SPACE PROGRAMS 2
Space Programs
Ongoing advancements in technology and multiple logistical advantages have
encouraged the expansion of space programs by the developed countries with many others
accelerating the development of space related technologies. Some of the countries that have
broadened their space exploration programs include the U.S., Russia, China, Japan, Canada, and
India (Burleson, 2005). The U.S., China, and Russia are the only countries on earth that have
managed to put people within space independently. China and India have signaled intentions of
doing the same in the near future. Many policy critics have argued against the expansion of the
space programs on the grounds of the large budgetary allocations and presumed
inappropriateness of the missions. In the view of many critics, the money used on the programs
should be channeled to causes such as poverty eradication and the provision of essential services
such as education, healthcare, counterterrorism, and other matters of immediate concern.
Growing opposition against space programs is largely based on the fact that planet earth
continues to face significant challenges and risks, which should be addressed with money from
the various space programs. Moreover, the critics contend that the research input that is often
directed towards space programs should be channeled towards programs that aim towards the
improvement of the conditions that continue to afflict the modern world (Harvey, Smid & Pirard,
2010). Some of the pressing problems that continue to attract the attention of world leaders
include global warming, the HIV/AIDS pandemic, global terrorism, cancer, and
underdevelopment in many parts of the world (Callmers, 2008). In the opinion of some critics,
the budgetary allocation for space programs should be redirected to such problems, which
threaten the survival of whole societies across the globe. Such perspectives are usually supported
by opposition groups, environmental lobbyists and activists of different causes.