SOLITARY CONFINEMENT
The article has various strengths that are evident from the way it is professionally written.
For instance, authors of the article carry out a thorough and comprehensive research that is seen
from the way the article cites information from several scholars and sources. At the end of the
article, there is a reference list to provide proof that indeed the article is a research work and just
opinions of the authors. The use of various sources in the article makes it a credible and authentic
source that can be used for further research. As well, the article uses simple vocabulary that is
easy to read and understand. Besides, the article uses tables and figures to further clarify the
concept being discussed.
However, the article has one major weakness of covering so many concepts that may
confuse the reader. At some point, the reader may get bored and wonder how some of the
concepts covered in the article relate to the main issue of harsh environmental conditions that
capital punishment inmates are confined in. For that reason, the reader has to go through the
entire article word for word to understand the relationship between wasted resources and the
gratuitous suffering of inmates.
In conclusion, the article is a must-read piece of work for individuals interested in
understanding the life that capital punishment inmates lead in prison. Also, the article clarifies to
readers that the failure of assumptions of high violence risk is silently supporting death row and
has a significant correctional implication. Therefore, I recommend the article to any reader out
there because reading this timely written piece of work gives the reader an insight and a clear
picture of activity deprivation and interpersonal isolation that capital punishment prisoners
experience every day of their lives.