Sweatshop

Surname 1
Name
Instructor
Subject
Date
Sweatshop
Globalization has created good business relations between the developing and the
developed countries but has also led to the developed of sweatshops. The developing countries
specialize in manufacturing while the developed countries specialize on marketing. Although
most people advocate for the elimination of sweatshops claiming that they are inhumane and
dangerous, Maitland approaches the issue from a totally different perspective. He does not
escape the charges such as child labor and abuses of human rights levied on sweatshops but he
thinks that the people who create awareness on such issues do it for attention and publicity. In
“The Great Non-Debatable over International Sweatshops”, Ian Maitland justifies the existence
of sweatshops and their relatively poor working conditions in an ethical way to try and convince
the public that the workers are equally responsible for everything that happens to them.
First, Maitland argues that the wages in the sweatshops are comparable in the labor
market where they operate from, so he wonders why critics complain about poor wages. He adds
that the demand for factory jobs is very high in the developing countries following the high level
of unemployment and poverty. Many people apply for jobs in the sweatshops with a knowledge
of the wages offered since it is the best deal they can get. They even accept the low wages freely
and willingly without being forced by their employers, which Maitland finds convincing that the
Surname 2
wage issue is an ethical one since there is a clear understanding. Again, the workers are fully
aware of the hostile working environment yet they still want to provide their services without
being coerced by anyone, which is why Maitland argues that what happens to them is totally
their fault.
Moreover, the developed countries do not exploit the developing ones according to
Maitland but instead, their investments help build the economy. Critics argue that the developed
countries exploit the developing ones through the issue of sweatshops. Maitland argues that
countries are independent entities and can choose to allow foreign investments or not. However,
they benefit from the investments from the developed countries, which is why some even give
tax incentives to attract foreign investors. They willingly enter into business deals without being
forced thus Maitland does not hold the investors responsible for what happens in the sweatshops.
Therefore, the establishment of manufacturing factories in the developing countries is ethical and
it transforms the nation and its citizens.
Maitland equalizes the wealth created by sweatshops to political freedom, which explains
why countries, where the sweatshops are located, have repressive governments. A repressive
government is essential for a politically and economically unstable nation to maintain stability.
Maitland is just trying to justify the massive wealth created by the sweatshops at the expense of
the workers. Maitland knows that peace is the number one priority in every nation since conflicts
affect its operations, which is why he connects the wealth created by sweatshops with political
stability to make it less evil.
Lastly, Maitland argues that it is ethical for employers to refrain from unnecessary
expenditures to improve the safety of the workers. He is concerned about the high cost of
improving the safety of workers which he believes would force the wages up or lead to
Surname 3
employment of fewer workers. This is a way of justifying the poor conditions the workers
operate from that lacks fire exits, only has one bathroom and lacks clean drinking water. The
ventilation of the working environment is poor which explains why many workers faint while
still working.
Sweatshops have no respect for humanity at all. Their owners do not understand that
human beings have dignity unlike the machines and capital used in the process of production.
Denis G. Arnold and Norman E. Bowie apply the Kantian doctrine of respect for persons, which
states that human beings should always be treated as the end and not the means, to the problem
of sweatshops. Respect for people is what is required in morality, something that sweatshop
owners lack. The owners do not even respect the labor laws that are meant to protect the
employees while in the workplace.
According to Arnold and Bowie, sweatshop owners should make rational decisions that
show respect for human beings. They should provide an environment that ensures the well-being
of individuals. This should include the provision of clean water, good ventilation, fire exits and a
spacious working area to avoid overcrowding. Moreover, the employers should provide a living
wage to the employees that is enough to meet their basic needs. Overtime payments should be
included to avoid exploiting the workers. In addition, every employee deserves a day off after a
long week of work. Those workers spend a lot of their time working, especially the children who
are not even allowed to go home to their families. Living wages do not affect employment as per
Maitland but instead, ensures the well-being of the employees. The fact that the employees are
not coerced into providing their labor in the sweatshop does not guarantee the employers to take
advantage of their situation.
Surname 4
Works Cited
Arnold, Denis G., and Norman E. Bowie. "Sweatshops and respect for persons." Business Ethics
Quarterly 13.2 (2003): 221-242.
Maitland, Ian. "The great non-debate over international sweatshops." British Academy of
management annual conference proceedings. Vol. 1997. 1997.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.