Technophobia 3
cameras to “watch” those senior officials and administrators. Additionally, in most times,
“monitoring and tracking” especially “dataveillance” does not serve the particular purpose “but
an inadvertent consequence of some other goal for which a given system was originally
designed,” (Nissenbaum 2009, p. 24). This calls for more worries concerning modern
technologies and their contribution to individual security and privacy. Similarly, distribution of
information on global “social media” platforms like Facebook or Instagram is a threat to personal
privacy.
Facebook, as a social platform, has been perceived as a threat to privacy. According to
Goldie (2010), Facebook’s agenda to enhance “transparency” and efficient communication has
contributed to “self-surveillance” which leads to complete disclosure of individual’s personal
information to the public. Consequently, since information is stored in big databases,
manipulation is possible and this invades privacy (Goldie 2010). In some instances, the
information that one chooses to remain is exposed to the public. This means that Facebook is a
potentially significant threat to privacy. Additionally, concerns about privacy have been
facilitated by the current data collection, extensive data analysis, and collection technologies.
New technologies and innovations have been subject to criticism due to their invasion of
privacy. According to Regan (1995), modern technologies advance some policy issues
concerning privacy mainly at personal level. Such concerns are crucial and widely experienced
today. For example, recording of phone call conversations threats one’s freedom to privacy,
which results to fears against technology innovation. Similarly, such technologies give
organizations and the government more power over individuals (Regan 1995). This is why the
concern of technology is profound and highly justified.