Response Paper 3
7. According to Judt, Germans largely avoided admitting their role in the
Holocaust between 1945 and the late-1950s. How and why did this change near
the end of the 1950s?
Even after the attack on the European, some countries found it difficult to admit their
voluntary participation during the holocaust. For Germany, it came to admit its misdeed in
the late 1950s, and even sparked reconciliatory meetings with the affected nations.
8. For nearly forty years after World War II, Judt writes, the Swiss “basked in
their clear conscience and the envious admiration of the world” for not having
taken part in the Holocaust. What finally led the Swiss to acknowledge their role
in the Holocaust?
While history depicted Switzerland as a haven of peace where the persecuted could run to, it
later became evident after a conducted investigation that they were just as actively informed.
With all these evidence in play, it became important for the Swiss to acknowledge their
participation by denouncing their clean reputation.
9. Why, according to Judt, were the French unable to argue that the murder of
French Jews was simply the result of top-down orders issued by the Nazis during
the German occupation of France (1940-1944)?
As the war progressed, majority of the fleeing German Jews found comfort in France where
they settled peacefully. After changing the immigration laws and coming to an agreement
with Germany in June 1940, the country exposed its immigrants to the Nazi once again; thus,
more deaths. With this in mind, it is impossible for France to blame the top-down orders
issued by the Nazis as the main factor contributing to the holocaust in 1940-1944.
10. Judt warns us that we should be careful to not gratuitously celebrate European
acknowledgement of the Holocaust. What, counterintuitively, are the risks