In his analysis, Kemal (2011, p.157) used accounting ratio to analyze the
financial performance of RBS in Pakistan after mergers, Kemal drew the
conclusion that the merger of RBS failed to pull up its profitability (Kemal, 2011,
p.162).
Besides the potential of not increasing profitability, the aggressive growth
model of merge and acquisition creates asset concerns and uncertainties.
Through the merge and acquisition, RBS did expand its scale; however, it
also caused the public’s concerns because the public had no idea of the scale
of future loan losses. And this uncertainty contributes to the loss of confidence
in RBS (FSA, 2011, p.39).
2.2.2 The decline of Confidence in Banking System
In 2008, the market came to realized the risks coming with the complex
interconnectedness of the banking and shadow banking systems. Thus, all
banks became difficult to liquid its capital. The difficulty was extreme huge for
RBS because it was in poor condition of asset quality, capital adequacy and
liquidity (FSA, 2011, p.39).
3.4 The result of crisis
The “merge and acquisition” development model made RBS one of the largest
banks around the world. However, it also led to the biggest crisis it faced in
history. In 2007, it made up its decision to buy ABM Amro in a €72 billion deal.
The acquisition was not healthy (Telegraph, 2010). In December 2007, RBS
had to reveal its write-down of 1.5 billion Euros and in April, 2008, it
announced another write-down of around 6 billion Euros (The Guardian,
2011). In October 2008, the price of RBS fell from 195p per share to around
85p, which led to the bailout of the British government by takes a 58pc in RBS
for 15 billion Euros (Telegraph, 2010). In addition, more than £45bn of
taxpayer funds have been injected into the Royal Bank of Scotland.