Running head: RESILIENCE AND COLLEGE RETENTION   1 
 
Literature Review 
The Nature of Resilience 
Several empirical studies on resilience have been conducted over the last couple of years. 
Following these studies, experts have expressed different opinions regarding the nature and 
importance of resilience. Resilience has been associated with the ability of an individual to adapt 
to adversity (Becker, Cicchetti & Luthar, 2000; Fleming and Ledogar, 2008; Jones et al. 2012). 
To this extent, many scholars agree that resilience is a dynamic process that encompasses 
positive adaptation to significant adversity (Becker, Cicchetti and Luthar, 2000).  In other words, 
resilience is characterized by an individual’s capacity to flexibly adapt to changing demands of 
stressful situations and, therefore, their ability to “bounce back” from negative emotional 
experiences.  Resilience is closely related to optimism, zest, curiosity, openness to new 
experiences, positive emotionality, sustained competence under stress, and energy among other 
positive traits (Becker, Cicchetti and Luthar, 2000; Fleming and Ledogar, 2008).   
While resilience has traditionally been considered a characteristic of the individual 
(Becker, Cicchetti & Luthar, 2000; Jones et al. 2012, more recently, scholars have associated it 
with entire communities (Fleming & Ledogar, 2008).  In their review of the literature on the 
scientific construct of resilience and its evolution, Fleming and Ledogar (2008) focused on 
aboriginal resilience. The scholars analyzed different theories and perspectives on resilience and 
its relation to risk.  According to the scholars, one qualifying condition that many researchers 
rely on to qualify resilience is the presence of demonstrable substantial risk or stress.  The 
researchers analyzed three general categories of resilience models; challenge, protective and 
compensatory.  The researchers noted that the challenge model holds that high and low levels of 
exposure to risk factors are associated with negative results while moderate levels of the risk