The Dangerous Offender Designation

Running head: THE “DANGEROUS OFFENDER” DESIGNATION 1

The “Dangerous Offender” Designation

Students’ Name

University Affiliation

Date

THE “DANGEROUS OFFENDER” DESIGNATION 2

The “Dangerous Offender” Designation

Over the last decade, the Canadian community has received back an increase of

dangerous offenders and convicts that were sentenced to long-term supervision. According to the

Canadian law, "the dangerous offender" the courts have the moral duty to defend and protect the

public from such offender after they have deliberated and established a motive on the higher

probability of a criminal re-committing the crime (Easton & Piper, 2016). With the creation and

establishment of such defensive argument the criminal can be sentenced to determinate and

indeterminate periods. Moreover, there have been numerous arguments about the implementation

of the dangerous offender designation; thus, creating concern on its use in the Canadian judiciary

sector (Saleh, Grudzinskas, Bradford, & Brodsky, 2009). What comes to the mind of most

citizens is the fact that dangerous offender designation needs to be implemented more to help

restore balance within the boundary of the city. But there are different personalities and

professional whose ideology and philosophy does not concur with the fact that sentencing a

dangerous offender for a long duration is the key to behavior change and better adaptability

capabilities when released from prison (Grossman & Roberts, 2007). The essay focus on a

discussion about the motion on the use of the dangerous offender designation and its impact

towards creating a safer environment.

With the fact that most institutions have different levels of defining dangerous offender,

for example, the law enforcement urgency such as the police can identify sex offender and serial

killers as "dangerous offenders" the ideology of imposing the law to work against the criminal

effectively is the task of the courts and Crowns. Majorly, it is also identifiable that sentencing a

criminal to determined and undetermined time does not enhance the assurance of good behavior

when released but it deters the future criminal activity within a community (Shahidullah, 2012).

THE “DANGEROUS OFFENDER” DESIGNATION 3

With the fact that long-term sentencing of dangerous killer embraces punishment for the offender

against the community and victim, their sentence only but gives them the opportunity to deduce

better and skilful ways of committing a crime. With such implementation, the use of "dangerous

offenders" designation becomes useless because the criminal would have learned from other

inmates, better ways of committing the crime with reduced sentences. A good example is the

new trend of serial accidents caused by drunk drivers (Saleh, Grudzinskas, Bradford, & Brodsky,

2009). Also, most dangerous offenders are treated as unique cases, controlling their actions needs

supervision during incarceration and after release. It is through oversight via parole officers and

the police that enables the dangerous offenders to behave appropriately, but not the sentencing.

In other words, it is appropriate to reduce the use of the designation and implement supervised

rehabilitation.

Ever wondered the impacts of long-term punishment to the community. Does it reduce

the rates of homicides within a community? Also, does it minimize dangerous crimes within the

Canadian society? The answers to the question is a perfect no. First, to understand the theme of

the two issues it is better to analyze the discourse using the government policies and laws

implemented to reduce the crime rates in the nation (Milward, 2012). According to statistical

analysis, there has been an increase in the price of dangerous crimes and the more the severe the

sentencing such as life imprisonment and death penalties there is no guarantee that deters that the

crime rates will reduce. Moreover, increasing the severity of the punishment; thus, the use of

dangerous crimes designation may exacerbate recidivism. Also, it was stated that the length of a

prison sentence deters the behavior of a criminal; therefore, the hazardous offenders facing more

extended time in prison have a maximum prevent effect while those serving short time has a

shorter avert outcome (Grossman & Roberts, 2007). In other words, it is advisable to prefer

THE “DANGEROUS OFFENDER” DESIGNATION 4

deterrence to the severity because fear is not an element that reduces the crime rate in the

community, but deterrence enhances the use of active policies to prevent a criminal from

committing an offence.

Research also emphasizes the role of the police and other law enforcement agencies as

deters of crime. It is so because the cops prevent crime by perceiving that the all sins must be

answerable by the criminals and no offence shall go unpunished. With the fact that all law

enforcement agencies were designed and established to fight crime, their deeds such as assuring

the nation that about their protection (Easton & Piper, 2016). It was evident that actions are more

aggressive than the policies and laws that govern a country. First, for a nation to be productive

there needs to be routine patrols from the sentinels; therefore, creating caution on their action to

respond to any attack within all the neighbourhoods (Shahidullah, 2012). It is a deter because

criminal activities are demotivated when the police are on watch. On the other hand, policies are

created to guide the righteous because if someone is not a criminal, he or she will not want to

face the law and would rather be safe by ensuring they abide by these policies (Grossman &

Roberts, 2007). Criminal behavior is one the detests the law, it repels what it stands for, and it is

likely to change if forces are implementing the policies. Lastly, most criminal activities occur in

places with minimal police and security, and the dangerous crime designation can only apply in

case they are apprehended.

Majorly, policies require enforcers who have the legal rights to work under the rules and

regulations of the law to help reduce dangerous crimes. First, "dangerous offender" designation

is an essential law in the Canadian community because it assists in sentencing vital criminals

longer. Also, to some extent, the code is not necessary because it deters the behavior of the

offender towards a better life the is responsive and accommodating. It is ideal to understand that

THE “DANGEROUS OFFENDER” DESIGNATION 5

crime rates will drop when the right approach is taken and to do that the first step is to ensure

that the rather than use prison as a punishment facility it needs to be replaced with supervised

rehabilitation. Rehabilitating dangerous offenders is not easy, but with the care and responsibility

of the parole and police officers, offenders have the opportunity to be readmitted to the

community and their behavior adjusted in a manner that embraces safety. Secondly, the

dangerous offenders' sentences need to be reduced because those serving a shorter jail sentence

have the opportunity to change their criminal behavior, while those serving longer sentences

have a small opportunity to change their criminal behavior. Besides, the severity of the

punishment does not deter criminal behavior. In other words, no matter the severity of the

punishment a criminal's behavior will not change because on a daily basis there are crimes

reported and to some extent, they are severe even though there are case said about the penalties.

Lastly, the use of police action deters criminal behavior.

THE “DANGEROUS OFFENDER” DESIGNATION 6

References

Easton, S., & Piper, C. (2016). Sentencing and Punishment: The Quest for Justice. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Grossman, M., & Roberts, J. (2007). Criminal Justice in Canada: A Reader. Nelson Education

Limited.

Milward, D. (2012). Aboriginal Justice and the Charter: Realizing a Culturally Sensitive

Interpretation of Legal Rights. UBC Press.

Saleh, F., Grudzinskas, A., Bradford, J., & Brodsky, D. (2009). Sex Offenders: Identification,

Risk Assessment, Treatment, and Legal Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shahidullah. (2012). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Paper type

Deadline

Page count

550 words

Total price: $ 15.00

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Ian McGregor

UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Shannon Williams

Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."