ROBERT ERIK DENNEY MURDER CASE 4
Denney had been meticulous in ensuring investigators could not get any DNA samples and even
refused a voluntary request.
However, the suspect spat in a parking lot handing investigators the final piece to directly
connect him to the crime. As Burmeister (2001) reports, the saliva evidence collected by officers
who had been monitoring the suspect finally placed Mr. Denney inside the victim’s kitchen
matching to the hair and saliva evidence that had been gathered during the investigation. In the
arrest of the suspect, fingerprints, blood, hair, and semen samples – some still unidentified –
were relied upon to place him at the crime scene. The DNA evidence was the heart of the case
alongside a statement the killer had made to an undercover investigating officer in which he
never denied having been in Corey’s apartment. Among all the fingerprints found in the victim’s
apartment, Denney had been the only one who denied ever being there which further raised
suspicion on his intentions for being in the house.
Case analysis
The State of Florida vs. Robert Erik Denney (Murder) 1998, Jacksonville, FL case was a
long engagement that involved hundreds of witnesses for the prosecution and defense sides. The
prosecution side led by Assistant State Attorney Angela Corey built their case around the DNA
evidence, a lighter, statements and relationship to a convicted murderer to establish Mr.
Denney’s connection to the murder. While the prosecution that implied a sense of guilt in the
suspect’s refusal to give saliva a saliva sample, Circuit Judge Peter Dearing ruled that it would
not be considered as an admission of guilt or aired before the jury. The defense was tasked with
addressing how their client’s blood had gotten to the victim’s apartment which they could not
find a way. To dispel the attempts by the defense to bring other possible suspects into the fold,
the prosecution spent some significant time systematically eliminating other suspects of the case