COMMUNICATION DURING INTEGRATION 8
environment of the organization; ‘pinning boards' and common rooms are a great outlet.
Mailing lists should be used to ensure a wide reach—this approach also applies when
communicating to external stakeholders. How does one know that sense-making was
achieved with the wide information distribution? Only with feedback, can efficacy in
delivering information can be assessed (Radhaswamy & Zia, 2011).
iv. Web 2.0 Technologies
How can information channeling be designed in such a way that timely feedback
provision is possible? Digitization of communication and the availability of Web 2.0
technologies have made it possible to obtain feedback in an effective manner; corporate blogs
are, for instance, important to efficiency in internal communication (Donald & Sarah, 2010).
Blogs not only allow for feedback, but also allow for the exploration of alternative views,
which greatly enhances the approaches adopted the organization.
v. Small diverse teams with an assigned manager
Notably, corporate cultures vary most of the time; therefore, once the integration process
is initiated, collisions among personnel from either side are highly likely. Culture collisions
need to be contained for success in integration (DePamphilia, 2009; Galtabiano, n.d.). In
order to achieve containment or mitigation, the decision-making on the manner in which
integration will be achieved should be done in holistic consultation. While early
communication as earlier discussed is vital, the top management should also be active in
ensuring that the merging teams start viewing each other as one, and start working towards
oneness. Roles in the merger should be clarified, and so is the decision-making chain, as well
as any other changes that are important to the company’s structure and its strategic goals.
Further, small teams built out of the larger integrating teams, and within which duties
and information are shared during the transitioning period, has been shown to buffer