RELATION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DOMESTIC LAW5
although it appeared as if the international law provision had acted over the domestic law, it is in
the real sense that the international law acted on the assumption of the domestic law by imposing
a penalty without considering the municipal law (“Alabama Claims, 1862-1872” n.p). The
decision clearly proves that a state cannot at any given time use provisions of its law to justify its
breach of international law. Thus, although both international and domestic laws are branches of
law, they belong to different subsections of the law. Noteworthy is that there is no way a country
can defend itself in a case involving a breach of international law using the provisions of its
domestic laws (Hall, 2013). This is to plainly mean that the international law does not recognize
any provisions of the domestic law.
Regarding the issue of enforceability if the laws, domestic law have more defined and
stricter systems of enforcement compared to the international law. Domestic law is closely
enforced by many state organs ranging from the constitution, the courts, and the enforcement
organs like the police (Hall, 2013). The international law, on the other hand, lacks clear
enforcement organs since there are no common institutions like the executive and the legislature.
Based on the enforcement, therefore, domestic law is easier to enforce than the international law.
To conclude, international and domestic laws have a definite symbiotic relationship in
whereby the two systems of law either work hand in hand or one is superior to the other in which
case, the international law always come first in considerations. Thus, it is necessary for
lawmakers, policy implementers, and the public to view these two branches as related contrary to
the public opinion, which views the systems as very different. Additionally, it is prudent to argue
that the nature of the relationship between the two sets of laws tends more towards monism than
to dualism. Monism is a bit realistic since it accepts the fact that there is a relationship between