In  his  analysis,  Kemal  (2011,  p.157)  used  accounting  ratio  to  analyze  the 
financial  performance  of  RBS  in  Pakistan  after  mergers,  Kemal  drew  the 
conclusion that the merger of RBS failed to pull up its profitability (Kemal, 2011, 
p.162).  
Besides the potential of not increasing profitability, the aggressive growth 
model of merge and acquisition creates asset concerns and uncertainties. 
Through the merge and acquisition, RBS did expand its scale; however, it 
also caused the public’s concerns because the public had no idea of the scale 
of future loan losses. And this uncertainty contributes to the loss of confidence 
in RBS (FSA, 2011, p.39). 
  
2.2.2 The decline of Confidence in Banking System 
In  2008,  the  market  came  to  realized  the  risks  coming  with  the  complex 
interconnectedness  of  the  banking  and  shadow banking  systems.  Thus,  all 
banks became difficult to liquid its capital. The difficulty was extreme huge for 
RBS because it was in poor condition of asset quality, capital adequacy and 
liquidity (FSA, 2011, p.39).  
  
  
3.4 The result of crisis 
The “merge and acquisition” development model made RBS one of the largest 
banks around the world. However, it also led to the biggest crisis it faced in 
history. In 2007, it made up its decision to buy ABM Amro in a €72 billion deal. 
The acquisition was not healthy (Telegraph, 2010). In December 2007, RBS 
had to reveal its write-down of 1.5 billion Euros and in April, 2008, it 
announced another write-down of around 6 billion Euros (The Guardian, 
2011). In October 2008, the price of RBS fell from 195p per share to around 
85p, which led to the bailout of the British government by takes a 58pc in RBS 
for 15 billion Euros (Telegraph, 2010). In addition, more than £45bn of 
taxpayer funds have been injected into the Royal Bank of Scotland.