Relationship between fdi and exports

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FDI AND EXPORTS
(Author’s name)
(Institutional Affiliation)
A. Mean Differences Using the Independent sample T-test
Mean H
Mean L
Mean
difference
T ratio
Sig.
1990
FDI per capita
51090.40759
2622.03559
48468.37200
2.460
0.000
Export per
capita
59056.64042
4997.21796
54056.64042
2.960
0.000
GDP per capita
43264.0650
333389.84420
399252.2208
2.221
0.001
2007
FDI per capita
333296.0003
49712.56448
305105.5897
2.799
0.000
Export per
capita
205232.8941
28190.41055
155520.3296
2.519
0.004
GDP per capita
1067668.551
166582.3215
901086.2295
2.044
0.005
2014
FDI per capita
389665.3619
66275.77171
389665.3619
2.357
0.01
Export per
capita
261173.7262
90509.4320
170664.2942
1.835
0.07
GDP per capita
1242393.99
385942.9448
856451.0452
1.455
0.07
The independent t-test shows the mean difference between the groups L and H, the T ratio the
mean and the level of significance is used determine when to reject a null hypothesis while
testing the significant difference.
H
0
: There is no significant difference in means H and L
H
1
: There is a significant difference in means H and L(Libguides.library.kent.edu, 2017).
In all the cases there is a difference in the means of H and L, but is the difference significant?
In 1990 and 2007, the sig value is less than 0.05 therefore, we reject H
0
and conclude that there is
significant difference in the means H and L.
In 2014, Export per capita and GDP per capita have no significant difference since 0.07>0.05,
therefore we do not reject the null hypothesis. While the FDI per capita has significant difference
between the means since 0.01<0.05(Hinton, 2004).
B. Correlation between the FDI ,GDP and Exports per capita Through the Years
FDI per capita
Exports per capita
GDP per capita
FDI per capita
1
0.884
0.928
Exports per capita
0.884
1
0.842
GDP per capita
0.928
0.842
1
FDI per capita
1
0.697
0.938
Exports per capita
0.697
1
0.766
GDP per capita
0.938
0.766
1
FDI per capita
1
0.681
0.287
Exports per capita
0.681
1
0.851
GDP per capita
0.287
0.851
1
Conclusion
In 1990: FDI per capita has a strong positive correlation of 0.884 with the Exports per capita.
FDI per capita has a strong positive correlation of 0.928 with the GDP per capita.
GDP per capita has a strong positive correlation of 0.842 with the GDP per capita(Hinton, 2004).
In 2007: FDI per capita has a strong positive correlation of 0.697 with the exports per capita.
FDI per capita has a strong positive correlation of 0.938 with the GDP per capita.
GDP per capita has a strong positive correlation of 0.0.766 with the GDP per capita(Anon,
2017).
In 2014: FDI per capita has a strong positive correlation with the Exports per capita.
FDI per capita has a weak positive correlation of 0.287 with the GDP per capita.
GDP per capita has a strong positive correlation of 0.851 with the GDP per capita(SPSS 15.0
brief guide, 2006).
C. Regression on the ln of the variables
i. Regression on FDI only
Coefficient values
Significance of
coefficients
R
2
B
0
B
1
1990
lnFDI per capita
3.618
0.628
0.000
0.577
2007
lnFDI per capita
0.197
0.945
0.000
0.691
2014
lnFDI per capita
-1.332
1.064
0.000
0.707
Comments
H
0
: The coefficient is not significant in predicting the Exports per capita
H
1
: The coefficient is significant in predicting the Exports per capita
The sig value of the years 1990, 2007 and 2014, 0.000<0.05, we thereby reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that all the coefficients are significant in predicting Exports per capita.
The B
0
indicates the values the change in Export per capita whenever the FDI per capita is zero.
B
1
indicates the change in Exports per capita for every unit increase in the FDI per capita.
R
2
depicts the percentage of the model that predicts the y variable. In 1990, R
2
=57.7% indicating
that the model explains 57.7% of the Exports per capita. In 2007, R
2
=69.1% indicating that the
model explains 69.1% of the Exports per capita. In 2014, R
2
=70.7% indicating that the model
explains 70.7% of the Exports per capita.
ii. Regression on FDI and GDP
Coefficient
value
Significance of
coefficient
R
2
Constant
-1.725
0.000
0.875
lnFDI per capita
0.103
0.000
0.875
lnGDP per capita
0.915
0.000
0.875
Constant
-2.614
0.000
0.897
lnFDI per capita
0.016
0.000
0.897
lnGDP per capita
1.091
0.000
0.897
Constant
-2.537
0.000
0.821
lnFDI per capita
0.737
0.000
0.821
lnGDP per capita
0.520
0.000
0.821
H
0
: The coefficient is not significant in predicting the Exports per capita
H
1
: The coefficient is significant in predicting the Exports per capita
The sig value of the years 1990, 2007 and 2014, 0.000<0.05, we thereby reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that all the coefficients are significant in predicting Exports per capita.
The Constant indicates the values the change in Export per capita whenever the FDI per capita is
zero. lnFDI per capita indicates the change in Exports per capita for every unit increase in the
FDI per capita all factors held constant. lnGDP per capita indicates the change in Exports per
capita for every unit increase in the FDI per capita all factors held constant(Huizingh, 2007).
In 1990, R
2
=87.5% indicating that the model explains 87.5% of the Exports per capita. In 2007,
R
2
=89.5% indicating that the model explains 89.5% of the Exports per capita. In 2014,
R
2
=82.1% indicating that the model explains 82.1% of the Exports per capita.
D. Regression per Sample
L countries
Coefficient
value
Significance of
coefficient
R
2
Constant
-1.371
0.000
0.859
lnFDI per capita
0.154
0.000
0.859
lnGDP per capita
0.844
0.000
0.859
Constant
-2.925
0.000
0.903
lnFDI per capita
0.210
0.000
0.903
lnGDP per capita
0.958
0.000
0.903
Constant
-2.734
0.000
0.877
lnFDI per capita
0.848
0.000
0.877
lnGDP per capita
0.393
0.000
0.877
H countries
Coefficient
value
Significance of
coefficient
R
2
Constant
-2.717
0.000
0.858
lnFDI per capita
0.030
0.000
0.858
lnGDP per capita
1.098
0.000
0.858
Constant
-2.537
0.000
0.859
lnFDI per capita
-0.111
0.000
0.859
lnGDP per capita
1.197
0.000
0.859
Constant
1.010
0.000
0.855
lnFDI per capita
0.083
0.000
0.855
lnGDP per capita
1.025
0.000
0.855
From the tables above, it is clear that the L models predict the Exports per capita better than the
H values. This is due to the increasing R
2
values from L to H. The coefficients remain significant
in predicting the Y variable.
E. Regression as per the Dummy Variables.
Comments on L
H
0
: The coefficient is not significant in predicting the Exports per capita
H
1
: The coefficient is significant in predicting the Exports per capita(Anon, 2017)
The sig value of the years 1990, 2007 and 2014, 0.000<0.05, we thereby reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that all the coefficients are significant in predicting Exports per capita.
The Constant indicates the values the change in Export per capita whenever the FDI and GDP
per capita is zero. lnFDI per capita indicates the change in Exports per capita for every unit
increase in the FDI per capita all factors held constant. lnGDP per capita indicates the change in
Exports per capita for every unit increase in the FDI per capita all factors held constant(Anon,
2017).
In 1990, R
2
=85.9% indicating that the model explains 85.9% of the Exports per capita. In 2007,
R
2
=90.3% indicating that the model explains 90.3% of the Exports per capita. In 2014,
R
2
=87.7% indicating that the model explains 87.7% of the Exports per capita(Liu et al., 2003).
Comments on H
H
0
: The coefficient is not significant in predicting the Exports per capita
H
1
: The coefficient is significant in predicting the Exports per capita
The sig value of the years 1990, 2007 and 2014, 0.000<0.05, we thereby reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that all the coefficients are significant in predicting Exports per capita.
The Constantindicates the values the change in Export per capita whenever the FDI per capita is
zero. lnFDI per capita indicates the change in Exports per capita for every unit increase in the
FDI per capita all factors held constant. lnGDP per capita indicates the change in Exports per
capita for every unit increase in the FDI per capita all factors held constant.
In 1990, R
2
=85.8% indicating that the model explains 85.8% of the Exports per capita. In 2007,
R
2
=85.9% indicating that the model explains 85.9% of the Exports per capita. In 2014,
R
2
=85.5% indicating that the model explains 85.5% of the Exports per capita.
References
Anon, (2017). [online] Available at: https://statistics.laerd.com/spss_tutorials/linear-regression-
using-spss-statistics.php [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017].
Hinton, P. (2004). SPSS explained. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
Huizingh, E. (2007). Applied statistics with SPSS. 1st ed. London: SAGE.
Libguides.library.kent.edu. (2017). LibGuides: SPSS Tutorials: Independent Samples t Test.
[online] Available at: http://libguides.library.kent.edu/SPSS/IndependentTTest [Accessed 4 Apr.
2017].
Liu, R., Kuang, J., Gong, Q. and Hou, X. (2003). Principal component regression analysis with
spss. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 71(2), pp.141-147.
SPSS 15.0 brief guide. (2006). 1st ed. Chicago, Ill.: SPSS Inc.
Anon, (2017). Using SPSS for Correlation. [online] Available at:
http://http://academic.udayton.edu/GregElvers/psy216/spss/cor.htm [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017].

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.