Social Psychology In Reduction Of Prejudice

Running head: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 1

Social Psychology in Reduction of Prejudice

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 2

Social Psychology in Reduction of Prejudice

Cultural mix sometime results in social prejudice in conjunction with the mentally ill

individuals. There have been various strategies that aim at reducing prejudice that is enmeshed in

victimization of individuals with mental issues. One of the ways of reducing prejudice is by

involving clinical psychologists and social groups in various approaches of reducing prejudice on

the mentally ill individuals through enhancing associations. Additionally, the psychologists try to

minimize the social stigma through educating the society on how to approach mentally ill

individuals to get better understanding of the social situation thus reducing prejudice. The reason

this is essential is that it reduces any possible development of discrimination among people with

mental health thus solving the challenge of prejudice. Chen (2015), described culture as a “network

of knowledge which is generated, distributed and reproduced among interconnected people.”

Another aspect of reducing prejudice is by interconnecting various cultures to pave way for finding

solutions to the mentally challenged individuals. Some culture view mental illness as curse and

people with such problem are seen as condemned. Therefore, interconnecting cultures will provide

opportunity to learn from people from different culture on how they handle mentally challenged

persons. Thus, the reduction of prejudice is enhanced due formation of harmonious relationships.

Therefore, this research paper analyzes the possible mental health approaches and psychological

processes towards the possible ways by which social psychology reduces prejudice.

Applications of Clinical Psychology Approaches as a Solution to Prejudice

Reduction of mental illness prejudice involves the application of subjective experiences of

acquiring and making negotiations concerning cultures and formation of friendship appeals

towards such people. For instance, when various ethnic groups collaborate, they enhance the

reduction of the constraints of prejudice. Similarly, promotion of positive associations and

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 3

enhancing high orientation to both heritage and dominant cultures hence enabling the reduction of

prejudice (Chen, 2015, p. 1). Moreover, aspects of internalizing the conflict between two or more

intersecting cultures enhances the aspects of reducing mental illness prejudice by integrating a

good culture which enhancing perception that mentally ill people are normal human being. For

instance, learning the actions taken by various people concerning psychosocial problems as an

effect on other member of the society handle such challenges.

As a clinical psychologist, Chen (2015), offers the most appropriate ways of reducing

mental illness prejudice. He was always alluded to the aspects of incorporating cultural context

which enables individuals to engage in multiethnic society and multicultural policy that promotes

associations amid of enhancing identity in a globalized good culture or nation. Chen (2015, p. 4),

mentioned that immigration-based and globalization-based acculturation enhance harmonious

associations in line with reduction of prejudice through social psychology. The challenges usually

connected to multiple ethnic groups across the globe can be solved through acculturation in line

with the reduction of mental illness prejudice. Social psychology studies enhance the best

treatment of each member of the society. Individuals are thereby treated relatively amid acquiring

equivalent status despite their personal challenge (Chuа, 2010). Acculturation and the aspect of

focusing on biculturalism enhances moral associations which end up transforming the ethnic

differences to ethnic acceptance thus reducing the aspect of prejudice.

Challenges that Clients Have Been Facing Due to Prejudice Connected to Mental Illness

Throughout the clinical psychology practice, clients have proved that they experience

discrimination and extreme prejudice from the people who they are supposed to associate with.

Most clients outline that they face social distance due to problems connected to psychosis as the

condition makes the clients to be perceived as dangerous (Corbière, Samson, Villotti & Pelletier,

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 4

2012). On the other hand, most men with schizophrenia fail to get partners to marry amid being

flagged down in their endeavors in job market. Most of the employed individuals outline that they

face discrimination in the workplaces. Additionally, the families that contain the clients tend to

suffer stigma and unprecedented prejudice as a result of the threat that the clients are perceived to

cause.

Control of the Problems Caused by Prejudice and Social Stigma on Clients

The most appropriate way of handling the clients under the constraints of social stigma is

de-stigmatization. Additionally, as a clinical psychologist, I have been trying the approach of

person-centered strategy. Additionally, coming up with a better education approach to the

perpetrators of prejudice has been the goal of clinical psychologists which is the most appropriate

way of enhancing recovery and improving social inclusion (Corbière et al., 2012). Similarly, home

visits help to curb the problems that mentally ill and isolated individuals to reduce the stigma that

they suffer due to prejudice.

Enhancements of Associations in Line with reduction of Prejudice

Corrigan and Penn (2015), outlined the various aspect of prevention of prejudice that is

connected to psychiatric stigma through enhancing associations. The study outlined that promoting

contact with the general public through education not only reduces aspects of prejudice but also

improves the connections that limit the development of psychological trauma which might lead to

the development of schizophrenia. Reduction of stigmatization approaches enables individuals to

carry on a life that is free from mental health and aspects of prejudice.

There is a need to study the factors that contribute to prejudice on the mentally ill

individuals. For that matter, Corrigan and Penn (2015), outlined the preconceived judgment that

schizophrenia makes individuals develop extreme stigma that results in more mental challenges

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 5

thus causing them to be discriminated more by other members of the society. Corrigan and Penn

(2015), found out that there are various concerns and stereotypic issues outlining that “people with

mental illness are homicidal maniacs who need to be feared.” Also, it was outlined that the social

stigma concerning schizophrenia is concerned with the notion that the people who have

schizophrenia have “childlike perception concerning the world and they are rebellious in all that

they are associated (Corrigan & Penn, 2015, p. 2).’’ Since disabilities lead to disparaging opinions,

reduction of prejudice involves enhancing social connections with the outer world through

bilingualism. People will always be able to learn more about others through multilingual appeals

that enable people to get along with various cultures and social connections.

Reduction of Prejudice Through Clinical Psychology Approaches

As a clinical psychologist, I have the idea that the reduction of prejudice involves an

intensive study of several severe mental complications to develop a character well affiliated

towards enhancing relationships with all people irrespective of their physical or mental disabilities.

Therefore, as a psychological clinician, I have been able to take part in the reduction of prejudice

through adopting harsh advocacy and formation of target groups as a deliberate attempt towards

improving the lives of people with severe mental health complications. For better approaches

towards ending mental illness prejudice, it requires launching campaigns towards ending

discrimination and preconceived judgment on people with mental illness. Corrigan and Penn

(2015), stated that the government through structured social psychology groups make an effort

towards enhancing vigilance misrepresentation of various mental issues as a way of reducing the

psychological trauma amid the reduction of prejudice. Erase stigma campaign is used to reduce

social stigma in the society through some forms of great social psychological aspects of the decline

of social stigma.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 6

Another way of reducing prejudice on mental illness is developing programs through

Clinical Psychology that diminish stereotypes and stigma. Protesting unfairness involves aspects

of decreasing situations whereby the experiences concerning the issue occur. Reduction of

prejudice requires repletion of mental shame through coming up with media watch kits as an effort

to seek change towards mental illness. Reduction of discrimination and social stigma involves the

action of limiting mischievous acts against the mentally ill people through media games and crazy

portraits that undermines the mentally ill people. Corrigan and Penn (2015), mentioned that

reduction of prejudice involves much than just theoretical appeals but more of writing letters and

meeting with people’s publishers to establish a proper request towards publishing improper scripts

that violates the social wellbeing of the mentally challenged. The above examples tend to offer

protection to the endorsed public stereotypes thus reduces the issues of prejudice. Corrigan and

Penn (2015), outlined that many people tend to find a breakthrough to their problems, but the

struggles end up diminishing due to lack of the required moral support.

Reduction of prejudice through stigma reduction through clinical psychology strategies are

well attained by conducting separate approach which is isolated from one another. Corrigan and

Penn (2015), outlined that an advocate can decide to educate the media groups on possible ways

of reducing prejudice by avoiding posts that in one way or another dehumanize mental illness. In

that perspective, social stigma and prejudice can be minimized in a well-structured manner. Social

psychology and the suppression of people to bias has yielded a set of workable approaches towards

the reduction of prejudice (Corrigan & Penn, 2015). It was also outlined that suppression takes

place with a game of controlled inhibition of the unwanted stereotypic thoughts which are revealed

when people no longer endorse fail to recall specific stereotypes.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 7

Reduction of Mental Illness Prejudice through Public Education

As a way of reducing prejudice, Corrigan and Penn (2015), outlined that the public need

to be educated on issues concerning mental illness to avoid imposing unprecedented challenges to

the affected individuals with their families. Education and information programs need to be put up

as a way of informing the public about the difficulties of imposing social stigma to the mentally

ill population amid their loved ones. In that manner, the research found out that the minority groups

need to be urged to attend functions that outline the possible ways of working with the public

health and psychiatrist to determine the possible methods of treating mental challenges like autism

and schizophrenia instead of imposing problems on the affected population. Educating the general

public is the best approach towards the reduction of social stigma and prejudice concerning the

people with mental illness and incapability.

Corrigan and Penn’s (2015, p. 6), research outlined that “participation in short courses

concerning the reduction of social stigma concerning mental illness improves the attitudes of

people concerning mental illness. Brief courses provide a chance for the participants to be able to

discover the vices that cause more mental illness prejudice to the mentally challenged individuals.

For that matter, the participants can learn about the best ways to handle the mentally ill people and

carry them through the process of attaining the best mental condition required through mental

therapy and other psychological support. Another way of reducing the social stigma as perpetuated

by most people in the society is by encouraging people to take part in aspects of starting and

maintain close contact with the people with severe mental illness to enable them to realize healing

and the value of associating with people in the society. Corrigan and Penn (2015, p. 9), asserted

that “the minority groups in the society are likely to be able to shun and disconfirm stereotypes

through describing the groups that are suffering from a given mental issue.” Therefore, it is clear

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 8

that starting and maintaining contact programs will later lead to the reduction of social stigma,

stereotypes, and prejudice among groups of people in the society. For that matter, it will be easy

to start and maintain healthy relationships with all groups of people in the community.

Applying Social Psychology in the Modern Society

G (2015), asserted that shaping people’s thinking enables the formation of the required

approaches towards social psychology in line with enhancing better association towards the

reduction of prejudice. Currently, the society is more affiliated to online communication thus it is

a viable approach to communicate the required information about the enhancement of social

psychology in line with strategies for reducing social stigma and prejudice through communicating

to the general public through media handles like blogs and Facebook concerning mental issues and

ways of handling mentally challenged individuals.

Clinical psychologists tend to develop desirable skills and practices concerning the use of

social media to air out the possible strategies concerning the reduction of prejudice connected to

mental health challenges (Chernack, 2013). As a clinical psychologist, the best approaches I need

to be put in place to communicate to the larger population on social media concerning ways of

reducing prejudice that is connected to mental illness. Psychologist tends to focus on possible ways

of attending to the public which is so much affiliated to the technological advancement about the

issue of social stigma and prejudice concerning people with mental problems (Sue, Rasheed &

Rasheed, 2015). Therefore, to ensure that the intended message is received undistorted, tweets and

posts should be made after thorough speculation of the privacy settings to ensure that integrity is

maintained. Addressing the issue of mental problems involves maintaining the required integrity

in managing groups and enhancing relationships among people as a way of focusing on reducing

prejudice.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 9

Applying Social Psychology to Contemporary Society

Psychology and mental wellbeing need to extend its strategy beyond theoretical appeal to

proper communication of the message of reduction of prejudice. G (2015), asserted that

psychologists’ blogging within the right privacy settings will shape the society to allude to the

required approaches towards the reduction of social stigma and prejudice concerning people with

mental health issues. Consequently, there should be a robust analysis of the actions required to

maintain an ethical communication in the platforms.

On the other hand, psychosocial well-being provides a platform for pointing out the

challenges that individuals face in their life and the problems that humans pass through regarding

their social well-being. Through proper adoption of the mental psychologists will be able to solve

the issues concerning prejudice and social stigma so long as the required education is controlled

to reach as many social media users as possible (G, 2015). To maintain the ethical practice in

mental health approaches and reduction of prejudice, individuals need to allude to the required

ethical practice and principles of concerning dealing with people with mental problems (G, 2015).

Confronting Individual Differences

Gollwitzer, Christ, and Lemmer, (2014), mentioned that behavior treatment is the proper

way of enhancing social associations and reducing prejudice and social stigma. Behavior changes

trigger a psychological reaction thus analyzing individual differences tries to solve the social issues

among people. The extra change also enhances the confrontation of possible social factors that

bring about prejudice and social stigma. The identification of the changes that humans pass through

education the general public about the changes provides grounds for people to understand the

problems that poor mental upbringing results amid deciding on the possible way to help the

mentally challenged. Kende, Ujhelyi, Joinson, and Greitemeyer (2015), asserted that Facebook

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 10

had been the most used social media platform that can be used for social work communication.

Kende et al. (2015), outlined that intro and interpersonal relationships can be achieved through the

responsible use of social media platforms which promotes the rights of mentally ill individuals.

The multicultural study into social well-being was structured out by Lomas (2015)

research. Lomas (2015), outlines the need to develop positive psychology which is a social belief

that focuses on all positive attitudes and acts that value the wellbeing of other people. Subjective

well-being is highly emphasized to promote the best social practices that prevent all aspects of

prejudice. Social-cultural interventions are highly prioritized by Lomas (2015, p. 2), to enhance

both social and physical environment for every stakeholder. On the other hand, Migacheva (2015),

identification of human rights improves the approaches towards a reduction of prejudice. For

instance, through the permeability of the US policies for the national association and foreign

policies regarding human rights, it is clear that discrimination is managed through following clear

identified human rights policies.

Reamer Model of Social Psychology and Ethical Dilemma

Reamer model of ethical dilemma can be used to solve the mental illness prejudice that is

mostly perpetrated on social media as a platform. It can be used for enhancing mental health

wellbeing amid solving the issues that bring about prejudice and social stigma. However, proper

adherence to the privacy policies will offer grounds for solving most of the issues concerning

prejudice and social stigma that surrounds the issue of mental health problems (Chernack, 2013).

Conclusion

In summation, most of the mentally ill individuals continue to face prejudice in the society

due to the medical condition. They continue to be seen as dangerous people who should be

associate with. Furthermore, some cultures beliefs that mental illness results from curse and such

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 11

people are condemned. Therefore, it has been found out that enhancement of bicultural identity

enhances the process of improving racial associations. Chen outlined that globalization and

improvement of human rights intensify psychology and literature. It has also been discovered that

when people engage in social associations and education regarding the change of the unfriendly

appeal to the mentally ill people reduces the aspects of developing prejudice. Additionally,

enhancing social interconnection reduces mental illness prejudice. Also, behavior treatment is the

proper way of enhancing social associations and reducing prejudice and social stigma. Behavior

changes trigger a psychological reaction thus analyzing individual differences tries to solve the

social issues among people. Maintaining ethical practice in mental health approaches and reduction

of prejudice is promoted by the individual need to allude to the required ethical practice and

principles of concerning dealing with people with mental problems.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 12

References

Chen, S. X. (2015). Toward a social psychology of bilingualism and biculturalism. Asian Journal

of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1-

11. http://proxy1.calsouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc

t=true&db=pbh&AN=100419998&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Chernack, K. (2013). Social media use and social work practice: Boundary and ethical solutions.

Retrieved from http://www.insocialwork.org/episode.asp?ep=110

Corbière, M., Samson, E., Villotti, P. and Pelletier, J. (2012). Strategies to Fight Stigma toward

People with Mental Disorders: Perspectives from Different Stakeholders. The Scientific

World Journal, 2012, pp.1-10.

Chuа, S.K.C., (2010). Singapore’s cultural policy and its globalized concept of Bi (tri)

lingualism. Current Issues in cultural Planning, 11(4), pp.413-429

Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (2015). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting

psychiatric stigma. Stigma and Health, 1(S), 2-17. doi:10.1037/2376-

6972.1.S.2 http://proxy1.calsouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.asp

x?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2015-27522-002&site=ehost-live&scope=site

G., K. (2015). Applying social psychology to contemporary society. Psychologist, 28(7), 542-

543. http://proxy1.calsouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire

ct=true&db=pbh&AN=103603126&site=ehost-live&scope=site

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN REDUCTION OF PREJUDICE 13

Gollwitzer, M., Christ, O., & Lemmer, G. (2014). Individual differences make a difference: On

the use and the psychometric properties of difference scores in social psychology.

European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 673-

682. http://proxy1.calsouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire

ct=true&db=pbh&AN=100011228&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Kende, A., Ujhelyi, A., Joinson, A., & Greitemeyer, T. (2015, April). Putting the social

(psychology) into social media. European Journal of Social Psychology. pp. 277-

278. http://proxy1.calsouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire

ct=true&db=pbh&AN=102271754&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Lomas, T. (2015). Positive social psychology: A multilevel inquiry into sociocultural well-being

initiatives. Psychology, Public Policy, And Law, 21(3), 338-347.

doi:10.1037/law0000051 http://proxy1.calsouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.

com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2015-24690-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Migacheva, K. (2015). Searching for puzzle pieces: How (social) psychology can help inform

human rights policy. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(1), 142-149.

doi:10.1037/pac0000089 http://proxy1.calsouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.

com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2015-06092-010&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Sue, D. W., Rasheed, M. N., & Rasheed, J. M. (2015). Multicultural social work practice: A

competency-based approach to diversity and social justice. John Wiley & Sons.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Paper type

Deadline

Page count

550 words

Total price: $ 15.00

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Ian McGregor

UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Shannon Williams

Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."