achieved due
to constraints such as censorship. Censorship which can be alluded to as the suppression,
restriction or prohibition of library materials that are considered obscene or even morally
unacceptable, has been a controversial topic for libraries for over a long time as it remains a hot
topic even in the present times. This paper extensively focuses on the challenges that censorship
displays on library collection development as well service delivery. Librarians through their
professional association have effortlessly being committed to the social justice of intellectual
freedom, however; censorship has continually threatened this principle of intellectual freedom.
This paper also raises concerns about how current librarians can ethically, effectively and
consciously censor library collection development without violating the principle of intellectual
freedom. The choice of the essential resources depends on scholarly peer-reviewed journal
articles. The consideration criteria for articles are the time it was published, the origin of writers
and their retrieval point. These resources will give unique commitments and discussions
regarding the matter of privacy, censorship and collection development when it comes to
intellectual freedom.
Citation 1:
Candi Pierce Garry, (2015). Selection or Censorship? School Librarians and LGBT Resources,
Hamilton High School, USA, Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
Candi focuses on exploring the field of LGBTQ identities a topic that he contends to have
been ignored for the longest time. On the onset of the article, the author talks about how students
including those identified as members of the LGBTQ group can profit from quality library
materials that reflect on their encounters. The author denotes that books with such contents are
important books that need to be included in a library’s collection since they help students, or
rather the users of the library to identify and to come into terms with their sexuality. This article
also inspects on whether public library experts’ self-censor their library materials when it comes
to materials with LGBTQ subjects. Further, the author utilized both subjective and non-
subjective approaches to quantify his exploration work where his findings concluded that school
libraries tend to have significantly fewer LGBTQ themed materials than titles with materials
with different sorts of disputable contents.
The author of this article uncovers fascinating as well useful knowledge concerning how
librarians are held in the dilemma of either choosing to incorporate or exclude LGBTQ materials
in school libraries and the purpose of their choice.
This publication is useful to my paper since it gives perspective privacy and censored
LGBTQ materials should be developed within our library collections and how it saves lives that
are by supporting an environment of acceptance and tolerance.
Citation 2:
Falk-Rose Fran & Caplan Jeanetta, (2008), The Challenge of Censorship, Forum Commentary,
Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
This article gives a detailed foundation on the importance of intellectual freedom when it
comes to teaching as well in the learning of students. It points out currently students are exposed
to a wide variety of reading materials, and as a result, there is the need to protect students from
the materials they access. Nevertheless, the author contends that taking away someone’s
intellectual freedom is censorship and which according to the ALA its alluded to as the
prohibition of ideas and information that a specific group of individuals/organization finds it to
be objectionable/dangerous. Conveniently, the author vocalizes that regardless of the intentions
behind censorship, it is essential that the intellectual freedom if protected and cherished at the
same time.
The author of this article effortlessly uncovers the challenges that are related to
censorship arguing out that despite what the intentions of censorship could be it is important that
intellectual freedom is observed.
This article is useful to my paper since it explores on the difficulties that arise as a result
of content censorship and which can be related to how censored LGBTQ materials can be
developed within our library collections.
Citation 3:
Fialkof Francine, (2004), Selection Not Censorship, Earlham Library; Library Journal,
Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
Ideally, the author of this publication reflects on the responsibilities of the librarian.
Fialkof contends that today’s librarian roles are more attuned in meeting the user’s needs and
wants compared their early counterparts. Despite the controversies on whether Christian fictions
should be singled out in different sections, the author clarifies that the decisions to do with
library collection development should be based on the idea of selection and not censorship. The
author further alludes that decisions should be based on the knowledge to do with; local taste,
browsability, space issues, and ease of use of the collection.
This article provides a perspective on why librarians should consider the selection of
library materials and not censorship. Through the context of Christian fiction, the author tries to
explore on the importance of librarians seen it in a rounded perspective and not dismissing it as
lesser literary quality.
This resource is helpful to my paper since it tries to give librarians more reasons as to
why it’s essential to select than to censor with discerning reviews when it comes to library
collection development.
Citation 4:
Kincaid Courtney, (2018), Fired Up About Censorship, Texas Library Association Journal,
Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
Kincaid explores on the idea of censorship in libraries where she alludes the idea to the
process of removing, relocating and restricting access to various categories of library materials.
Further, the author describes the recommended procedures by the Texas Library Association
Intellectual Freedom Committee when it comes to the process of censorship. It is important to
note that throughout this article the author vocalizes on the idea of intellectual freedom.
Collectively, this article this article plays a vital role in discouraging censorship and
advocating for intellectual freedom within our libraries. One important aspect that this article
puts across is that students should be allowed to access any material they like allowing them to
decide on whether the material is appropriate or not.
This article is helpful in my paper since it extensively explores the idea of intellectual
freedom when it comes to library collection development and discouraging censorship.
Citation 5:
McMenemy David, (2007), Selection and Censorship: Librarian and Their Collections,
University of Strathclyde: Department of Computer and Information Science, Retrieved
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
As McMenemy states in the onset of his publication, the purpose of his work is to explore
the issues raised in the report “Hate on the State.” The author also explores on the ethical issues
that surround public libraries reflecting on the two ethical dilemmas which can be traced back in
2007 contending that they had the potential to damage the ethos of the librarian professions
despite their unique nature. Further, the author also addresses issues revolving around; the role of
the public library, censorship and selection of materials.
The findings of this study have raised fundamental questions, both regarding the role of
library facilitators and the responsibility of these facilitators in maintaining a balanced collection
when it comes to developing library collections.
This publication is useful in my paper since it gives a rationale as to why librarians
should maintain a balanced collection in our libraries and again because it considers a selection
of library materials as a fundamental aspect of the social contract between librarians and the
Citation 6:
Sloan Stephen, (2012), Regional Differences in Collecting Freethought Books in American
Public Libraries: A Case of Self-Censorship, University of Chicago, Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
Sloan acknowledges that censorship of library contents has been a controversial issue
concerning libraries contending that it remains an open topic of debate even today. In this article,
the author looks at the likelihood of self-restriction concerning freethought of library materials
within the APL broadly. To this end, it's rather clear that the author of this article tries to bring
out the idea of how there is a regional difference when it comes to collecting atheism books in
American public libraries.
This article provides a comprehensive rationale of how self-restriction assumes a vital
role in the accumulation of atheist books. Further, the author also provides a rationale as to why
censorship should not be practiced in the American libraries since it leads to silencing some
voices within the public arena.
This article is helpful in my paper since it provides a comprehensive rationale of how
library facilitators can take advantage of self-censorship despite censoring certain library
materials a move that is going to improve the social interaction between librarians and the users.
Citation 7:
Shore Mark, (2018), Collection Development in an Era of “Fake News,” Spring the Alert
Collector, Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
The author contends that it is challenging to decide on what goes into your collection
development policy in the today’s era. Notwithstanding, the author clears the air by stating that
his aim in this column is not to dictate on what libraries should do given a new age and the fake
news that comes with it. However, he contends that he aims to reaffirm and highlight on what his
colleagues have already adopted and had over the years have done since the edge of collection
development in libraries. The primary function of a librarian as noted in this article is to develop
diversified library collection as well engaging students so as to effectively handle the challenges
that come along with this new era.
This article provides a detailed framework on how librarians should conduct themselves
in ensuring that they come up with a valid collection development policy that fits the today’s era
as well as finding on better ways to mitigate the raising issue of “Fake News.”
This article is helpful in my paper since the author extensively advises on coming up with
a tightly written collection development policy which spells out on which approach to follow
when deciding on what goes into your collection as well developing a policy to mitigate
challenges surrounding the selection of library materials.
Citation 8:
Tsompanakis Spyros, (2014), A Discussion and Suggestions on Ethical Barriers in Librarianship:
Information Privacy, Controversial Materials and Personal Beliefs, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln, Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
The author of this publication bases his discussions on three moral issues that have turned
out to be critical obstructions in the library environment. These ethical issues that the author
addresses range from; controversial materials, information privacy and personal professions,
additionally the same issues are still covered in the American Library Association (ALA), code
of morals which fills in as a clear guideline. The author denotes that the barriers mentioned
earlier have by far threatened to challenge the effectiveness of librarianship. Further, the author
argues out that librarians ought to have a say in this, but they need to know how and when to use
it. Therefore, they have overall responsibility for evaluating what the user’s information source
but; they don’t have any responsibility for evaluating the user’s approaches as well goals.
This article provides a comprehensive overview of a librarian’s responsibility when it
comes to; upholding confidentiality on the issue of information privacy; a library ought to have a
material gathering strategy set up when it comes to controversial materials and further on
personal information. It also upholds that librarians must have a personal opinion but should
know how to use it and when to use it.
This article is helpful in my paper since it gives a detailed description of how authors can
put aside their own perspectives to maintain the three elements of codes of ethics communicated
in the ALA, for effectively developing a library collection which upholds; privacy and self-
Citation 9:
Osif Bonnie, (2005), Selection and Censorship: Library Administration and Management,
American Library Association, Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
The author contends that selection and censorship are fundamental issues when it comes
to library collection development. The author aims at shedding some light on the issue of
selection and censorship rather than fueling heat in the situation. Throughout the article, the
author is vocal on the idea of considering selection other than censorship when it comes library
collection development.
The article provides a rationale why library facilitators should consider selection over
censorship and how this move purposes to boost effectiveness in library collection development.
This publication is essential to my text since it provides a detailed description of why it is
vital to consider selection over censorship when it comes to library collection development given
the today’s level of globalization as well changing dynamics in intellectual freedom.
Citation 10:
Oltmann M. Shannon, (2016), Public Librarians’ Views on Collection Development and
Censorship, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, Retrieved from
Resource Sort:
Scholarly peer-reviewed
This publication is an overview on how public librarians undertake the process of
collection development as it also explores the idea of intellectual freedom. The author contends
that censorship can be made up of some practices which range from; labelling materials,
restricting access as well radiation of texts. The author does not fail to mention that the idea of
self-censorship which he contends it's causing various controversies and fostering intellectual
freedom and therefore emphasizing on the idea that libraries who consider selection over
censorship foster library collection development.
This article provides comprehensive information concerning why libraries should
consider selection over censorship and how self-censorship can help to foster library collection
This article is helpful in my paper since it highlights the barriers that come along with
censorship and how librarians as well library facilitators can utilize self-censorship as well
election in developing library collections.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.